Political Selection (original) (raw)

Abstract

Almost every major episode of economic change over the past 200 years of political history has been associated with key personalities coming to power with a commitment to these changes. But if such dynamic leaders are so important, then we need to understand how they come to hold the reins of power. This outcome could be viewed as largely the product of random events colored by idiosyncratic personalities and chance encounters. However, at least some role must be given to the underlying institutional structure, which has a more systematic influence on who rises to the top. Thus, it is essential to understand how political selection works.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

How does political selection impact policy credibility among elected officials?add

The paper finds that effective political selection enhances policy credibility, as evidenced by Paul Volcker's role in the 1980s, which underscored the significance of selecting competent leaders for credible policy implementation.

What historical examples illustrate the consequences of inadequate political selection?add

The Labour Party in the UK struggled for 18 years until Tony Blair's selection illustrated how selecting the right leader could re-establish credibility and electoral success.

What role does identity play in political representation and selection?add

Evidence from India reveals that reserved legislative seats for disadvantaged groups significantly affect policies targeted towards these communities, highlighting the importance of identity in political selection.

How do electoral institutions influence the quality of political candidates?add

The study indicates that electoral diversity, such as campaign finance laws and media freedom, significantly impacts the quality and selection of politicians, emphasizing the need for systematic selection processes.

In what ways can selection mechanisms be improved in political systems?add

Improving voter access to information about candidates and enhancing transparency in candidate selection processes can lead to better quality politicians, as noted in examples from U.S. democracy.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (25)

  1. Akerlof, George A. and Rachel E. Kranton. 2005. "Identity and the Economics of Organiza- tions." Journal of Economic Perspectives. Winter, 19:1, pp. 9 -32.
  2. Alesina, Alberto. 1988. "Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Ratio- nal Voters." American Economic Review. 78:4, pp. 796 -806.
  3. American Bar Association Journal. 1977. 63, 171. Barro, Robert. 1973. "The Control of Politi- cians: An Economic Model." Public Choice. Spring, 14, pp. 19 -42.
  4. Bertrand, Marianne and Antoinette Schoar. 2003. "Managing with Style: The Effect of Man- agers on Firm Policies." Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomic. 118:4, pp. 1169 -207.
  5. Besley, Timothy and Anne Case. 1995. "Does Political Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence From Gubernatorial Term Limits." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110:3, pp. 769 -98.
  6. Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate. 1997. "An Economic Model of Representative Democ- racy." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112:1, pp. 85-114.
  7. Besley, Timothy and Maitreesh Ghatak. 2005. "Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents." American Economic Review. 95:3, pp. 616 -36.
  8. Besley, Timothy and Andrea Prat. 2004. "Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability." Typescript. Political Selection 59
  9. Besley, Timothy and Michael Smart. 2004. "Fiscal Restraints and Voter Welfare." Typescript. Besley, Timothy, Rohini Pande and Biju Rao. 2005. "Political Selection and the Quality of Government: Evidence from South India." Typescript. Besley, Timothy, Torsten Persson and Daniel Sturm. 2005. "Political Competition and Eco- nomic Performance: Theory and Evidence from the United States." Typescript. Brunetti, Aymo and Beatrice Weder. 2003. "A Free Press is Bad News for Corruption." Journal of Public Economics. 87:7-8, pp. 1801-824. Buchanan, James M. 1989. "The Public- Choice Perspective," in Essays on the Political Econ- omy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 13-24.
  10. Caselli, Francesco and Massimo Morelli. 2004. "Bad Politicians." Journal of Public Economics. 88: 3-4, pp. 759 -82.
  11. Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra and Esther Du- flo. 2004. "Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a India-Wide Randomized Policy Experi- ment." Econometrica. 72:5, pp. 1409 -444.
  12. Coate, Stephen. 2004. "Pareto-Improving Campaign Finance Policy." American Economic Re- view. 94:3, pp. 628 -55.
  13. Cooter, Robert D. 2002. "Who Gets on Top in Democracy?: Elections as Filters." Working Pa- per Series No. 74, Berkeley Olin Program in Law and Economics. Diermeier, Daniel, Michael Keane and Anto- nio Merlo. 2005. "A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers." American Economic Re- view. Forthcoming. Djankov, Simeon, Caralee McLeish, Tatiana Nenova and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. "Who Owns the Media?" Journal of Law and Economics. 46:2, pp. 341-82.
  14. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Bros. Ferejohn, John. 1986. "Incumbent Perfor- mance and Electoral Control." Public Choice. Fall, 50, pp. 5-25.
  15. Frey, Bruno S. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Chelten- ham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Gehlbach, Scott and Konstantin Sonin. 2004. "Businessman Candidates: Special Interest Poli- tics in Weakly Institutionalized Environments." Typescript. Jefferson, Thomas. 1813. "The Natural Aris- tocracy." Letter to John Adams, October 28. Jones, Benjamin F. and Benjamin A. Olken. 2004. "Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth Since World War II." Quarterly Jour- nal of Economics. Forthcoming.
  16. Key, V. O. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Lee, David S., Enrico Moretti and Matthew Butler. 2004. "Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U.S. House." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 119:3, pp. 807-60.
  17. Liebenberg, M. 1956. "Income of Lawyers in the Postwar Period: Factors Affecting the Distri- bution of Earnings." Survey of Current Business. 36:12, pp. 3-6.
  18. Madison, James. 1788 (1961). The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays in Support of the Con- stitution of the United States. New York: Doubleday. Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Repre- sentative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press. National Commission on the Public Service. 2003. "Urgent Business For America: Revitaliz- ing the Federal Government for the 21st Cen- tury." Available at ͗http://www.brookings.edu/ dybdocroot/gs/cps/volcker/reportfind.pdf͘. Osborne, Martin J. and Al Slivinski. 1996. "A Model of Political Competition with Citizen Can- didates." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 111:1, pp. 65-96.
  20. Pande, Rohini. 2003. "Minority Representa- tion and Policy Choices: The Significance of Legislator Identity." American Economic Review. 93:4, pp. 1132-151.
  21. Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini. 1994. "Representative Democracy and Capital Taxa- tion." Journal of Public Economics. 55:1, pp. 53-70.
  22. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Prince- ton University Press.
  23. Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Col- lapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Rogoff, Kenneth. 1985. "The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 100:4, pp. 1169 -189.
  24. Shiller, Robert. 2005. "How Wall Street Learns to Look the Other Way." New York Times. Febru- ary 8, op-ed.
  25. Veronese, Barbara. 2005. "Representation, Policy Making and Accountability: Learning From Changes in Democratic Institutions." Un- published Ph.D. thesis, chapter 4, London School of Economics. Worthington, Sarah. 2002. Equity. Oxford: Ox- ford University Press.