The Theory and Practice of the Scriptural Exegesis in Augustine (original) (raw)
2014, Kamimura, N. (ed.), Research Report Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 23520098
- Acknowledgements vii - Abbreviations ix - N. Kamimura, ‘Introduction’, 1-11 - N. Kamimura, ‘The Exegesis of Genesis in the Early Works of Augustine’, 13-24 - M. Sato, ‘The Role of Eve in Salvation in Augustine’s Interpretation of Genesis’, 25-32 - M. Sato, ‘The Word and Our Words: Augustine’s View of Words Based on John 1:3’, 33-39 - N. Kamimura, ‘Augustine’s Quest for Perfection and the Encounter with the Vita Antonii’, 41-52 - N. Kamimura, ‘The Interpretation of a Passage from Romans in the Early Works of Augustine’, 53-62 - N. Kamimura, ‘Augustine’s Evolving Commentaries on the Pauline Epistles’, 63-72 - Bibliography 75 - Index locorum 85
Related papers
Take Up and Read”: Basics of Augustine's Biblical Interpretation
Interpretation-a Journal of Bible and Theology, 2004
Augustine was convinced that the Bible is meant to promote one thing: the love of God and neighbor. Although the human language of the inspired scriptures constitutes a formidable challenge, studying the Bible may be the best use of our limited life span. God the master rhetorician will teach, delight, and move anyone who takes it up and reads.
Augustine’s ecclesiology and its development between 354 and 387 AD
Hts Teologiese Studies Theological Studies, 2013
The aim of this article is twofold. The first is to describe Augustine's ecclesiology and its development between his birth (354) and baptism (387). Secondly, it will show that the defining features of Augustine's later ecclesiology were in place by the year 387 AD. Augustine's ecclesiology between his birth and 19th year (354-373) Some scholars like Clark believe that Augustine's ecclesiology was influenced by the preceding African theologians Cyprian, Optatus and his own reading of scripture (1994:73). This seems to be true, but is not the full truth. O'Meara rightly argues that 'men have often forgotten the[se] first years of Christian belief and piety when Augustine was a willing pupil at his mother's knee' (1954:38). Van Oort goes further by saying, that from his early youth, Augustine grew up in the tradition of the Catholic Church and received a Christian education ([1991] 2013:26). It is clear that Augustine did have some form of ecclesiology during this early period of his life yet this is admittedly difficult to fully determine. Nonetheless, there is evidence to show its existence and that Augustine remembered what it was when he penned the Confessions.
This essay attempts to analyze Augustine’s hermeneutics and homiletics in his De doctrina christiana. I will offer a succinct synopsis of the work and highlight various points showing Augustine’s hermeneutical and homiletical characteristics. Augustine stresses the importance of humiliation in the study of Scripture. He also regards the duplex commandment of love in Matthew 22 as the heart of Christian faith. In Augustine’s hermeneutics, sign has an important role. God can communicate with the believer through the signs of the Scriptures. Thus, humiliation, love, and the knowledge of signs are an essential hermeneutical presupposition for a sound interpretation of the Scriptures. Although Augustine endorses some teaching of the Platonism of his time, he corrects and recasts it according to a theocentric doctrine of the Bible. Similarly, in a practical discipline, he modifies the classical theory of oratory in a Christian way. He underscores the meaning of diligent study of the Bible and prayer as more than mere human knowledge and oratory skills. As a concluding remark, Augustine encourages the interpreter and preacher of the Bible to seek a good manner of life and, most of all, to love God and neighbor. * Key words: Augustine, hermeneutics, humiliation, love, prayer
Sero te amaui: A Reading of Augustine’s Confessiones X.27.38 in the Context of the His Early Texts
Saint Augustine of Hippo influenced Western Christianity as a theologian and bishop throughout his long literary career. Central to the Christianization of his intellectual development was reading “quosdam Platonicorum libros”–“certain Platonic books.” This paper contributes to the discussion of Augustine’s Platonism by providing an analysis of Confessiones X.27.38 in light of the Enneads of Plotinus and Augustine’s De Ordine libri duo and Contra Academicos libri tres–both early Cassiciacum texts. We find such a methodology important on account of the warning of J. J. O’Donnell: the later reflections of Augustine on his conversion experience may create “a structure for the past that is not irrefutable.” Consequently, we will bracket Augustine’s works written after the Confessiones. Within this epoché, the analysis of Confessiones X.27.38 will follow an iterative approach. After delineating certain salient features, we will examine the Enneads and Augustine’s early Cassiciacum texts with these very features in mind. The fruit of this investigation will serve as the backdrop for a final reading of Confessiones X.27.38. We will show that Augustine in Confessiones X.27.38 adheres to a Neo-Platonic structure and that it has clear antecedents in Augustine’s early writings. The Neo-Platonic doctrines involved in the structure of Confessiones X.27.38 will have significance for questions regarding the Platonicorum libros by uncovering the doctrinal contents of these books. Our investigation will set the stage for further in depth analyses of Augustine’s Confessiones.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.