Meat, fish and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (original) (raw)

Abstract

Background: Current evidence suggests that high red meat intake is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. High fi sh intake may be associated with a decreased risk, but the existing evidence is less convincing. Methods: We prospectively followed 478 040 men and women from 10 European countries who were free of cancer at enrollment between 1992 and 1998. Information on diet and lifestyle was collected at baseline. After a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 1329 incident colorectal cancers were documented. We examined the relationship between intakes of red and processed meat, poultry, and fi sh and colorectal cancer risk using a proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, energy (nonfat and fat sources), height, weight, workrelated physical activity, smoking status, dietary fi ber and folate, and alcohol consumption, stratifi ed by center. A calibration substudy based on 36 994 subjects was used to correct hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confi dence intervals (CIs) for diet measurement errors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Colorectal cancer risk was positively associated with intake of red and processed meat (highest [>160 g/day] versus lowest [<20 g/day] intake, HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.88; P trend = .03) and inversely associated with intake of fi sh (>80 g/day versus <10 g/day, HR = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.54 to 0.88; P trend <.001), but was not related to poultry intake. Correcting for measurement error strengthened the associations between colorectal cancer and red and processed meat intake (per 100-g increase HR = 1.25, 95% CI =1.09 to 1.41, P trend = .001 and HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.02, P trend = .001 before and after calibration, respectively) and for fi sh (per 100 g increase HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.87, P trend <.001 and HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.77, P trend = .003; before and after correction, respectively). In this study population, the absolute risk of development of colorectal cancer within 10 years for a study subject aged 50 years was 1.71% for the highest category of red and processed meat intake and 1.28% for the lowest category of intake and was 1.86% for subjects in the lowest category of fi sh intake and 1.28% for subjects in the highest category of fi sh intake. Conclusions: Our data confi rm that colorectal cancer risk is positively associated with high consumption of red and processed meat and support an inverse association with fi sh intake.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (50)

  1. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Speizer FE. Relation of meat, fat, and fi ber intake to the risk of colon cancer in a prospective study among women. N Engl J Med 1990 ; 323 : 1664 -72.
  2. WCRF-AICR. Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997 .
  3. Norat T, Lukanova A, Ferrari P, Riboli E. Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer 2002 ; 98 : 241 -56.
  4. Sandhu MS, White IR, McPherson K. Systematic review of the prospec- tive cohort studies on meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analytical approach. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001 ; 10 : 439 -46.
  5. Wei EK, Giovannucci E, Wu K, Rosner B, Fuchs CS, Willett WC, et al. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2004 ; 108 : 433 -42.
  6. Flood A, Velie EM, Sinha R, Chaterjee N, Lacey JV Jr, Schairer C, et al. Meat, fat, and their subtypes as risk factors for colorectal cancer in a pro- spective cohort of women. Am J Epidemiol 2003 ; 158 : 59 -68.
  7. Chao A, Thun MJ, Connell CJ, McCullough ML, Jacobs EJ, Flanders WD, et al. Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2005 ; 293 : 172 -82.
  8. Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Ascherio A, Willett WC. Intake of fat, meat, and fi ber in relation to risk of colon cancer in men. Cancer Res 1994 ; 54 : 2390 -7.
  9. Bostick RM, Potter JD, Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Steinmetz KA, McKenzie DR, et al. Sugar, meat, and fat intake, and non-dietary risk factors for colon cancer incidence in Iowa women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1994 ; 5 : 38 -52.
  10. Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, van't Veer P, Brants HA, Dorant E, Sturmans F, et al. A prospective cohort study on the relation between meat consumption and the risk of colon cancer. Cancer Res 1994 ; 54 : 718 -23.
  11. Gaard M, Tretli S, Loken EB. Dietary factors and risk of colon cancer: a prospective study of 50,535 young Norwegian men and women. Eur J Cancer Prev 1996 ; 5 : 445 -54.
  12. Kato I, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig K, Toniolo PG, Shore RE, Riboli E. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study. Nutr Cancer 1997 ; 28 : 276 -81.
  13. Pietinen P, Malila N, Virtanen M, Hartman TJ, Tangrea JA, Albanes D, et al. Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men. Cancer Causes Control 1999 ; 10 : 387 -96.
  14. Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol 1998 ; 148 : 761 -74.
  15. Hsing AW, McLaughlin JK, Chow WH, Schuman LM, Co CH, Gridley G, et al. Risk factors for colorectal cancer in a prospective study among U.S. white men. Int J Cancer 1998 ; 77 : 549 -553.
  16. Tiemersma EW, Kampman E, Bueno de Mesquita HB, Bunschoten A, van Schothorst EM, Kok FJ, et al. Meat consumption, cigarette smoking, and genetic susceptibility in the etiology of colorectal cancer: results from a Dutch prospective study. Cancer Causes Control 2002 ; 13 : 383 -93.
  17. Kobayashi M, Tsubono Y, Otani T, Hanaoka T, Sobue T, Tsugane S; JPHC Study Group. Fish, long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and risk of colorectal cancer in middle-aged Japanese: the JPHC study. Nutr Cancer 2004 ; 49 : 32 -40.
  18. English DR, MacInnis RJ, Hodge AM, Hopper JL, Haydon AM, Giles GG. Red meat, chicken, and fi sh consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. Can- cer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004 ; 13 : 1509 -14.
  19. Larsson SC, Rafter J, Holmberg L, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Red meat consumption and risk of cancers of the proximal colon, distal colon and rectum: the Swedish Mammography Cohort. Int J Cancer 2005 ; 113 : 829 -34.
  20. Bingham S, Riboli E. Diet and cancer -the European Prospective Investiga- tion into Cancer and Nutrition. Nat Rev Cancer 2004 ; 4 : 206 -15.
  21. Two studies fi nd high-fi ber diet lowers colon cancer risk. CA Cancer J Clin 2003 ; 53 : 201 -2.
  22. Bingham SA, Day NE, Luben R, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Norat T, et al. Dietary fi bre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Pro- spective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet 2003 ; 361 : 1496 -501.
  23. Riboli E, Hunt KJ, Slimani N, Ferrari P, Norat T, Fahey M, et al. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study popula- tions and data collection. Public Health Nutr 2002 ; 5 : 1113 -24.
  24. Ferrari P, Slimani N, Ciampi A, Trichopoulou A, Naska A, Lauria C, et al. Evaluation of under-and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr 2002 ; 5 : 1329 -45.
  25. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Validity studies on dietary assessment methods. Int J Epidemiol 1997 ; 26 Suppl. 1: S1 -S189.
  26. Linseisen J, Kesse E, Slimani N, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Ocke MC, Skeie G, et al. Meat consumption in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorts: results from 24-hour dietary recalls. Public Health Nutr 2002 ; 5 : 1243 -58.
  27. Welch AA, Lund E, Amiano P, Dorronsoro M, Brustad M, Kumle M, et al. Variability of fi sh consumption within the 10 European countries participat- ing in the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr 2002 ; 5 : 1273 -85.
  28. Slimani N, Kaaks R, Ferrari P, Casagrande C, Clavel-Chapelon F, Lotze G, et al. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutr 2002 ; 5 : 1125 -45.
  29. Kaaks R, Plummer M, Riboli E, Esteve J, van Staveren W. Adjustment for bias due to errors in exposure assessments in multicenter cohort studies on diet and cancer: a calibration approach. Am J Clin Nutr 1994 ; 59 (Suppl 1): 245S -50S.
  30. Ferrari P, Kaaks R, Fahey M, Slimani N, Day NE, Pera G, et al. Within and between cohort variation in measured macro-nutrient intakes in the EPIC study taking account of measurement errors. Am J Epidemiol 2004 ; 160 : 814 -22.
  31. Rosner B, Gore R. Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiol- ogy based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2001 ; 154 : 827 -35.
  32. Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Introduction to stratifi ed analysis. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, editors. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven; 1998 . p. 53 -79.
  33. Rohrmann S, Linseisen J, Becker N, Norat T, Sinha R, Skeie G, et al. Cook- ing of meat and fi sh in Europe -results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Eur J Clin Nutr 2002 ; 56 : 1216 -30.
  34. Cross AJ, Pollock JR, Bingham SA. Haem, not protein or inorganic iron, is responsible for endogenous intestinal N-nitrosation arising from red meat. Cancer Res 2003 ; 63 : 2358 -60.
  35. Bingham SA, Hughes R, Cross AJ. Effect of white versus red meat on endogenous N-nitrosation in the human colon and further evidence of a dose response. J Nutr 2002 ; 132 (11 Suppl): 3522S -5S.
  36. Sugimura T. Nutrition and dietary carcinogens. Carcinogenesis 2000 ; 21 : 387 -95.
  37. Sachse C, Smith G, Wilkie MJ, Barrett JH, Waxman R, Sullivan F, et al. A pharmacogenetic study to investigate the role of dietary carcinogens in the etiology of colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis 2002 ; 23 : 1839 -49.
  38. Kampman E, Slattery ML, Bigler J, Leppert M, Samowitz W, Caan BJ, et al. Meat consumption, genetic susceptibility, and colon cancer risk: a United States multicenter case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999 ; 8 : 15 -24.
  39. Lang NP, Butler MA, Massengill J, Lawson M, Stotts RC, Hauer-Jensen M, et al. Rapid metabolic phenotypes for acetyltransferase and cytochrome P4501A2 and putative exposure to food-borne heterocyclic amines increase the risk for colorectal cancer or polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994 ; 3 : 675 -82.
  40. Roberts-Thomson IC, Butler WJ, Ryan P. Meat, metabolic genotypes and risk for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 1999 ; 8 : 207 -11.
  41. Murtaugh MA, Sweeney C, Ma KN, Caan BJ, Slattery ML. The CYP 1A1 genotype may alter the association of meat consumption patterns and preparation with the risk of colorectal cancer in men and women. J Nutr 2005 ; 135 : 179 -86.
  42. Larsson SC, Kumlin M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Wolk A. Dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids for the prevention of cancer: a review of potential mecha- nisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2004 ; 79 : 935 -45.
  43. Kaaks R, Riboli E, van Staveren W. Calibration of dietary intake measure- ments in prospective cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol 1995 ; 142 : 548 -56.
  44. Willett W. Commentary: Dietary diaries versus food frequency questionnaires -a case of undigestible data. Int J Epidemiol 2001 ; 30 : 317 -9.
  45. Jakes RW, Day NE, Luben R, Welch A, Bingham S, Mitchell J, et al. Adjust- ing for energy intake -what measure to use in nutritional epidemiological studies? Int J Epidemiol 2004 ; 33 : 1382 -6.
  46. Day N, McKeown N, Wong M, Welch A, Bingham S. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium. Int J Epidemiol 2001 ; 30 : 309 -17.
  47. Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, Freedman LS, Li L. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies. Am J Epidemiol 1999 ; 150 : 642 -51.
  48. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman L, Bingham S, Day NE, Riboli E, et al. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 2002 ; 5 : 915 -23.
  49. Slimani N, Bingham S, Runswick S, Ferrari P, Day NE, Welch AA, et al. Group level validation of protein intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall and dietary questionnaires against 24-hour urinary nitrogen in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 ; 12 : 784 -95.
  50. Willett WC. Balancing life-style and genomics research for disease prevention. Science 2002 ; 296 : 695 -8.