Internationally Active, Visible, High Impact, and Eminent Romanian Psychologists. a Quantitative Analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE EVOLUTION OF ROMANIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY BETWEEN 1938 AND 2008 1
Romanian psychology has undergone extensive transformations over the past 70 years, in relation to social and political changes that took place in Romanian society during this period. After building an internationally recognized status by the year 1938, the establishment of the totalitarian regime in 1948 had a negative influence on psychology, essentially on ideological grounds. Of course, during this period of over 40 years, there were several stages in terms of intensity of interference. After the Revolution that led to the process of democratisation in 1989 we can witness the rebirth of psychology in Romania and its gradual reconnecting to mainstream psychology. In this paper, we trace how these broad changes are reflected in the Romanian psychology books published in the last 70 years, relating them to the evolution of Romanian society.
Publishing Psychology In Romania: Past Challenges, Present Opportunities and Future Perspectives
… of the workshop on European psychology …, 2009
The present paper will review Romanian psychology publications and will put a particular emphasis on both the process and current conditions of publishing psychology materials in this country. The article will be structured around three main sections. First, in order to have a broad image of how psychology developed as a science and the challenges it had to face in Romania, a short description of the general context will be offered. The body of the paper will present the key Romanian psychology journals along with other sources, like magazines or online materials, portraying the series of opportunities authors have nowadays to publish their work. The discussion will include high-rated academic journals, academic journals that are edited by universities or professional associations, as well as magazines offering more "popular" versions of psychology. A particular interest will be given to student journals since they represent a niche in the field and emerged from the students' need to make their voice heard and to prepare for an active professional life as future psychologists. One such initiative will be discussed at length: the case of Europe's Journal of Psychology, an online open access publication edited by a group of volunteers originally from the University of Bucharest. In the end, a section will be dedicated to the synthesis of the main advantages and disadvantages of the Romanian psychology publishing system and the ways in which a European Publication Platform could answer the needs of both authors and readers in Romania and not only.
LANDMARKS IN THE EVOLUTION OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY IN ROMANIA 1
The development of scientific psychology in Romania begins in the late nineteenth century under the auspices of the new methodological paradigm of experimentalism. After Eduard Gruber established the first experimental psychology laboratory in 1893 in Iasi, Romania becoming the tenth country in the world to have such a laboratory, the new current was strongly supported by the local scientific community. Constantin Rădulescu-Motru (1906) and later Florian Ştefănescu-Goangă (1921), disciples of Wundt, as Gruber in fact, succeeded to to implement experimental psychology as the main direction in Romanian psychology, which in the interwar period came to an unanimous international recognition. The landmarks of the evolution of experimental psychology in Romania, as presented in this article are meant to invite the community of psychologists to initiate a debate, from the historical point of view, on the Romanian experimental psychology, especially after the social and epistemic changes that followed during the totalitarian and postdecembrist period. We believe that a historical perspective on the evolution of the experimental psychology in Romania is a challenge for the entire scientific community of Romanian psychologists. The first argument on the matter, a more general one, focuses on the role of the experimentalism in strengthening scientific psychology. We know that psychology, at least until the eve of the second half of the nineteenth century, did not enjoy the status of independent science. French philosopher Auguste Comte, the founder of positivism (doctrine with remarkable influence in the nineteenth century and early twentieth century), considered psychology at that time as a sub-branch of biology. The dominant pattern in terms of science was certainly derived from the field of natural sciences and it is not surprising that the pioneers of experimental research in psychology came from this area. In this respect we mention
Hungarian contributions to modern psychology
2004
Traditions of History Writing in Psychology I wish to argue in this paper that in terms of its sociological background psychology is not entirely neutralized and decontextualized as a science. Therefore in analyzing its trends there is something to be learned from its national characteristics, beyond the mere fact of there being national differences. The Linear View: A Caricature The received or accepted tradition of historiography in psychology is one of the linear traditions. This conception is present in points of views emphasizing an unbroken and monocentric image of the unfolding of this young discipline. They assume several linearities. (i) There is a clear development from psychology characterized by an unarticulated, speculative view on human nature and especially an understanding of the mind and behavior contaminated by considerations of philosophy and, even worse, religion, toward an end point, the implied goal, which is a solid and reliable view of the human mind based on disinterested natural science. (ii) According to this view, psychology as a modern science, as a profession, as well as a disciplinary subject taught at universities had articulated itself starting from the world of academia "downward." There is one center for modernization in this linear perspective: that of the leading universities and their theoretical approaches. These may change over time, such as moving from a mentalistic psychology to a behavioral one, but at any given period there is only one center. The center may change nationally as well. It may move from Germany to the United States, but there still would only be one true center at any given time. All the rest like Russian-Soviet psychology, or Spanish language psychology with its The author was a fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, California, while working on this paper, and supported by a Gardner Lindzey fellowship of the Mellon Foundation. The advice of Gerry Clore and the bibliographical help of László Sera is gratefully acknowledged.
2012
The journal is devoted to the advancement of applied psychology. It publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and practice oriented articles covering topics relevant to various fields of applied psychology. Whereas particular consideration is given to empirical articles using quantitative methodology, the journal will publish the full range of articles including but not limited to empirical qualitative studies, short research reports, meta-analyses, methodological papers or literature reviews. The manuscripts should be written in English or in Romanian, according to the American Psychological Association (APA) last edition standards. All charts and figures should be attached separately in a .ttf or in a .gif format. All manuscripts should have an English abstract of maximum 150 words, as well as 5 to 7 keywords in English. There are no limitations regarding the length of the manuscript, however the authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts with less than 10,000 words. Add...
Hungarian psychology in context. Reclaiming the past
Hungarian Studies 30 (1), 17-55, 2016
Psychology is a socio-cultural phenomenon with intricate roots in the particulars of time and space. The “contextualizing” and “internationalizing” of the history of psychology is an ongoing project, however, Central Europe, as a coherent perspective, and the history of Hungarian psychology specifically, is acutely missing in current surveys of international psychology, and more broadly, in “western consciousness”. This paper is an attempt at presenting a comprehensive, socially and politically contextualized framework of the history of Hungarian psychology, from its beginnings until the fall of communism, in 1989. Hungarian psychology emanated in the emerging modernity of Central Europe, in the second half of the 19th Century, in the framework of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Academic psychology and the psychology profession developed in attunement with the German speaking world, however, political events drastically intervened throughout the 20th century. This paper situates the history of psychology in the history of Hungary, since without this broader background Hungarian psychology cannot be treated as a contextualized phenomenon. Reconstructing the history of Hungarian psychology is, at the same time, reclaiming the past, since continuity with, and remembrance of the past was once forcefully obstructed by the communist regime, and the effects proved to be long lasting. In this paper I aim to show how Hungarian psychology was, in part, a genuine “extension” of psychology as it developed in Germany, Austria, and more broadly in Europe, but also a unique and remarkable phenomenon rooted in specific conditions, which were greatly shaped by socio-political history. Scholarship on the history of Hungarian psychology is growing fast, but the richness of this history has yet to be more fully explored and appreciated, inside and outside of Hungary.
The Image of Psychoanalysis in Romanian Communist Propaganda
2017
In 1932, a conference dedicated to Sigmund Freud was banned by the Romanian authorities, because they wanted to avoid "communist propaganda". Twenty years later, psychoanalysis was once again officially banned, this time by the communist authorities. Because it was considered a bourgeois and a reactionary science, psychoanalysis could not be tolerated by the new regime. More than that, the psychoanalytical practice involved many risks for both psychoanalyst and patient. Not only the practice, but also the publication of works in this field was strictly forbidden. Especially in the first ten years after World War II, psychoanalysis was criticised in various books, articles and even in the press. Therefore, the progresses made by the Romanian physicians in the interwar period ceased and the most important accomplishments in this area were overshadowed by those of the communist scientists.
Psychology and Politics: Intersections of Science and Ideology in the History of Psy-Sciences
2019
Psy-sciences (psychology, psychiatry, psychoanalysis, pedagogy, criminology, special education, etc.) have been connected to politics in diverse ways during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. This relationship manifests itself either through direct political pressure or through more general and subtle interactions between cultural and social processes and scientific currents and practices. The book collects ideas and findings on the history and politics of psy-sciences including scientific and theoretical discourses, institutions, and professionals. This volume will allow us to compare the development of the psy-sciences and the institutions in which they are practiced in Eastern European with developments in other regions. Concerning the history of these disciplines, demarcations and shifts instigated by power relations can be found within scientific movements and schools in the field of psychology, psychiatry, and psychoanalysis. But when closely investigated, politics can also be grasped in the epistemology of psysciences and in the governmental practices based on them. Human relations, emotions, everyday ethical principles, etc. have become conceivable in psychological terms, thus giving way to practices of normalization, as well as their utilization and manipulation by political decision-makers and diverse institutions. What is the form and dissemination of certain regimes of truth as they are reformed and as they become the center of old and new ideological struggles? What are the historical-political processes that influence the fields of psy-knowledge, inducing transformations of professional perceptions of the 1 The research team was formed within the Social and Cultural Psychology Group of the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The team was headed by Anna Borgos and its members included Balázs Berkovits, Ferenc Erős, Melinda Friedrich, Júlia Gyimesi, Melinda Kovai, and Dóra Máriási. The research was funded by the Hungarian National Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) between 2013 and 2017. The history of our research group goes back to the late 2000s, when the editors of the present volume, in collaboration with other colleagues, began their systematic explorations into the history of Hungarian psychoanalysis, as well as delved into the methodological and epistemological questions, gender issues, and cultural and political aspects related to it.