An Avenue for Challenging Sexism: Examining the High School Sociology Classroom (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Journal of Social Studies Research, 2019
Gender inequity is a persistent problem in the United States. While the high school social studies classroom should be an important space for addressing gender inequity, there is significant underrepresentation of women in the curriculum. Thus, it is crucial that we understand how self-described feminist social studies teachers present women and gender-equity in their classrooms. In this mixed-methods study, the researchers examined the beliefs and practices of six feminist-identifying teachers. The results reveal commonalities across teachers related to classroom discourses, curricular modifications, and professional practice, yet there were compelling differences based on whether or not the teacher subscribed to a critical feminist perspective or a liberal feminist perspective. While all the teachers in the study saw themselves as change agents, teachers who operated from a critical feminist lens focused more on structural gender inequity as a means to eliminate sexism, whereas teachers who operated from a liberal lens focused more on individual acts of sexism and greater inclusion of women-often individual women-in the curriculum. This study contributes to the scarce research on feminism in social studies and provides tools for practitioners who want practices that are more inclusive.
Learning through Teaching the 'Sociology of Gender'
This paper reflects on the experience of teaching a course on women and society in a sociology department over a period of seven years. This is discussed from different angles—related to sociology and its disciplinary location; questions of women's studies and feminist politics; and the complex dimensions of pedagogy in particular. The diversity amongst students and the
Gendered subjects : the dynamics of feminist teaching
2013
Introduction. Part 1: Frameworks and Definitions 1. The politics of nurturance Margo Culley, Arlyn Diamond, Lee Edwards, Sara Lennox, Catherine Portuges 2. Taking women students seriously Adrienne Rich 3. Classroom pedagogy and the new scholarship on women Frances Maher 4. Women's Studies: a knowledge of one's own Janice G. Raymond 5. The educational process of Women's Studies in Argentina: reflections on theory and technique Gloria Bonder Part 2: Transforming the Disciplines 6. Feminist pedagogy as a subversive activity Robert J. Bezucha 7. Teaching mediation: a feminist perspective on the study of law Janet Rifkin 8. Staging the feminist classroom: a theoretical model Helene Keyssar Part 3: Teaching as Other 9. Pink elephants: confessions of a black feminist in an all-white, mostly male English department of a white university somewhere in God's country Erlene Stetson 10. Is there no room for me in the closet? Or, my life as the only lesbian professor Judith McDani...
Sociology. CUNY Panel: Rethinking the Disciplines. Women in the Curriculum Series
1997
This collection of five essays examines the ways sociology, as a discipline, currently reflects ongoing scholarship on gender, race, ethnicity, social class, and sexual orientation. In "Scholarship and the Curriculum: The Study of Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Class," Margaret L. Anderson argues that the study of race, class, and gender has become a new field within sociology. In "Sociology and Disciplinary Transformation," Rose M. Brewer examines some of the problems in the field, maintaining that there is a growing emphasis on the sociology of gender without consideration of race and that recent changes in the field have not embraced women of color and working-class women. In "Rethinking the Disciplines: Sociology and Criminology," Natalie J. Sokoloff argues that race, gender, and class are largely ignored in the fields of sociology and criminology, while Julia Wrigley, in "Rethinking the Disciplines: Sociology," notes that feminist study of gender potentially challenges both the core theoretical perspectives of the field and its subfield organization. In "Rethinking the Disciplines: Sociology of the Family," Gloria Bonilla-Santiago maintains that feminist, race, and ethnic studies have advanced sociologists' understanding of the family's relationships to the economy and the state. Each essay contains references. (MDM)
"It’s Not Rocket Science!": High School Sociology Teachers’ Conceptions of Sociology
2006
Since academic sociology's birth in this country, sociologists have not been shy about publicly praising and ridiculing the discipline. Though sociologists have been the primary participants in the seemingly endless debates about sociology's proper subject matter, methods, and purpose, there is another group that has also struggled over the past 95 years to formulate a conception of the discipline-high school sociology teachers. At this point, we know virtually nothing about what the thousands of high school teachers who offer sociology each year, actually think about the discipline. This paper uses questionnaire and interview data collected from high school sociology teachers to examine their thoughts on four topics: (1) sociology's strengths, (2) its weaknesses, (3) whether high school students are capable of understanding the discipline, and (4) appropriate course objectives. The results indicate that high school teachers view sociology quite differently from academic sociologists, and that their conceptions are based primarily on "textbook sociology." I conclude by discussing the far-reaching implications of teachers' current thinking about the discipline.
Gendering Social Studies: Teachers' Intended and Enacted Curriculum and Student Diffraction
Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 2020
Due to intransigence of social studies curriculum-makers to broaden the scope of who and what is studied, women (especially non-white women) are lacking representation. However, some teachers go beyond the textbook to select alternative curriculum lenses. Utilizing curricular-instructional gatekeeping, complementary curriculum, and queer theory, this article examines how two secondary teachers who incorporate issues of gender and/or women’s experiences into their social studies curriculum describe their reasoning and intentions, how their expressed aims are manifested within their classrooms, and student reaction to the incorporation of gender and women’s experience in the social studies curriculum. Findings indicate participants value multiple perspectives and parity in social studies curriculum and map these ideas onto the explicit curriculum. However, student responses tend to resist teacher intentions and enactment of challenges to normative gender roles. This diffracted curriculum interferes with teacher aims, creating a curricular space where traditional assumptions of the gender binary play out in teacher-student and student-student interactions. These findings indicate a more relational approach to social studies curriculum may be needed to encourage students to engage constructively with nonnormative social ideas.
A Guide to Teaching Introductory Women's and Gender Studies: Socially Engaged Classrooms
A Guide to Teaching Introductory Women's and Gender Studies: Socially Engaged Classrooms, 2021
This book provides a practical, evidence-based guide to teaching introductory Women's and Gender Studies courses. Based on the findings of a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning project that analyzed 72 Intro students’ written work, the authors equip instructors with key principles that can help them adapt their pedagogy to a range of classroom environments. By putting student learning at the center of course design, the authors invite readers to reflect on their own investments in and goals for the introductory course. The book also draws on the authors’ combined decades of teaching experience, and aims to help instructors anticipate the emotional, intellectual, and interpersonal challenges and rewards of teaching and learning in the introductory WGS course. Chapters focus on course design, including identifying desired learning outcomes (in terms of course content, skills, and dispositions or habits of mind); choosing course materials; pedagogical activities; and assessing stu...
Putting Feminist Pedagogy to the Test
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2000
Critics of women's studies (WS) have charged that WS teaching overemphasizes students' personal experience and is overly politicized. They claim further that WS classes discourage critical, independent thinking and stifle open, participatory learning, causing student dlssatisfaction. This study provides empirical ebidence of the process of WS teaching from the perspective of 111 teachers and 789 of their students from 32 campuses in the United States. Contrary to WS critics, WS faculty and students reported strong emphases on critical thinkindopen-mindedness and participatory learning and relatively weaker emphases on personal experience and political understanding/ activism. In addition, student ratings of positive class impact were higher for WS than non-WS classes. The results support the pedagogic distinctiveness of women's studies.
Previous research identifies the importance of feminist knowledge for improving gender equity, economic prosperity and social justice for all. However, there are difficulties in embedding feminist knowledge in higher education curricula. Across England, undergraduate sociology is a key site for acquiring feminist knowledge. In a study of four English sociology departments Basil Bernstein’s theoretical concepts and Madeleine Arnot’s notion of gender codes frame an analysis indicating that sociology curricula in which feminist knowledge is strongly classified in separate modules is associated with more women being personally transformed. Men’s engagement with feminist knowledge is low and it does not become more transformative when knowledge is strongly classified. Curriculum, pedagogy and gender codes are all possible contributors to these different relationships with feminist knowledge across the sample of 98 students. Key words: gender codes, curriculum, pedagogy, qualitative analysis, academic disciplines.