Modern Diasporas from a Political Science Perspective: the Case of Armenian Diaspora (original) (raw)
Related papers
A narrow, state-centric, and ahistorical approach to the definition and study of Diaspora cannot be justified by the dangers of promiscuous categorization, a desire for simplicity or practicality, or even lacunae in theories of migration. In addition to reconstructing a definition and typology of Diaspora that is applicable to a post-positivist view of the social sciences, and in particular international political economy, this article is an attempt to ‘rescue' Diaspora from its own entrenched victimhood, as well as from the elements of an overarching discourse that conspire to hide its applicability to the wider global political economy.
Diaspora Policies in Theory and Practice
The main aim of this paper is to give a general overview of diaspora policies with an emphasis on kin-state activism in Central and Eastern Europe. The first section of the paper will summarize the main theoretical approaches to diaspora studies, which are marked by the emerging tendency toward typology construction. In this part I will explore the most relevant typologies within this field of study from a critical perspective. The second section of the paper will turn to existing diaspora policies, offering a structural collection of the most commonly adopted diaspora engagement practices in Central and Eastern Europe. I will examine why and under what conditions kin-states in this part of Europe seek to engage co-national communities living beyond their borders, with special regard to the similarities.
Diaspora Politics At Home Abroad
This book is intended to fill a gap in the study of modern ethnonational diasporas. Against the background of current trendsglobalization, regionalization, democratization, the weakening of the nation-state, and massive trans-state migration -it examines the politics of historical, modern, and incipient ethno-national diasporas. It argues that in contrast to the widely accepted view, ethno-national diasporism and diasporas do not constitute a recent phenomenon. Rather, this is a long-standing phenomenon whose roots are in antiquity. Some of the existing diasporas were created in antiquity, some during the Middle Ages, and some in modern times. Essential aspects of this phenomenon are the unending cultural-social-economic struggles and especially the political struggles of these dispersed ethnic groups, permanently residing in host countries away from their homelands, to maintain their distinctive identities and connections with their homelands and other dispersed groups from the same nations. While describing and analyzing the diaspora phenomenon, the book sheds light on theoretical questions pertaining to current ethnic politics in general.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2019
Origin-state institutions dedicated to emigrants and their descendants have been largely unnoticed by mainstream political studies even though diaspora institutions are now found in over half the countries of the world. In response, we first develop alternative theories explaining diaspora institution emergence. They emerge to: 'tap' diasporas for resources vital to origin-state development and security; 'embrace' diasporas to help define origin-state political identity and achieve domestic political goals; or 'govern' diasporas in ways that demonstrate origin-state adherence to global norms. Second, we investigate empirical support for these tapping, embracing and governing explanations in regression and related analyses of diaspora institution emergence in 113 origin states observed from 1992 to 2012. Findings suggest support for all three perspectives with more robust evidentiary support for governing. Our analyses suggest several directions for future research on how and why diaspora institutions emerge for different origin-state purposes.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2017
Origin-state institutions dedicated to emigrants and their descendants have been largely unnoticed by mainstream political studies even though diaspora institutions are now found in over half the countries of the world. In response, we first develop alternative theories explaining diaspora institution emergence. They emerge to: 'tap' diasporas for resources vital to origin-state development and security; 'embrace' diasporas to help define origin-state political identity and achieve domestic political goals; or 'govern' diasporas in ways that demonstrate origin-state adherence to global norms. Second, we investigate empirical support for these tapping, embracing and governing explanations in regression and related analyses of diaspora institution emergence in 113 origin states observed from 1992 to 2012. Findings suggest support for all three perspectives with more robust evidentiary support for governing. Our analyses suggest several directions for future research on how and why diaspora institutions emerge for different origin-state purposes.