ANSWER TO INQUIRES ABOUT THE KAMPUNG TYPE OF SETTLEMENT AND THE PROCESS OF ITS FORMATION (Journal of Archit. Plann. Environ. Engng, AIJ, No.433, Mar., 1992) (original) (raw)
The Kellwasser Events in the Upper Devonian Xom Nha Formation, Central Vietnam
Journal of the Sedimentological Society of Japan, 2020
The Frasnian-Famennian (F-F) boundary occurs within the Upper Devonian Xom Nha Formation in Quang Binh Province, Central Vietnam. The stratotype section of the Xom Nha Formation (bed numbers Xo 1-39) comprises carbonates, and is divided into Unit I (Xo 1-13) mainly composed of whitish-gray bioclastic grainstone and wackestone, Unit II (Xo 14-28) dominated by bioclastic packstone and wackestone, and Unit III (Xo 29-39) characterized by weakly parallel laminated gray to dark gray lime-mudstone. Units I-III commonly contain wellpreserved conodonts and ostracods. Some horizons of Unit II yield brachiopods, ammonoids, nautiloids, bivalves, tentaculitoids, crinoids and acritarchs. Age diagnostic conodont species of the Frasnian Palmatolepis linguiformis is commonly obtained from the upper part of Unit II. Unit III yields Pa. delicatula that is characteristic of the lowermost Famennian Pa. triangularis conodont Biozone. Two positive carbon isotope excursions are recognized, the lower excursion peaking in Unit I whilst the upper excursion peaks just below the local Frasnian-Famennian boundary (bed number Xo 28). Based on the biostratigraphy, these excursions equate to the Lower and Upper Kellwasser events. In the upper part of Unit II (Pa. linguiformis Biozone, bed numbers Xo 16-23), relatively diverse marine assemblages are recognized, indicating a temporal recovery of ecosystem after the Lower Kellwasser Event. By contrast, the diversity of lowermost Famennian marine organisms decreased markedly after the Upper Kellwasser event.
2014
掲載誌のサブタイトル: ハラスメント法理の展開／平和本稿の内容の多くは．研究文化研究会での湯川，横山とのデイスカッション，調査，日本社会学会他での共同報告などをふまえたものである。また，本稿は．文部科学省科学研究費補助金（基盤C)：課題番号21510209 研究課題名「ハラスメントや性差別を生み出す各学問分野の構造分析」，および（基盤C）：課題番号24530629 研究課題名「アカデミック・ハラスメントを生み出す研究スタイルおよび研究組織の分析」（研究代表者北仲千里）の成果の一部である
A Study on Planning Idea of Tsuyoshi Tamura and Keiji Uehara based on Mt. Kongo National Park Plan
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2016
There was a dispute over the concept of national parks between Tsuyoshi Tamura and Keiji Uehara during the 1920's, and each made his own "Mt. Kongo National Park Plan" later in 1930. In this study, planning Idea of national parks by Tsuyoshi Tamura is discussed after identifying similarities and differences of the two through the analysis process of "Mt. Kongo National Park Plan". As a result, the following points have been clarified. Uehara's concept and resources of national parks change over time. During the 1920's, Uehara considered national parks as a conservation district for natural treasures and excluded landscape to consider as their resource; however, he regarded landscape as a main resource in 1930. On the other hand, Tamura's establishment of a park area was based on conditions such as a visible area of landscape and land ownership (prioritized forests owned by the nation and temples, and avoided private property), and to secure a vast size of the unity area. Lastly, Uehara prioritized history and culture as resources of a national park; whereas Tamura prioritized natural landscape and did not value traditional landscape.