Neoliberalismo, biopolítica y gobernanza del crimen transnacional (original) (raw)
Related papers
Neoliberalism, Biopolitics, and the Governance of Transnational Crime
Colombia Internacional, 2012
The paper argues that policies for controlling transnational crime are a crucial dimension for understanding neoliberal hegemony in global governance. It takes on the relation established by Foucault between biopolitics and neoliberalism, in order to reconstruct the discursive formation framing law enforcement and security strategies beyond the spatiality of the nation-state. The paper then turns to outlining the practical expressions of this discourse in the governance techniques deployed to control transnational crime. Overall, this study aims to show how neoliberal criticism of state power is not coupled with a reduction in governance but, on the contrary, implies many regulations and strategies for controlling the population.
2012
The article aims to understand how the dominant conceptualization of transnational crime legitimates non-traditional forms of warfare at the global level while itself constituting the idea of global civil society. It is argued that since this discourse defines transnational crime as a threat to global society, it makes politically viable the deployment of policing and military interventions in defence of the world population. In order to expose this, this article reconstructs the trajectories of the discourse on organized criminality. The article first analyses the emergence of the discourse in the United States during the 1950s, afterwards analysing it as an issue of transnational scope during the last two decades. Thus the aim here is to underline the importance that a phenomenon such as crime has had on the governance at a global level.
Foucault: Critical Theory of the Police in a Neoliberal Age
Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 2014
Abstract: In Discipline and Punish the police is a state institution isomorphic with the prison. In his Collège de France lectures, Foucault unearths a ‘secret history of the police’ where greater attention is paid to public health, social welfare and regulating the marketplace than investigating and arresting criminals. This broad overview of Foucault’s writings on the police exhibits a ‘splintering-effect’ in his modalities of power. To resolve this apparent contradiction, a nominalist reading that conflates Foucault’s divergent paradigms of power results in a more multifaceted history and a ubiquitous mode of power with diverse and precise techniques. There are strengths and weaknesses in Foucault’s theory when applied to modern neoliberal police. Foucault should not be employed for one-dimensional criticisms of modern police or as an analytical cure-all. Keywords: biopower, discipline, Foucault, governmentality, neoliberalism, police
Governing Through Globalised Crime
Governing Through Globalised Crime, 2008
The new globalisation-modernity to risk societies 1 Introduction 1 Imagining globalisation 4 Globalisation dynamics 6 Terror triggers 7 War discourse and citizenship 9 Achieving the international through new globalisation 10 The hegemonic project 11 Neo-liberalism 14 New globalisation and domestic states 16 Globalising crime concerns 20 Globalisation and world systems theory 21 The myth of a borderless world? 24 Globalisation or Westernisation? 25 Individuals and communities 26 Unbundling the relationship between sovereignty, territoriality and political power 27 Globalised values and governance? 29 New globalisation? 33 Conclusion 37 Governing through Globalised Crime Risk from risk 42 Prediction 44 The conditionality and contextualisation of risk 46 The risk of terror 47 Risk management through criminal justice 49 The crime/globalisation nexus 51 Conclusion 53 3 A review of global crime problems-studies of crime as global risk 55 Introduction 55 Imagining risk 56 Governance under challenge 57 Corruption-weak states or good business? 59 Corruption/modernisation nexus 62 Enterprise theory and a market model for corruption regulation 63 Common characteristics of organised crime 67 Organised crime as the banker for terrorism 71 Organised crime as terrorism 73 Representations of organised crime threat 74 Terrorism and the challenge to the state 77 Globalisation and terrorism 78 The local and the global-terrorism as an organised crime threat: the Australian context 79 Conventional representations of organised crimelessons for the interpretation of terrorism 80 Social situations of organised crime/terrorismdomestic and beyond 81 Conclusion 84
The Neoliberal State: Then and Now
Scott, D. and Sim, J. (eds.) Demystifying Power, Crime and Social Harm. London: Palgrave (In Press)., 2024
This chapter explores Steven Box’s contribution to our understanding of the neoliberal state, both when Power, Crime and Mystification (1983) was published, and today. After situating the book in political context and establishing a working, if orthodox, definition of neoliberalism, we go on to unpack the text’s eponymous subject matter – power, crime, and mystification – as each relates to the neoliberal state. Having given Box a fair reading and highlighted a number of key contributions he makes, we argue that his concept of mystification provides an underdeveloped account of power, whether applying it to ‘crime’ and social harm then, or now. If Box’s ‘mystification’ does not adequately account for power, then we might similarly conclude that his text fails to accurately theorise the state as an underlying relation determining a range of possibilities for social action rather than directly setting them on course. However, an important caveat we conclude with is the disciplinary environment in which Box was working. Set against orthodox, administrative, or mainstream accounts of crime and criminology, Power, Crime and Mystification kept alive a radical agenda, rendering the state and its agents legitimate and intelligible as critical criminological research objects. In sum, Box’s contribution to our understanding of the neoliberal state can, and should, be read two ways: as an intellectual project with strengths and flaws, and as a political project with a practical and enduring legacy for as long as his concerns are echoed by contemporary scholars, activists, teachers, and students.