In Pursuit of Paradigm: A Theory of Restorative Justice (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sociology Compass, 2008
The current article explores the growing restorative justice movement. It examines promising research indicating that face-to-face dialogue with crime victims and offenders may work to restore and heal participants, and reduce recidivism. In addition, the article assesses the current state of restorative justice theory, suggesting new avenues for future theory and research. I show how current thinking about restorative justice can benefit from a micro-sociological reframing, focusing on the production of collective emotion and micro-dynamics of interaction.
From Punishment to Healing: The Transformative Power of Restorative Justice
SASI, 2023
Introduction: Conventional criminal justice systems are often dominated by punitive approaches, which focus more on punishing offenders as a form of revenge and their separation from society. However, this approach has drawbacks in achieving broader goals, such as victim recovery, reducing recidivism rates, and building safer communities. Purposes of the Research: This study discusses the power of restorative justice transformation in changing the paradigm from punishment to healing. Restorative justice offers an alternative approach to responsibility, reconciliation, and healing. Methods of the Research: Literature research methods are used to understand restorative justice, including its concepts, practices, impacts, challenges, and benefits. Literature Data is systematically identified, collated, and analyzed. Results of the Research: Restorative justice is a powerful approach to changing judicial paradigms, with its principles emphasizing reconciliation, responsibility, and participation. The impact of restorative justice on perpetrators includes behavior change and responsibility, while on victims, it includes recovery and reconciliation. Implementing restorative justice requires collaboration, adequate resources, and active participation from stakeholders. Restorative justice has the potential to create a more humane, equitable, and sustainable justice system, as well as bring recovery and reconciliation to individuals and communities affected by crime.
Building Community through Restorative Justice
There is considerable dis-ease around our political landscape in the United States at this time. The emotions and rhetoric around clashing political ideologies is stirring a great deal of energy in the public sector no matter what perspective you come from. Many actors in the fields of justice and peacebuilding are asking, what should we do? My response is simple, but not easywe must continue to do what we have always done with more urgency and relevance than ever before. We must nurture good relationships, strengthen community, and build responsive organizational structures that bolster social justice for the common good no matter who inhabits the White House.
the fundamentals of restorative justice
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is conceived of in this essay as a process in which all the stakeholders affected by an injustice have the opportunity to discuss the consequences of the injustice and what might be done to put them right. This is a process conception of restorative justice by which what is to be restored is left open. Rather, the form of restoration of victims, of offenders and of communities that count are those found to be important in such a restorative justice process. Beyond the process conception, there is also a values conception of restorative justice. The key value is that because injustice hurts, justice should heal. Responding to pain with 'another spoonful of pain' 1 is seen as a less satisfactory response than responding with healing or repair. A reason is that hurt tends to beget hurt, creating a vicious spiral of retribution and feuding. Alternatively, it is possible to flip this dynamic into one of healing begetting healing — a virtuous circle. I have argued that the key value of restorative justice is non-domination. 2 The active part of this value is empowerment. Empowerment means preventing the state from 'stealing conflicts' 3 from people who want to hang on to those conflicts and learn from working them through in their own way. Empowerment should trump other restorative justice values like forgiveness, healing and apology, important as they are. This means that if stakeholders in
Revisiting the Real Story of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System: 20 Years On
Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2023
The rapid growth of restorative justice (RJ) has brought myths into the literature. Daly (2002) is among the most important demythologization attempt in the literature. This paper revisits the four myths that were discussed in this seminal paper: (1) RJ is an oppositional concept to retributive justice; (2) RJ is rooted in Indigenous justice and the past dominant form of justice; (3) RJ is a care response as opposed to a justice response; and (4) RJ has the potential to transform people. This paper first examines whether these four myths remain pervasive in the post-2002 RJ literature. Reviewing the post-2002 literature suggests that demythologization has almost taken place. This paper then seeks to highlight theoretical gaps in the post-2002 RJ. Corresponding to the four myths identified, this paper offers four areas of RJ that warrant further debate and research. These are (1) institutionalization of RJ, (2) decolonization of RJ, (3) role of masculinity in RJ, and (4) mechanisms of how RJ works.