The Power of Relationships: A Qualitative Study of a University-Community Partnership Model in Higher Education (original) (raw)
Related papers
Community-University Partnerships: Community Engagement for Transformative Learning
2008
Recently, various scholars have remarked that university continuing education (UCE) is moving away from one of its original core foci, that of social justice. In this article, the possible causes of this are discussed, including current political environments, the role of universities and academics in perpetuating or disrupting the status quo, and increased reliance on cost recovery and for-profit programming. Community-based participatory research as a feasible strategy for promoting UCE’s role in social justice is also presented. An example of UCE that was developed in response to existing social inequities and driven by discussions with the community is offered to demonstrate that critical voices can have an impact and that institutions of higher education can be collaborative and foster networks of relationships for learning. Finally, key points for the successful development of a UCE program that responds to critical voices and returns to social justice are shared.
A Critical Approach to University-Community Partnerships: Reflecting on the Diverse Realities
Educational Research for Social Change, 2021
Postapartheid South Africa has seen a greater focus on community engagement by universities, and its inclusion as one of the core focus areas of higher education in addition to teaching and research. This focus on engagement with the community was ignited by a requirement to enhance the university's social responsibility through establishing partnerships with the communities it serves. Higher education institutions have traditionally positioned themselves in engagement projects as the singular organisation that has knowledge to offer when compared to what the community can offer. In this paper, we propose a critical engagement process to enhance collaboration in engagement projects. Our qualitative study resides in a critical theory paradigm, and we used drawings as well as narrative free writing to reflect and explore our perceptions regarding community engagement. We used the collaborative self-study methodology because it provides opportunities for critical and self-critical ...
Implementing a university paradigm for effective community engagement
Australian Association for …, 2010
Community engagement is emerging as a core function of Australian universities and their faculties. The collaboration and development of effective and sustainable partnerships can strengthen the role of the university within the community and influence those who formulate policy. This paper reports on the development and implementation of key principles and processes that are foundational to community engagement: relationship formation; sustainability; forming mutually beneficial goals; mentoring; social justice frameworks; communication; awareness-raising; identifying social injustice issues and inequalities that need to be investigated and addressed; and supportive university structures. These principles and processes are illuminated through two key community engagement projects involving the Faculty of Education. The first is the development of a teacher education program in Bachau, East Timor, and the second is a community based tertiary education program, Clemente, for the poor and marginalised within Australia's society. Through these programs, Australian Catholic University has evolved an understanding of the critical relevance of community engagement in making a difference in peoples' lives. Further, the programs have provided additional insights into the organisational structures required for effective community engagement. These include recognition of the time involved in forming, developing and maintaining relationships, and negotiating and implementing community engagement activities.
Strengthening university and community capacities: models for engagement and education
2014
This thesis examines ways in which low literacy and essential skill levels, and access to education, have profound implications for community health and are inextricably linked to other social determinants of health. It explores possibilities for forging new and innovative ways for excluded individuals and communities to participate meaningfully in university-based education, specifically with respect to Simon Fraser University and Vancouver's Downtown Eastside neighbourhood. The thesis examines a number of theoretical and methodological approaches from various disciplines, including public health, public policy, adult education, critical and indigenous pedagogies, and communication for social change; gives an overview of relevant examples of universitycommunity engagement activities; extracts key lessons learned from a case study of community engaged programming that occurred at Simon Fraser University in 2011/2012; and concludes by making recommendations for strengthened efforts on the part of the university to sustain collaboratively developed community-engaged programming.
The construction of university-community partnerships: entangled perspectives
Higher Education, 2011
The development of meaningful partnerships with communities is a shared concern of many higher education institutions. However, the building of significant partnerships between universities and communities is still a complex task, which generates multiple tensions. Based on a qualitative study that examined the lived experiences of participants in an innovative university-community partnership in Israel, the article analyzes the concept of partnership from a social constructivist theoretical perspective. The study focused on four research areas: the experience of partnership; the perception of partnership; the barriers to partnership-building, and the impact of participation on participants. Findings challenge essentialist views of partnership and highlight the constructed and discursive nature of the concept. The article found several crucial factors to be acknowledged in the process of partnership management: role perspectives, group affiliation, institutional context, power relations, the organizational culture of the partnership, and the societal perceptions of social problems addressed by the partnership. It concludes with some recommendations for the management of more meaningful university-community partnerships. Keywords University-community partnership Á Poverty Á Constructivism The development of meaningful partnerships has become a common interest of many higher education institutions and communities. However, the building of significant partnerships between universities and communities is still a complex task, which generates multiple tensions. This article is based on a qualitative study that examined the participants' experiences of an innovative partnership aimed at combating poverty and social exclusion in Israel. As many other Academy-Community partnership programs, this shared venture seeks to tackle shared common goals and to serve joint interests. However, the uniqueness of this project is twofold. First, this partnership acknowledged from its inception the existence of huge unequal power relations between the partners, especially
Community University Partnerships Through Communities of Practice
2011
This study explores the application of the communities of practice approach (CoP) tocommunity-university partnerships (CUPs). A specific focus is whether forming CoPs might help struggling communities cope within an increasingly resource-stretched environment. Might they bring people together to solve common problems, overcoming differences inperspective brought about by specific organisational affiliations and personal backgrounds? Data includes: a literature review, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with CUP members, and Chicago fieldwork. Our study developed the research capacity of a local practitioner who shared the project's learning within his ethnic minority community and beyond. Data analysis indicated the versatility of the CoP approach for individuals working inpartnership across boundaries (for example voluntary, statutory and university sectors). Strikingly, our literature review shows little application of the CoP approach to CUPs,beyond our own limited w...
University-community partnerships: A framework and an exemplar
Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action., 2004
University-community partnerships are at the heart of community research and action. In these partnerships, university researchers work in collaboration with a variety of settings and programs, involving community leaders, agency staff, or members of grassroots and self-help groups. This chapter reviews the literature on university-community partnerships and provides a framework of 10 characteristics that are typical of successful partnership endeavors. We illustrate these principles with an example of a collaborative research project undertaken by a DePaul University research team that has engaged in a 10-year partnership with a community-based, self-run, residential substance abuse recovery program called Oxford House. Through a review of this collaborative effort, the authors examine the distinct opportunities and constraints in adopting unconventional methods of inquiry and action, highlighting a number of practical and theoretical issues that have been raised as the research team has striven to maintain a mutually beneficial alliance throughout the endeavor. The experience of the research team demonstrates the benefits to be gained from cultivating and maintaining collaborative university-community partnerships.
Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning
The research investigates the processes and characteristics of community-valued undergraduate community service-learning (CSL) initiatives that are housed within long-term community-university partnerships (CUPs). Using a case study design, the study used in-depth, semi-structured interviews, document review, and observation to understand three CSL/CUPs within a small, liberal arts university in Atlantic Canada. In total, 54 interviews were conducted with individuals involved with the partnerships, including the community organization partners, staff/volunteers of the community organizations, community residents, students, faculty, and university administrators. Part of the analysis process involved co-writing the stories of each of the CSL/CUPs with the community organization partner and the faculty member partner from each CSL/CUP. From the three CSL/CUP stories and current literature, a conceptual model was developed. This model depicts the processes (development, co-creation, implementation, and care) and key characteristics (reciprocity, dialogue, and praxis) of long-term CUPs that are committed to a shared domain and community-valued development outcomes.