Bíró, László: SPHERE-OF-INFLUENCE POLITICS ON THE BALKANS IN THE MID-20TH CENTURY IN THE MIRROR OF THE SOVIET–YUGOSLAV RELATIONS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Soviet Policy in the Post-Tito Balkans. Volume 4. Studies in Communist Affairs
1979
European communist party conference in East Berlin in 1976 they played an active role in opposing the Soviets and the other ruling European communist parties. The Balkans are of interest to the Soviet Union for a variety of reasons-not the least important of which is the strategic significance of the area for Soviet military security. Even though the Northern Tier states of East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia are more important to the military security of the Warsaw Pact, the presence of forces hostile to the Soviet Union in either Yugoslavia or Romania would be perceived by the Soviets as a serious threat to their security. In addition, actual Soviet control over Yugoslavia and Albania would provide them with access to naval bases on the Adriatic and a more secure role in the Mediterranean. More important for the Soviets, however, is the possibility of eliminating the political-ideological challenge which the independent Balkan communist states have signified during much of the past quarter century. The future of the Balkans is extremely important, not only for the countries of the area themselves, but also for the future security of both East and West. In the following pages a number of specialists assess some of the various internal and external dangers presented by the succession crisis facing Yugoslavia. The various chapters cover some familiar material, but, more importantly, they also provide fresh insights on the interests, capabilities, and policy options of some of the principal participants in the international community with regard to the post-Tito Balkans.
The Balkan Pact – History and Modernity
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE AIR FORCE, 2017
The paper is aimed at discussing some of the attempts to form alliances in the Balkan space throughout time, without intending to be exhaustive, and considering especially those including Romania. Mention should be made that the systems of alliances existing during the Balkan Wars and the two world wars are not covered in the paper, as they have been extensively discussed in the literature. Confronted with different threats, generated by the geopolitical and geostrategic context as well as by the divergences between them, the peoples in the Balkans have perceived establishing alliances as necessary, either to prevent or to manage the crises in the region. The conclusion is an invitation to reflection whether it is the commonalities or the divides that have troubled the Balkan space for so many years.
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 2019
SAŽETAK: Nakon gotovo tri desetljeća upravljanja "odozgo" ili primjene različitih koncepata i strategija Zapada objedinjenih u mantri europerspektive-Zapadni Balkan je ponovno u fokusu međunarodne javnosti kao novo geopolitičko žarište. Umjesto ciljane europeizacije, svjedočimo daljnoj balkanizaciji regije koja je posljedica neuspješnog djelovanja Europske unije, kao i suprotstavljenih interesa saveznika-SAD-a, NATO-a, Velike Britanije, EU-a i Njemačke. Takva konstelacija odnosa omogućila je jačanje utjecaja niza ne-zapadnih aktera-Rusije, Turske, Kine, Irana i Saudijske Arabije, čija prisutnost već niz godina snažno oblikuje sigurnosno ozračje na Zapadnom Balkanu. Sve je očitije da je angloamerički projekt posthladnoratovskog uređenja prostora bivše Jugoslavije značajno istrošen. Naime, obećani prosperitet i stabilnost regije su izostali, a zaostavština primijenjenih zapadnih politika je krajnje siromaštvo, iznimna nezaposlenost i iseljavanje, propast javnih politika i kontinuirano gospodarsko urušavanje, kao i ponovno "aktiviranje" postojećih kriznih žarišta: Bosne i Hercegovine, Kosova i Makedonije.
Colloquia Humanistica 6 (2017) Te images of the borders of civilization, 2017
The Yugoslav-Bulgarian rapprochement, initiated by King Aleksandar I Karađorđević in the early 1930s, with the idea of including Bulgaria in the planned Balkan Pact, was one of the biggest reorientations in Yugoslav policy at the turn of the 1920s and 1930s. Since the end of the Great War, Yugoslavia's eastern neighbor had been treated rather as one of the greatest threats to the postwar order in the Balkans. This reorientation, resulting primarily from the geopolitical situation in Europe required a propaganda campaign improving the image of Bulgaria in the eyes of Yugoslav society. This would not be possible without the support of the press which, in the first half of the twentieth century, was still the most popular and definitely most accessible medium of disseminating information, and which could significantly affect public opinion in its perception of current political events. The aim of the author was to show the changes in presenting Yugoslav-Bulgarian relations in the daily Politika, the biggest and most widely read newspaper in the interwar Yugoslavia, in the context of the political activities of King Aleksandar I aimed at creating the so-called Balkan Entente.
A Historical Approach on Russian Foreign Policy in the Balkans (1945 -2022)
2023
The purpose of this paper is to analyze, from a historical standpoint, the development of Russian policy in the Balkans from the end of the Second World War to present day. The paper focuses on three major historical periods: the Cold War (1945-1990), the dissolution of the USSR and territorial changes in the Balkans (1990-2000), and lastly the period of 2000-2022, which in political history studies is considered as a comeback of Russia as a prominent player in the region. The methodology employed is based on a comparative analysis of the three periods, with the primary aim being to comprehend the significant difference in Russia's policy on the region of the Balkans over the past 78 years. The paper examines external factors that have influenced Russia's policy shifts in the Balkans, as well as internal factors, particularly Putin's role in remaking Kremlin's foreign policy as a great power, based on contemporary literature. The paper adopts a multidisciplinary approach by alternating both economic and military diplomacy, focusing on critical moments during the three aforementioned periods. In conclusion, this analysis aims to tackle concerns regarding the impact of Russian politics on the future of the Balkans by analyzing the interaction between Balkan states and Russia during the three above eras.
The Balkan has always been an interesting strategic and geopolitical place – once for the Ottoman Empire, today for Western Europe, the United States and Russia. We can come to the conclusion that the Balkans, no matter how economically and socially unstable, in almost all global geopolitical conception, it has an important place. The questions arise-what contributed to such instability in this part of Europe? Are those numerous wars being waged on the Balkan Peninsula? Embargo imposed on almost every Balkan country at some point in history by more powerful and stronger? Ethnic and religious diversity? Or was it perhaps due to political instability? The topic of this paper is a more detailed introduction to the very concept of the Balkans and the Balkan Peninsula, its geographical features, advantages and disadvantages, as well as the economic and social factors in its territory and in its countries. In addition, this paper will also discuss the importance of the Balkan countries for the European integration processes and the globalization itself, as well as their significance for other geopolitical conceptions.
MOMENTS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF BALKAN DIPLOMACY AT THE START OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
Historically, the Balkan Peninsula is marked as an area where the Ottoman Empire made its influence known. The notion of Balkan space is often thought of in a negative way, being associated with the so called "Powder Keg of Europe". At the start of the nineteenth century, the peninsula was divided by the Ottoman and Habsburg empires. One century later, the same lands are divided up by six states. No less than 11 wars and countless armed conflicts were necessary in order to get to this result. For the Europeans that lived at the start of the last century, the Balkans represented a terra incognita, a particular area, slightly explored, constantly avoided, carrying the burden of violence. A territory filled with terror and endless strife, conjuring up unpleasant images: political instability, secret societies, and atrocities. In the present work, I wish to show the manner in which diplomacy tried to play a major role in this region's stability through its fundamental concepts (summits, international conferences, parliamentary diplomacy, the international activities of transnational and subnational entities, the unofficial diplomacy of non-governmental elements, as well as the work put in by numerous international civil employees). Also, I will incline towards the last phase of the balance of power system, more specifically on its ending through the first Balkan war.
Yugoslavia and Its Western Neighbours, 1945-1980
Zeitgeschichte, 5/2014
By analising the relations of Yugoslavia to its Western neighbours during the Cold War, this article provides a comparative study on the developments leading Yugoslavia from deep rooted enmity with Austria and Italy to “peaceful coexistence” in the Cold War and amicable relations across ideological and economic barriers. Major factors for this development are tackled, such as the importance of personal commitment among political leaders; the emergence of superpowers during the Cold War; and the repercussions of internal developments for international relations. Thus, a broad picture is drawn that proves how Yugoslav policies towards its Western neighbours were indeed a particular and intertwined factor of Yugoslav politics.
Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини, 2017
One of the most trustworthy partners of Romania was Yugoslavia. Their common purposes, defensive views, as well as the alliances they were part of, reflect this fact. These states, the forms of which were renewed at the end of The First World War, had always wished for the maintenance of peace and development according to the principles of the Peace Treaties of Paris (1919-1920). The Romanian Yugoslav cooperation in the Little Entente and The Balkan Pact represented the desire of the states in this area to settle down, to stop revisionist states' pretension of reconfiguring the borders. Situated in a restless area, Yugoslavia was compelled to be mindful and on the look out for Fascist Italy's external politics, especially after the occupation of Albania, while Romania found itself a neighbouring country of Nazi Germany after the latter occupied Czechoslovakia. Our endeavour conducts an analysis of the year 1939 through the eyes of diplomats who struggled to stay neutral and maintain their countries' territories unaltered.