A Case Study in Arabic Doxography: Šahrastānī's Account of Pythagoras and its Ismāʿīlī Background (original) (raw)
2022, A. Lammer and M. Jas (eds.) Received Opinions: Doxography in Antiquity and the Islamic World
The Arabic scholarly tradition produced several doxographies and gnomologies of Ancient Greek thought in Arabic language. In this paper, I will focus on al-Šahrastānī's (d. 548/1153), al-Milal wa-lniḥal (Religions and Sects). Despite the popularity of the work and the scholarly attention it attracted, the final evaluation of Šahrastānī's doxography in terms of its method and sources still remains a desideratum. I will avoid the generalizations inherent in the previous characterizations of the work. Instead, I will focus on the chapter on Pythagoras, carefully reading it sentence by sentence, attentively considering the philosophical import of each passage alongside its potential sources as well as the traces of (and reasons for) Šahrastānī's reworking them. I will argue that Šahrastānī provides a systematic reconstruction of Pythagorean philosophy on the basis of the quotations and paraphrases from previous doxographies and of what he considers as contemporary Pythagoreanism (i.e. Ismāʿīlīsm). Religions and Sects will reveal itself both as a source for the Greek philosophical tradition and as a source of information on the Arabic philosophical tradition as such.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Cultures in motion. Studies in the medieval and early modern periods, 2014
In this chapter Anna Izdebska gathers evidence from various medieval Arabic sources which quote, describe or refer to the figure of Pythagoras and to Pythagorean philosophy. She shows how attitudes towards the Pythagorean tradition depended on an author’s sectarian identity within Islam as well as on his dependence on Aristotle (some Arabic intellectuals were heavily influenced by his negative views regarding pre-Socratic philosophy). Whereas a disregard for Pythagoras and his ideas seems to have been shared by most orthodox Sunni philosophers, certain other Arabic thinkers – in particular those considered to be more heterodox – valued Pythagoras for his role as an ancient sage, as the founder of philosophy in general, or as an authority in arcane sciences.
Received Opinions: Doxography in Antiquity and the Islamic World [2022]
Philosophia antiqua: A Series of Studies on Ancient Philosophy 160. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022
This volume – the proceedings of a 2018 conference at LMU Munich funded by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation – brings together, for the rst time, experts on Greek, Syriac, and Arabic traditions of doxography. Fourteen contributions provide new insight into state-of-the-art contemporary research on the widespread phenomenon of doxography. Together, they demonstrate how Greek, Syriac, and Arabic forms of doxography share common features and raise related questions that benefit interdisciplinary exchange among colleagues from various disciplines, such as classics, Arabic studies, and the history of philosophy.
On the transmission of Greek philosophy to medieval Muslim philosophers
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
There are two dominant approaches towards understanding medieval Muslim philosophy: (1) Greek ancestry approach and (2) religiopolitical context approach. In the Greek ancestry approach, medieval Muslim philosophy is interpreted in terms of its relation to classical Greek philosophy, particularly to the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. The religiopolitical context approach, however, views a thorough understanding of the religious and political situation of that time as the key to the proper understanding of medieval Muslim philosophy. Notwithstanding the immense significance of the two approaches for understanding medieval Muslim philosophy, the question on the reason behind medieval Muslim philosophers’ preference for Plato’s Republic over Aristotle’s Politics in political philosophy is not accurately answered. This preference is usually attributed either to the availability or unavailability of the text or to the suitability or unsuitability of the text for Islamic theological v...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.