Martin Luther's theology: its historical and systematic development (original) (raw)
Related papers
Pillar or outcome? Luther's practical theological aim and its theopaschitical implications
An often misunderstood element in Luther’s Theology was the combination of its anti-scholastical, practical aim (“vera theologia est practica”) with its highly theoretical outcome. A reason for it might be found it the increasing role of such outcome, which at a given point seemed to have turned into a proper pillar of his own Theology. An example of this (at least apparent) contradiction is provided by the Christological background of the anti-roman doctrine of the Justification as fröhlicher Wechsel/admirabile commercium, which, due to its particular interpretation of the Doctrine of the so-called communicatio idiomatum, lead to the consistent, and nonetheless rejected formulation of a Doctrine of the Theopaschy. Aim of this paper is to sketch such consistent background, its development in the controversies of the second half of the 16th Century, as well as the attempt to save this peculiar element beside the Christological controversies, deriving it no longer from the Christological Doctrine of communicatio idiomatum, but rather from the one of so-called status exinanitionis et exaltationis, keeping a look on its originally practical aim.
MARTIN LUTHER: HOW HIS RELIGIOUS AND INTELLECTUAL SETTINGS INFLUENCED HIS THEOLOGY
2019
It will be terrible to assume that, Luther just came ‘out of the blue’ and carry the flag of the Reformation course which he effectively delivered. Though few have denied any kind of influence upon him by either the Religious ideas of his time or the Intellectual setting within which he was brought up. However, in this short paper I deem it fit to investigate both the religious and intellectual setting of Luther, to point out how he was indeed influenced by them, and how because of this influence he was able to reconstruct the task of a “true theologian” and what a “true theology” should be (or is).
An Examination and critique of Luthers Ecclessiology
This paper is an examination of Martin Luther’s ecclesiology. Examined precisely will be his understanding of the relationship between the Word and the Church, his interpretation of comunio sanctorum, his concept of the Two Kingdoms and how this concept influences or flows from and through his ecclesiology. Lastly is a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of Luther’s ecclesiological doctrine whilst comparing scholar’s thoughts. In closing I have found that Luther’s ecclesiology is mostly strong, for he appeals to the traditions of the ecumenical councils to prove he is being consistent with their position within the historical Church perspective. Whilst his Church doctrine does have some weaknesses concerning the areas of mission, evangelism, eschatology and the lack of a well thought out Episcopal system, overall Luther’s doctrine of the Church is hard to fault, so far as the core matters of salvation or community are concerned.
Luther and Lutheranism: The P. O. Box Martin Luther
European Scientific Journal, 2013
This article explores the idea that social communication performs coupled with the consciousness of human beings -but it is not generated by it-, and gives the example of the German reformer Martin Luther. An overlap in the operations of consciousness and of communication -interpenetrationis made possible with the person/actor distinction, which actualizes in communication through schemata (the person-schema and the actor-schema), the so called P. O. Box Martin Luther. Luther's positioning in relation to the polemical controversies in which he participated -the Peasants' War (radical Anabaptism), the free will and the sacramental debates-, determined the future course of his Reform, and were decisively oriented by the person-schema. The person/actor schemata also allow the distinction between Luther the person and Lutheranism the doctrine.