ANSWER TO INQUIRES ABOUT THE KAMPUNG TYPE OF SETTLEMENT AND THE PROCESS OF ITS FORMATION (Journal of Archit. Plann. Environ. Engng, AIJ, No.433, Mar., 1992) (original) (raw)

2014

掲載誌のサブタイトル: ハラスメント法理の展開／平和本稿の内容の多くは．研究文化研究会での湯川，横山とのデイスカッション，調査，日本社会学会他での共同報告などをふまえたものである。また，本稿は．文部科学省科学研究費補助金（基盤C)：課題番号21510209 研究課題名「ハラスメントや性差別を生み出す各学問分野の構造分析」，および（基盤C）：課題番号24530629 研究課題名「アカデミック・ハラスメントを生み出す研究スタイルおよび研究組織の分析」（研究代表者北仲千里）の成果の一部である

A Study on Planning Idea of Tsuyoshi Tamura and Keiji Uehara based on Mt. Kongo National Park Plan

Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2016

There was a dispute over the concept of national parks between Tsuyoshi Tamura and Keiji Uehara during the 1920's, and each made his own "Mt. Kongo National Park Plan" later in 1930. In this study, planning Idea of national parks by Tsuyoshi Tamura is discussed after identifying similarities and differences of the two through the analysis process of "Mt. Kongo National Park Plan". As a result, the following points have been clarified. Uehara's concept and resources of national parks change over time. During the 1920's, Uehara considered national parks as a conservation district for natural treasures and excluded landscape to consider as their resource; however, he regarded landscape as a main resource in 1930. On the other hand, Tamura's establishment of a park area was based on conditions such as a visible area of landscape and land ownership (prioritized forests owned by the nation and temples, and avoided private property), and to secure a vast size of the unity area. Lastly, Uehara prioritized history and culture as resources of a national park; whereas Tamura prioritized natural landscape and did not value traditional landscape.

Considerations on Urban Formation and Division of Housing Lots of Paramaribo, Suriname

Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), 2005

CLarifying the block formation and division of housing lots in Pararriaribo ， this paper discusses the in伽 ence and rnodification of Dutch colo 皿 ial city planning in Surinarne ． Pararriarib 。 is one 。 f the uniquely preserved Dutch colonial towns in Caribbean Regions ． With numerous historical buildings and wooden houses ， Paramaribo was registered as one efthe UNESCO Wor 国 d CultUTal Heritage sites in 2002 ． This paper is based on the research preject that had been laumched under the title 「 Field Research en Orig血， Transf ｛) r 呶 ion ， ConveySion and Conservation ofUrban Space ofCoionial Cities ' ， the major target ef which are 血e Dutch Oolonial cities．］ rb compare the colonial cities all over the world is ambitious objective oflhe pr〔) ject ． The Dutch is well known as a developer of high densed setdement and townhouses ， One of 血 e major fe。uses ef this paper is to clarify how the Dutch planned the block and housing lots in Paramaribo ． The paper nrsUy studies the history of 偵じ process ofestab 正 ishrnent and development of Pararnaribo and the considerations on the bleck fbrmation and division of housing lots ． Analy2ing historical maps in terms o 圸 e block fommation planned in the late 18止 c 。 ntUry ， this paper ciarifies that the planning ofthe blocks was basod on 血 ¢ unit of measurement called Rijinlandse Reede． An面 om the Oomparison with 血e grid p磁 em of Cape

ANSWER TO INQUIRES ABOUT THE KAMPUNG TYPE OF SETTLEMENT AND THE PROCESS OF ITS FORMATION (Journal of Archit. Plann. Environ. Engng, AIJ, No.433, Mar., 1992) (original) (raw)

Related papers