Endocrine Therapy, New Biologicals, and New Study Designs for Presurgical Studies in Breast Cancer (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2001
The agents used for endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer have changed markedly over the past decade. Tamoxifen remains the anti-oestrogen of choice, but could be replaced by the oestrogen receptor down-regulator ICI 182780 or by the fixed ring triphenylethylene arzoxifene (previously SERM III) soon. Whilst aminoglutethimide and 4-OH androstenedione were the aromatase inhibitors of choice, they have been replaced by non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) inhibitors of high potency and low side effect profile. Previously, often used treatments such as progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) and androgens are now rarely used or confined to fourth or fifth line treatments. The LHRH agonist, goserelin, remains the treatment of choice for pre-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer although recent randomised trials indicate a response, time to progression and survival advantage for the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen compared with goserelin alone.
BMC Cancer, 2013
Background: The role of estrogen receptor beta (ER-β) in breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Some studies have suggested that ER-β may oppose the actions of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α), and clinical evidence has indicated that the loss of ER-β expression is associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to endocrine therapy. The objective of the present study was to determine the role of ER-β and the ER-α/ER-β ratio in predicting the response to endocrine therapy and whether different regimens have any effect on ER-β expression levels. Methods: Ninety postmenopausal patients with primary BC were recruited for a short-term double-blinded randomized prospective controlled study. To determine tumor cell proliferation, we measured the expression of Ki67 in tumor biopsy samples taken before and after 26 days of treatment with anastrozole 1 mg/day (N = 25), tamoxifen 20 mg/day (N = 24) or placebo (N = 29) of 78 participants. The pre-and post-samples were placed in tissue microarray blocks and submitted for immunohistochemical assay. Biomarker statuses (ER-β, ER-α and Ki67) were obtained by comparing each immunohistochemical evaluation of the pre-and post-surgery samples using the semi-quantitative Allred's method. Statistical analyses were performed using an ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient tests, with significance at p ≤ 0.05. Results: The frequency of ER-β expression did not change after treatment (p = 0.33). There were no significant changes in Ki67 levels in ER-β-negative cases (p = 0.45), but in the ER-β-positive cases, the anastrozole (p = 0.01) and tamoxifen groups (p = 0.04) presented a significant reduction in post-treatment Ki67 scores. There was a weak but positive correlation between the ER-α and ER-β expression levels. Only patients with an ER-α/ER-β expression ratio between 1 and 1.5 demonstrated significant differences in Ki67 levels after treatment with anastrozole (p = 0.005) and tamoxifen (p = 0.026).
The endocrine prevention of breast cancer
Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2008
Breast cancer incidence is increasing in all parts of the world. Although in Western countries death rates are declining, there is a need to make attempts to prevent the disease in order to reduce the trauma of diagnosis and treatment. Endocrine approaches to breast cancer prevention have been the most successful approach to cancer prevention to date. Studies with tamoxifen were initiated when it was noted that, during adjuvant treatment after surgery to prevent relapse, the incidence of new contralateral cancers was reduced by half. Four trials of !5 years of tamoxifen compared with placebo in women at increased risk of breast cancer were initiated in the 1980s and showed a similar reduction in breast cancer, but only in oestrogen-receptor-positive disease. Recent follow-up indicated that there is a carry-over effect of tamoxifen after the completion of treatment at 5 years so that the preventive effect at 10 years is significantly great than at 5. The selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene has also been assessed as a preventive agent in two major international randomized trials compared with placebo and shows a protective effect similar to that of tamoxifen. An American study subsequently compared tamoxifen and raloxifene in a trial of nearly 20,000 women at increased risk (the STAR trial) and demonstrated that the two agents were equally effective but that the toxicity of raloxifene was less. Adjuvant trials comparing tamoxifen and the modern potent aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) indicate that they are superior to tamoxifen and reduce contralateral breast cancer by approximately 70%. This observation has led to the initiation of two trials in postmenopausal women comparing anastrozole (the IBISII trial) or exemestane (the MAP-3 trial) with placebo. Currently it is recommended that tamoxifen is used to prevent breast cancer in premenopausal women and raloxifene for postmenopausal women (it is not effective in the premenopausal group),and we await the results of the aromatase inhibitor trials.
A B S T R A C T Purpose To determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in estrogen receptor (ER) –positive primary breast cancer triaged to chemotherapy when the protein encoded by the MKI67 gene (Ki67) level was. 10% after 2 to 4 weeks of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. A second objective was to examine risk of relapse using the Ki67-based Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI). Methods The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1031A trial enrolled post-menopausal women with stage II or III ER-positive (Allred score, 6 to 8) breast cancer whose treatment was randomly assigned to neoadjuvant AI therapy with anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole. For the trial ACOSOG Z1031B, the protocol was amended to include a tumor Ki67 determination after 2 to 4 weeks of AI. If the Ki67 was. 10%, patients were switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A pCR rate of. 20% was the predefined efficacy threshold. In patients who completed neoadjuvant AI, stratified Cox modeling was used to assess whether time to recurrence differed by PEPI = 0 score (T1 or T2, N0, Ki67 , 2.7%, ER Allred. 2) versus PEPI. 0 disease. Results Only two of the 35 patients in ACOSOG Z1031B who were switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced a pCR (5.7%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 19.1%). After 5.5 years of median follow-up, four (3.7%) of the 109 patients with a PEPI = 0 score relapsed versus 49 (14.4%) of 341 of patients with PEPI. 0 (recurrence hazard ratio [PEPI = 0 v PEPI. 0], 0.27; P = .014; 95% CI, 0.092 to 0.764). Conclusion Chemotherapy efficacy was lower than expected in ER-positive tumors exhibiting AI-resistant proliferation. The optimal therapy for these patients should be further investigated. For patients with PEPI = 0 disease, the relapse risk over 5 years was only 3.6% without chemotherapy, supporting the study of adjuvant endocrine monotherapy in this group. These Ki67 and PEPI triage approaches are being definitively studied in the ALTERNATE trial (Alternate Approaches for Clinical Stage II or III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatment in Postmenopausal Women: A Phase III Study; clinical trial information: NCT01953588).
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: past, present and future
Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2008
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy studies for breast cancer are a great opportunity to develop insights into the biologic basis for the efficacy of estrogen receptor-targeting agents. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment is also appealing from the drug development perspective. Theoretically, a promising new adjuvant endocrine strategy could be first tested as a short-term neoadjuvant treatment against a standard medication. Improvements in tumor response rate, surgical outcomes, and evidence for enhanced efficacy at the cellular level, for example in terms of the effect on proliferation, would provide a sound basis for taking the new approach forward into the resource-demanding setting of a phase III adjuvant trial. The potential of randomized phase III neoadjuvant endocrine treatment trials was first emphasized by the results of a double-blind study by Eiermann et al (Letrozole P024) 2 that compared 4 months of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole with tamoxifen as neoadjuvant treatment for women with hormone-receptor-positive tumors who were ineligible for breast-conserving surgery. Letrozole outperformed tamoxifen in terms of clinical and radiologic response rates as well as in the incidence of subsequent breast-conserving surgery. Interestingly, the advantage of letrozole appeared to be particularly evident in a subpopulation of tumors with estrogen-receptor-positive (ERϩ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1 and/or HER2-positive tumors, indicating that the comparison of endocrine agents in the neoadjuvant setting could provide insights into the molecular basis for differences in efficacy between endocrine agents. 3 The enhanced efficacy of letrozole was also apparent at the level of the cell cycle, since letrozole suppressed tumor Ki67 immunohistochemical staining to a greater extent than tamoxifen. 4 These results were consistent with the advantages of third generation aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in other disease settings. 5
Aromatase inhibitors: Cellular and molecular effects
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2005
Marked cellular and molecular changes may occur in breast cancers following treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitors. Neoadjuvant protocols, in which treatment is given with the primary tumour still within the breast, are particularly illuminating. In Edinburgh, we have shown that 3 months treatment with either anastrozole, exemestane or letrozole produces pathological responses in the majority of oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich tumours (39/59) as manifested by reduced cellularity/increased fibrosis. Changes in histological grading may also take place, most notably a reduction in mitotic figures. This probably reflects an influence on proliferation as most tumours (82%) show a marked decrease in the proliferation marker, Ki67. These effects are generally more dramatic than seen with tamoxifen given in the same setting. Differences between aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen are also apparent in changes in steroid hormone expression. Thus, immuno-staining for progesterone receptor (PgR) is reduced in almost all cases by aromatase inhibitors, becoming undetectable in many. This contrasts with effects of tamoxifen in which the most common change on PgR is to increase expression. Changes in proliferation occur rapidly following the onset of exposure to aromatase inhibitors. Thus, neoadjuvant studies with letrozole in which tumour was sampled before and after 14 days and 3 months treatment show that decreased expression of Ki67 occur at 14 days and, in many cases, the effect is greater at 14 days than 3 months. These early changes precede evidence of clinical response but do not predict for it. However, this study design has allowed RNA analysis of sequential biopsies taken during the neoadjuvant therapy. Based on clustering techniques, it has been possible to subdivide tumours into groups showing distinct patterns of molecular changes. These changes in tumour gene expression may allow definition of tumour cohorts with differing sensitivity to aromatase inhibitors and permit early recognition of response and resistance.
Current concepts in the endocrine therapy of breast cancer: tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 2005
Recent results from randomized controlled trials have indicated that aromatase inhibitors have superior anticancer efficacy and toxicity profiles compared with tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer. This has led clinicians to question whether adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is still justified. This article discusses the evidence for the superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen. There are limitations to the use of these drugs, and they have side effects, which require further clarification. In addition, there are certain niche advantages to the use of tamoxifen, and this drug has undergone rigorous appraisal over the last 20 years.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1996
The aromatase inhibitor vorozole dose-dependently inhibited the growth of dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinoma in the rat. An oral dose of 5 mg/kg per day brought about growth inhibition and reduction of tumor multiplicity similar to that produced by ovariectomy. Tamoxifen (8 mg/kg per day) also reduced tumor growth, albeit to a lesser extent than did ovariectomy. Concomitant administration of varying doses of tamoxifen with the fully effective dose of vorozole (5 mg/kg per day) tended to be less effective than ovariectomy or vorozole alone. This is likely to be due to the estrogen-agonistic effects of tamoxifen. Combination of tamoxifen with the partially effective dose of vorozole (1 mg/kg per day) gave results comparable with those obtained for either of these compounds used in monotherapy. Combining tamoxifen with a marginally active low dose of vorozole (0.2 mg/kg per day) resulted in a minor additional growth inhibition as compared with that obtained with this dose of vorozole alone. Sequential treatment with tamoxifen (8 mg/kg per day) for 42 days and vorozole (5 mg/kg per day) for 42 days, and vice-versa, was performed with a drug-free interval of 14 days between treatments. Tumors regressing under vorozole therapy relapsed when subsequently treated with tamoxifen. In contrast, vorozole further reduced tumor volumes in rats previously treated with tamoxifen. Furthermore, monotherapy with tamoxifen as well as the two sequential tamoxifen-vorozole treatment schedules were in most cases less effective than vorozole monotherapy in inhibiting both tumor growth and tumor multiplicity. Although extrapolation of these findings in cycling animals to the clinical situation, involving postmenopausal women, is not straightforward, these results warrant further studies in preclinical models. Moreover, clinical trials comparing the most effective aromatase inhibitors with tamoxifen in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with breast cancer may also be warranted.