The base pair-scale diffusion of nucleosomes modulates binding of transcription factors (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nucleosome mobility and the regulation of gene expression: Insights from single-molecule studies
Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017
Nucleosomes at the promoters of genes regulate the accessibility of the transcription machinery to DNA, and function as a basic layer in the complex regulation of gene expression. Our understanding of the role of the nucleosome's spontaneous, thermally driven position changes in modulating expression is lacking. This is the result of the paucity of experimental data on these dynamics, at high-resolution, and for DNA sequences that belong to real, transcribed genes. We have developed an assay that uses partial, reversible unzipping of nucleosomes with optical tweezers to repeatedly probe a nucleosome's position over time. Using the nucleosomes at the promoters of two model genes, Cga and Lhb, we show that the mobility of nucleosomes is modulated by the sequence of DNA and by the use of alternative histone variants, and describe how the mobility can affect transcription, at the initiation and elongation phases.
Nucleosomes, the basic building block of chromatin, regulate the accessibility of the transcription machinery to DNA. Recent studies have revealed that the nucleosome's spontaneous, thermally driven positional dynamics are modulated by different factors, and exploited by the cell as a regulatory mechanism. In particular, enrichment of mobile nucleosomes at the promoters of genes suggests that the mobility of nucleosomes may affect the ability of transcription factors to bind DNA. However, a quantitative model describing the effect nucleosome mobility on the effective affinity of transcription factors is lacking. We present here a simple equilibrium model that captures the essence of the effect, and show that modulation of the nucleosome's mobility can be a potent and versatile regulator of transcription factor binding.
H2A.Z controls the stability and mobility of nucleosomes to regulate expression of the LH genes
The structure and dynamics of promoter chromatin have a profound effect on the expression levels of genes. Yet, the contribution of DNA sequence, histone post-translational modifications, histone variant usage and other factors in shaping the architecture of chro-matin, and the mechanisms by which this architecture modulates expression of specific genes are not yet completely understood. Here we use optical tweezers to study the roles that DNA sequence and the histone variant H2A.Z have in shaping the chromatin landscape at the promoters of two model genes, Cga and Lhb. Guided by MNase mapping of the promoters of these genes, we reconstitute nucleosomes that mimic those located near the transcriptional start site and immediately downstream (รพ 1), and measure the forces required to disrupt these nucleosomes, and their mobility along the DNA sequence. Our results indicate that these genes are basally regulated by two distinct strategies, making use of H2A.Z to modulate separate phases of transcription, and highlight how DNA sequence, alternative histone variants and remodelling machinery act synergistically to modulate gene expression.
ABSTRACTHow transcription factors (TFs) navigate the complex nuclear environment to assemble the transcriptional machinery at specific genomic loci remains elusive. Using single-molecule tracking, coupled with machine learning, we examined the mobility of multiple transcriptional regulators. We show that H2B and ten different transcriptional regulators display two distinct low-mobility states. Our results indicate that both states represent dynamic interactions with chromatin. Ligand activation results in a dramatic increase in the proportion of steroid receptors in the lowest mobility state. Mutational analysis revealed that only chromatin interactions in the lowest mobility state require an intact DNA-binding domain as well as oligomerization domains. Importantly, these states are not spatially separated as previously believed but in fact, individual H2B and TF molecules can dynamically switch between them. Together, our results identify two unique and distinct low-mobility states...
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 2012
Precise expression of specific genes in time and space is at the basis of cellular viability as well as correct development of organisms. Understanding the mechanisms of gene regulation is fundamental and still one of the great challenges for biology. Gene expression is regulated also by specific transcription factors that recognize and bind to specific DNA sequences. Transcription factors dynamics, and especially the way they sample the nucleoplasmic space during the search for their specific target in the genome, are a key aspect for regulation and it has been puzzling researchers for forty years. The scope of this review is to give a state-of-the-art perspective over the intra-nuclear mobility and the target search mechanisms of specific transcription factors at the molecular level. Going through the seminal biochemical experiments that have raised the first questions about target localization and the theoretical grounds concerning target search processes, we describe the most recent experimental achievements and current challenges in understanding transcription factors dynamics and interactions with DNA using in vitro assays as well as in live prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Nuclear Transport and RNA Processing.
Extrinsic and intrinsic nucleosome positioning signals
Eprint Arxiv 0805 4017, 2008
In eukaryotic genomes, nucleosomes function to compact DNA and to regulate access to it both by simple physical occlusion and by providing the substrate for numerous covalent epigenetic tags. While nucleosome positions in vitro are determined by sequence alone, in vivo competition with other DNA-binding factors and action of chromatin remodeling enzymes play a role that needs to be quantified. We developed a biophysical model for the sequence dependence of DNA bending energies, and validated it against a collection of in vitro free energies of nucleosome formation and a nucleosome crystal structure; we also successfully designed both strong and poor histone binding sequences ab initio. For in vivo data from S.cerevisiae, the strongest positioning signal came from the competition with other factors. Based on sequence alone, our model predicts that functional transcription factor binding sites have a tendency to be covered by nucleosomes, but are uncovered in vivo because functional sites cluster within a single nucleosome footprint, making transcription factors bind cooperatively. Similarly a weak enhancement of nucleosome binding in the TATA region for naked DNA becomes a strong depletion when the TATA-binding protein is included, in quantitative agreement with experiment. Predictions at specific loci were also greatly enhanced by including competing factors. Our physically grounded model distinguishes multiple ways in which genomic sequence can influence nucleosome positions and thus provides an alternative explanation for several important experimental findings.
2010
Genome wide maps of nucleosome occupancy in yeast have recently been produced through deep sequencing of nuclease-protected DNA. These maps have been obtained from both crosslinked and uncrosslinked chromatin in vivo, and from chromatin assembled from genomic DNA and nucleosomes in vitro. Here, we analyze these maps in combination with existing ChIP-chip data, and with new ChIP-qPCR experiments reported here. We show that the apparent nucleosome density in crosslinked chromatin, when compared to uncrosslinked chromatin, is preferentially increased at transcription factor (TF) binding sites, suggesting a strategy for mapping generic transcription factor binding sites that would not require immunoprecipitation of a particular factor. We also confirm previous conclusions that the intrinsic, sequence dependent binding of nucleosomes helps determine the localization of TF binding sites. However, we find that the association between low nucleosome occupancy and TF binding is typically greater if occupancy at a site is averaged over a 600bp window, rather than using the occupancy at the binding site itself. We have also incorporated intrinsic nucleosome binding occupancies as weights in a computational model for TF binding, and by this measure as well we find better prediction if the high resolution nucleosome occupancy data is averaged over 600bp. We suggest that the intrinsic DNA binding specificity of nucleosomes plays a role in TF binding site selection not so much through the specification of precise nucleosome positions that permit or occlude binding, but rather through the creation of low occupancy regions that can accommodate competition from TFs through rearrangement of nucleosomes.
Nucleosome Dynamics during Transcription Elongation
ACS Chemical Biology, 2020
The nucleosome is the basic packing unit of the eukaryotic genome. Dynamic interactions between DNA and histones in the nucleosome are the molecular basis of gene accessibility regulation that governs the kinetics of various DNA-templated processes such as transcription elongation by RNA Polymerase II (Pol II). Based on single-molecule FRET measurements with chemically modified histones, we investigated the nucleosome dynamics during transcription elongation and how it is affected by histone acetylation at H3 K56 and the histone chaperone Nap1, both of which can affect DNA-histone interactions. We observed that H3K56 acetylation dramatically shortens the pause duration of Pol II near the entry region of the nucleosome, while Nap1 induces no noticeable difference. We also found that the elongation rate of Pol II through the nucleosome is unaffected by the acetylation or Nap1. These results indicate that H3K56 acetylation facilitates Pol II translocation through the nucleosome by assisting paused Pol II to resume and that Nap1 does not affect Pol II progression. Following transcription, only a small fraction of nucleosomes remain intact, which is unaffected by H3K56 acetylation or Nap1. These results suggest that (i) spontaneous nucleosome opening enables Pol II progression, (ii) Pol II mediates nucleosome reassembly very inefficiently, and (iii) Nap1 in the absence of other factors does not promote nucleosome disassembly or reassembly during transcription.
Nucleic Acids Res, 2014
Previous studies have analyzed patterns of transcription, transcription factor (TF) binding or mapped nucleosome occupancy across the genome. These suggest that the three aspects are genetically connected but the cause and effect relationships are still unknown. For example, physiologic TF binding studies involve many TFs, consequently, it is difficult to assign nucleosome reorganization to the binding site occupancy of any particular TF. Therefore, several aspects remain unclear: does TF binding influence nucleosome (re)organizations locally or impact the chromatin landscape at a more global level; are all or only a fraction of TF binding a result of reorganization in nucleosome occupancy and do all TF binding and associated changes in nucleosome occupancy result in altered gene expression? With these in mind, following characterization of two states (before and after induction of a single TF of choice) we determined: (i) genomic binding sites of the TF, (ii) promoter nucleosome occupancy and (iii) transcriptome profiles. Results demonstrated that promoter-proximal TF binding influenced expression of the target gene when it was coupled to nucleosome repositioning at or close to its binding site in most cases. In contrast, only in few cases change in target gene expression was found when TF binding occurred without local nucleosome reorganization.
Nucleosomes accelerate transcription factor dissociation
Nucleic Acids Research, 2014
Transcription factors (TF) bind DNA-target sites within promoters to activate gene expression. TFs target their DNA-recognition sequences with high specificity by binding with resident times of up to hours in vitro. However, in vivo TFs can exchange on the order of seconds. The factors that regulate TF dynamics in vivo and increase dissociation rates by orders of magnitude are not known. We investigated TF binding and dissociation dynamics at their recognition sequence within duplex DNA, single nucleosomes and short nucleosome arrays with single molecule total internal reflection fluorescence (smTIRF) microscopy. We find that the rate of TF dissociation from its site within either nucleosomes or nucleosome arrays is increased by 1000-fold relative to duplex DNA. Our results suggest that TF binding within chromatin could be responsible for the dramatic increase in TF exchange in vivo. Furthermore, these studies demonstrate that nucleosomes regulate DNA-protein interactions not only by preventing DNA-protein binding but by dramatically increasing the dissociation rate of protein complexes from their DNAbinding sites.