Workers' Rights: Rethinking Protective Labor Legislation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Labor Law Reform in a World of Competitive Product Markets - The Kenneth M. Piper Lectureship Series
Chicago Kent Law Review, 1993
U.S. private sector unionism is in decline. From a high watermark in 1953 of around 35.7% of the private nonagricultural workforce, union membership has fallen to 11.5% and unions represent under 13% of private sector workers.' Absent reform of the labor relations system, 2 the trend is clear. Unions will remain a significant force in government employment, big-city commercial construction, rail and air transportation, and certain shrinking mining and manufacturing industries. Aside from these pockets of unionism,
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2007
and the team of the WDR-2005 for many useful insights. Amy Luinstra provided important material for our analysis of core labor standards, Jan Rutkowski helped with the assessment of labor market flexibility, Milan Vodopivec provided an essential contribution to our analysis of income support schemes and Victor Sulla contributed to the analysis of micro data. This paper has not undergone the review accorded to official World Bank publications. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. TABLE OF BOXES Box 1: The economic effects of core labor standards…………………………………………..….26 Box 2: The characteristics of the informal sector…………………………………………………..28 Box 3: Unions have taken on new roles………………………………………………………….…34 Box 4: Labor regulation and global integration …………………………………………………….44 Box 5: Do employers' perceptions square with actual labor regulations?…………………………..46 Box 6: Reforms of the severance pay: reducing labor market distortions and enhancing insurance 62 0 How Labor Market Policies can Combine Workers' Protection with Job Creation A partial review of some key issues and policy options Background paper for WDR 2005 "A Better Investment Climate-for Everyone"
Labor Law: Cases, Materials, and Problems
2003
No startling innovations. No radical changes in philosophy, coverage, or organization. Just thorough updating, judicious pruning, and scholarly refinement here and there. That fairly well sums up my appraisal of the second edition of Professor Meltzer's labor law casebook. It undoubtedly will continue to hold a prominent position among the established casebooks in the field'-whose number just happens to match the number of major law text publishers. When the first edition was published in 1970, it received extensive reviewer comparison with the other three leading casebooks then available. 2 Since most of the similarities and differences noted then are still present in the second edition, further detailed analysis along those lines would be supererogatory. It suffices to say that the primary distinguishing feature of Meltzer's book-in keeping with "the Chicago approach"-continues to be his effort to integrate the practical and policy problems of labor law with the social sciences, particularly economics and psychology. This tone is set in the introductory chapters, which first review the historical and institutional framework of the labor movement and then describe the factual and economic contexts of contemporary regulation. Of necessity, the text and data on the factual background have been extensively revised to reflect recent trends in the composition of the labor force, unemployment, earnings, union membership, and work stoppages. The section on workers, unions, and the economy poses fundamental economic and social questions; it retains the classic but still controversial essay by Simons, "Some Reflections on Syndicalism," paired with the more balanced view t Professor of Law, University of Kansas.
A Call out of Seir: The Meaning and Future of US Labor Law
Law & Social Inquiry
The Cambridge Handbook of US Labor Law for the Twenty-First Century decries federal labor law for forsaking American workers and undermining American unions. Its contributors seek a reformed labor law for the current century. In this review essay, I examine the handbook’s contention that federal labor law has failed. To assess the merits of the claim, we must test the foundations of its contributors’ assumptions—about the labor movement, about the place of the labor movement in the political economy of American capitalism envisaged by labor law, and, indeed, about law itself. To do so, I turn to earlier, critical research on the character of American labor laws, notably Joel Rogers’s seminal 1990 essay “Divide and Conquer,” and also to work of my own. To put it crudely, I ask how much labor law reform actually matters.
Building an adequate U.S. labor and social protection system for the 21st century
ILO EXTENSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY WORKING PAPAR , 2018
This paper reviews the erosion of labor and social protections for U.S. workers and households over recent decades. It discusses the causes and the relative weight of different elements of the erosion in order to bring clarity to the discussion of needed reforms. It proposes a framework of policy objectives and principles to guide choices for reform among policy alternatives in the specific U.S. context. The paper also explores the relative merits of some alternative proposals to address these challenges. The prospects for political and legislative action to create a viable modern social and labor protection system are discussed. The paper concludes that updating and strengthening existing elements of the U.S. system provides a firm foundation for creating an adequate U.S. labor and social protection floor for the 21st century, if critical additional rights and programs are built on and integrated into this foundation.
The Powerful Role of Unproven Economic Assumptions in Work Law
Journal of Law and Political Economy
Many rules and statutory interpretations in US work law that entrench employers' power over workers rely on unproven economic assumptions. This article explores three. First, courts assume that the individual employee and employer have relatively equal bargaining power, an assumption often framed and defended within the circular logic of "freedom of contract." Second, courts assume that the employer's authority over the enterprise-its managerial prerogative-must be near absolute to promote efficiency in the enterprise and economy. Third, courts assume that the costs of maintaining the status quo of managerial prerogative and an employer's at-will authority are less than the costs of altering it. Courts use these assumptions to give employers broad rights to terminate employees, to impose arbitration agreements, and to limit worker collective rights.
2004
Implementation of workplace policies--whether through enforcement of laws or administration of programs--raises the question of the interaction between institutions created to carry out laws and the activities of workplace based agents that directly (e.g. unions) or indirectly (e.g. insurance companies) represent the interests of workers. This paper argues that there are two distinctive roles required for agents in the implementation of workplace policies. First, the agent must somehow help solve the public goods problem inherent in workplace regulation. Second, the agent must be able to reduce the marginal cost of exercising rights conferred to workers that are an important feature of most regulatory programs. This article examines these issues in regard to implementing workplace policies in the U.S. and analyzes the comparative effectiveness of different workplace agents-from labor unions to alternative dispute resolution systems-in fulfilling these roles.