Framing and Counterframing of the Middle East Peace Process in the Arab -Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The Jerusalem Post (original) (raw)
Related papers
Representations of Peace in News Discourse: Viewpoint and Opportunity for Peace Journalism
Conflict & Communication Online, 2007
This study presents a news discourse analysis of a case in which the dominant political and ideological discourse of conflict and violence gave way to optimism and hopes for peace in Israel. It offers a profile of three types of discourse used by Israeli print news media in the context of 'peace' and 'war' in the immediate aftermath of the Oslo Accords signed on September 13, 1993. By this time, the Israeli media had already demonstrated a dramatic change in attitude and terminology: The familiar war discourse was rapidly being replaced by peace representations and peace images. The assumption of the study is that overuse of the term 'peace' at a time of revolutionary change in Israeli socio-political practice not only detracted from Israeli peace perspectives and beliefs, but also caused news discourses to deteriorate into war discourses. The purpose of the study was to uncover the role of the contextual system developed to communicate specific topics relati...
Discourse in a Confrontational Situation: The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
Language, Discourse & Society, 2018
The aim of the article is to shed light on ongoing situation about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the lenses of newspaper heading analysis. Newspapers manipulate newspapers heading to persuade and influence public opinion so that political actions may be carried out. Unfortunately, such manipulation can lead to drastic consequences such as violent solutions. Through discourse analysis this study compares and contrasts different newspapers and magazines headlines of the Palestinian Israeli conflict. The researcher has used these newspapers and magazines to show attitudinal differences as reflected in discourses of the newspapers. The researcher collected his data from newspapers and magazines through the Internet. The newspapers and the magazines belong to two communities, each of which has its point of view regarding the conflict. Four major key concepts have emerged in the data: OCCUPATION, TERRORISM, SETTLEMENTS, and PEACE PROCESS. Through talking about these concepts and events, analysis of news headlines, grammatical and lexical metaphor, euphemism, stereotypes, and other rhetoric and linguistic devices are used to achieve intentions.
Constructing Peace with Media: The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in Global News Trends
myjurnal.my
We juxtaposed war and peace journalism, based on Galtung's classification, to examine how leading providers of international news-the BBC World, CNN International, Al-Jazeera English and Press TV are responding to the call for a shift from war to peace agenda in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We coded for occurrences, approaches and language-use to determine the salient indicators of war and peace journalism. Overall, our finding shows a significant support for Galtung's description of war journalism compared to peace journalism. We concluded that peace journalism in global news coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at present is more engendered by events of the peace process and we-arepeace-loving propaganda than conscious editorial drive towards peace. The notable presence of indicators of peace journalism offers a reason to believe that media are able to shape peace in Israel/Palestine through a more conscious application of peace journalism model, but also calls for concern on how bias might be represented in peace journalism.
This article presents a general framework for deconstructing and classifying conflict news narratives. This framework, based on a nuanced and contextual approach to analyzing media representations of conflict actors and events, addresses some of the weaknesses of existing classification schemes, focusing in particular on the dualistic approach of the peace journalism model. Using quantitative content analysis, the proposed framework is then applied to the journalistic coverage in the Israeli media of three Middle-Eastern conflicts: the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the conflict surrounding Iran's nuclear program, and the Syrian civil war. The coverage is examined in three leading news outlets – Haaretz, Israel Hayom, and Ynet – over a six-month period. Based on hierarchical cluster analysis, the article identifies four characteristic types of narratives in the examined coverage. These include two journalistic narratives of violence: one inward-looking, ethnocentric narrative, and one outward-looking narrative focusing on outgroup actors and victims; and two political-diplomatic narratives: one interactional, and one outward-looking. In addition to highlighting different constellations of points of view and conflict measures in news stories, the identified clusters also challenge several assumptions underlying existing models, such as the postulated alignment between elite/official actors and violence frames.
Arab News and Conflict A multidisciplinary discourse study
Moulding the Arab-Israeli conflict in a news report or commentary is a sensitive issue to many governments, organizations and individuals in this world. Many feel involved in the Arab-Israeli conflict, for a variety of powerful reasons. These can be related to ideological, religious, or cultural affiliations. They can also be related to strategic, political or commercial interests in the Middle East.
Conflicting Truths in Academic and Journalistic Writing, 2020
Journalism plays a vital political role in public matters by building, amplifying, and framing various problems (D’Angelo et al. 2013: 103). Framing refers to selecting a certain side of a topic and making it primary by influencing the audience through the activation of their schema networks. This contribution compares framing devices used in American, Arab-speaking, Israeli and Palestinian online reports on the Israel-Palestine conflict. My comparative analysis is based on the analysis of a small corpus of 22 online reports (18.461 words) divided into subcorpora including American journals (CNN, New York Times), Arab-speaking networks (AlJazeera, AlArabiya), Israeli journals (Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel) and a Palestinian journal (Palestine Chronicle). The main conflict issues covered are attack(ed) tunnels at the Palestine and Israel border, the Palestinian protest “Great March of Return”, strikes from both sides and the separation wall between Palestine and Israel. While there is “a vast body of literature on ‘western’ coverage [also implying the USA] of the Israel–Palestine conflict” (Elmasry et al. 2013: 753), the ones by Israel, Palestine and general Arabspeaking networks remain largely underexplored. That is why it is necessary to explore specific framing devices revealing possible contrastive perspectives and biases in the four selected contexts. The results of the qualitative analysis indicate that Israel and Palestine present totally contrastive perspectives in the usage of lexical choices (terror vs. resistance Hamas movement), hedging other’s sources (allegedly used by Israel…) and boosting own sources (urging), including more sources supporting own perspectives, personal descriptions of own citizens, pictures (each one presenting own casualties and other’s attacks) etc. While the Israeli perspective was often supported by the American journals (mostly CNN, only partly New York Times), the Palestinian perspective was obviously supported by the Arab speaking networks (mostly AlJazeera, partly AlArabiya). Keywords: media framing, online journals, lexical choice, Israel, Palestine, US
Discourse in Israel During the Death of the Peace Process
This study looks into the ways that the Israeli media and academia portray both the Palestinians and the peace process in the post-Oslo years, with a view to ascertaining the prevalent Israeli attitudes towards the Palestinians, taking the years from 2000 through 2005 as a sample. These years are important in assessing the political zeitgeist as they mark the closing era of the Oslo peace process, punctuated by the Camp David talks and the second Palestinian intifada. The research aims to look at how Israeli narratives regarding their neighbours are an expression of certain trends within Israeli society, coupled with the reporting of political developments. It is primarily looking at how the citizens of Israel see both the Palestinians and the nature of the Israel-Palestine conflict, and as such the study does not delve into the narratives that come from other Western pro-Israeli commentators or from the Jewish Diaspora. The focus on a nation, and more specifically certain voices within that nation, is in order to investigate the narratives that dominate within the society and conflict in question. 2
Lensa, 2022
This study aims to analyse how Palestinian-Israeli conflicts are reported by two different news media, in this case Fox News (American) and Detik.Com (Indonesian). The data in this study were words and sentences which represent how Palestinian-Israeli conflict is reported by the two media. The data were taken from 4 news articles of Fox News and Detik.com which were reported from May 15 to May 31, 2021. The data were collected by using participant non-observation method with note-taking techniques. Then, the data were analyzed based on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) theory proposed by Fairclough (1995). The results of the research indicate that there are differences in the representation of Palestinian and Israeli conflicts in the two media. In Fox News articles, Palestine, especially Hamas, is represented as a terrorist and there is an element of the American government's alignment with Israel. Meanwhile, in Detik.com articles, Israel is represented as the perpetrator of the attack while Palestine is represented as the victim.