Coaching as a social process (original) (raw)

A critical analysis of the conceptualisation of ‘coaching philosophy’'

Abstract The aim of this paper was to critically review existing literature relating to, and critically analyse current conceptualisations of, ‘coaching philosophy’. The review reveals a bewildering approach to definitions, terms and frameworks that have limited explanation and reveal a lack of conceptual clarity. It is argued that rather than provide clarification and understanding the existing literature conflates coaching rhetoric and ideology with coaching philosophy and serves to reproduce existing coaching discourse rather than explain coaching practice. The paper problematises the unquestioned assumptions currently underpinning ‘coaching philosophy’; namely the overemphasis of coaches’ agency and reflexivity, the downplaying of the significance of social structure on coaches’ dispositions and the acceptance that coaching practice is an entirely conscious activity. The paper argues for an alternative philosophy of coaching that uses philosophic thinking to help coaches question existing ideology, and critically evaluate the assumptions and beliefs underpinning their practice. Keywords: Coaching philosophy, philosophical enquiry, coach education, coaching, critical analysis, ideology, coaching discourse.

Locating the coaching process in practice: Models ‘for’ and ‘of’ coaching

Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy

Despite an increasing recognition of the existence of a process of coaching, and a resulting increase in research activity, there remains a lack of a clear conceptual base for sports coaching. This situation has left coaching without a clear set of concepts and principles that reflect coaching practice. Purpose: The aim of this paper is to critically examine current conceptualisations of the coaching process, principally in terms of how they have been generated and their contribution to coaching knowledge. By exploring models for (idealistic representations) and of (empirically based) the coaching process, this paper examines the model's nature and conceptual underpinnings, in an attempt to position them within a broader framework of understanding coaching and the coaching process. Conclusions: The analysis suggests that the current set of models result in a representation of the coaching process that is often reduced in complexity and scale, and the essential social and cultural elements of the process are often underplayed. This is particularly illustrated through examining in-situ models of coaching practice, which identify coaching as a complex, interrelated and inter-dependent process that is firmly embedded within specific social and cultural contexts. Contribution of Research: Because of the inherent complexity of the coaching process, it is argued that the contextual purpose, particularities, and subjectivities of coaching must be examined before guidelines of recommended practice can be made.

Grounding coaching in its history: the limitations of current coaching politicking

I know what I know. Do I know why I know? That is the question I started with because I wanted to know where the word ‘coach’ and ‘coaching’ originated. If you read the pablum of coaching literature available, some authors try to demonstrate their breadth of understanding by referring to where the word first appeared most likely via a quick google search and voila! Connecting how a coach relates to coaching, that is not the remit of their book. They quickly move onto something that is more important, the real reason you bought their book – how to do coaching!

Stout-Rostron, S. (2011). How does coaching positively impact organisational and societal change? In Biswas-Diener, R. (ed.), Positive Psychology as Social Change (pp. 237–266). Dordrecht: Springer

How does coaching positively impact organisational and societal change?, 2011

This research study incorporates stories and self-reflexive inquiry from a small sample of leading coach practitioners, consultants and executive leaders working with coaching in their organizations. I have gathered the following stories with a focus on the challenges in organizational and institutional environments, to help us understand if and how coaching has influenced organizational and societal change. Executive coaching practice far outstrips its evidence base of knowledge as coaching continues to grow as an international phenomenon. Organizations today are challenged by the complexity and swiftness of change within business, social and political environments, and leaders are expected to quickly adapt their skills and competence in volatile and often crisis-driven markets and societies (Stout Rostron, 2009:19–22). I have interviewed a range of top leaders and managers who use coaching within their organizations, as well as the coaching consultants, practitioners and researche...

The reproduction of ‘coaching culture’: a Bourdieusian analysis of a formalised coach mentoring programme

Sports Coaching Review, 2019

Despite its positive rhetoric, formalised coach mentoring can be problematic due to the institutional agendas of National Governing Bodies (NGB), with mentoring functioning as a method to reproduce organisational cultures and beliefs. This research attempted to explore this issue in greater depth by critically analysing a formalised coach mentoring programme. Fourteen mentors and four mentees participated in semi-structured interviews to discuss their experiences of a NGB's formalised mentoring programme. Analysed through a Bourdieusian lens, the findings present formalised coach mentoring as a source of cultural reproduction, where mentors embodied a group habitus that reinforced the NGB's dispositions and beliefs towards coaching practice. Mentors strived to inculcate mentees and rework their habituses to align with the field's doxa through a process of pedagogic action, with symbolic capital proving influential in reproducing coaching ideologies. NGBs should begin to critically analyse their coach mentoring provision to maximise opportunities for mentee learning and development.

Can’t do it! When Coaches’ Worldviews Challenge Their Interventions

A positive if not positivist discourse in coaching tends to portray the coaching intervention as value-free, thus overlooking the intrinsic complexity of the practice. Indeed, coaches tend to depart from their ideal position as neutral third party when their values are challenged, making it difficult to remain in the contract boundaries. Thus the proposed research focuses on the intersection of worldviews and coaching practice through the angle of ethical dilemmas - what kinds of ethical dilemmas professional coaches in the United States face as a result of their worldviews, and how they resolve them. Using an exploratory case study design with two rounds of data collected from coaches via an open-ended questionnaire and follow-up semi-structured interviews with selected participants, we seek to identify the nature of ethical dilemmas stemming from coaches’ worldviews, approaches that coaches use to resolve them and the supports they drawn upon.

UNDERSTANDING SPORTS COACHING: THE SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COACHING PRACTICE

Successful sports coaching is as dependent on utilizing good teaching and social practices as it is about expertise in sport skills and tactics. Understanding Sports Coaching offers an innovative introduction to the theory and practice of sports coaching, highlighting the social, cultural and pedagogical concepts underpinning good coaching practice. Now in a fully revised and updated new edition, the book explores the complex interplay between coach, athlete, coaching programme and social context, and encourages coaches to develop an open and reflective approach to their own coaching practice. It addresses key issues such as: s power and the coach-athlete relationship s viewing the athlete as a learner s instructional methods and reflection s how our view of ability informs assessment s coaching philosophy and ethics.

Coaching and ‘Self-repair’: Examining the ‘Artful Practices’ of Coaching Work

Sociological Research Online, 2022

The significance of this paper lies in examining how sports coaches construct and negotiate their professional sense making; what Goffman (1971) described as the practices engaged in to manage 'ugly' interpretations. Using the work of Garfinkel (1967) and Goffman (1971), the article pays attention to coaches' 'ethno-methods'; that is, the background knowledge and practical competency employed in forming and maintaining social order. In doing so, the explanatory accounts of Christian (an author who supported the co-construction of this work), a coach, collected via recorded interviews over the course of a 3-month period during a competitive season are used to explore and analyse the procedures used to 'achieve coherence' in what he did. The analysis employed Garfinkel's (1967) description of 'artful practices' and related concepts of 'self repair' to demonstrate the fundamental interactional 'work' done by Christian, not only to understand why he did what he did, but also how he would 'get things done' in future. Such analysis highlights the mundane routines of coaching in particular, and work settings in general, to reveal the backstage manufacturing individuals 'do' to maintain a sense of 'practical objectivity' to their continual inferences, judgements and justifications of practice.

Coaching- a crucible for change.doc

Coaching Education and Training falls broadly into three disciplines: psychology management and adult education. Which discipline the starting point is matters less in my opinion than a “theory to practice approach”. This paper positions coaching in organisations as an adult learning activity (rather than a ‘therapeutic’ or managerial one), that it includes the whole person-in-the-world (we don’t leave ourselves at the door when we go to work), a strength-based orientation rather than a problem orientation and embedding in a systemic framework of interdependence (or “spirituality”). These assumptions create three arenas for coaching learning: 1. The systemic landscape: a systemic model to include the coach/coachee/organisation interface shapes structure of the coaching conversation. The context of the learning is as important as the individual who learns. 2. A crucible: the heart of coaching and coaching learning is relational. With the presence of psychological safety (trust) a coach can encourage exuberant learning by using subtle microskills to shape a relationship of creative tension. 3. A toolbox: a variety of skills and tools that help broaden and deepen the learning.