Abstracts from the NIHR INVOLVE Conference 2017 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2013
It is good practice for the public to be involved in developing health research. Resources should be available for researchers to fund the involvement of the public in the development of their grants. To describe a funding award scheme to support public involvement in grant development, managed by an NIHR Research Design Service (RDS). Case examples of how the award contributed to successful grant applications and findings from a recent evaluation of the scheme are presented. A case study of resource provision to support public involvement activities in one region of England. University and NHS-based researchers, and members of the public. Between 2009 and 2012, the RDS approved 45 public involvement funding awards (totalling nearly £19 000). These awards contributed to 27 submitted applications at the time of writing, of which 11 were successful (totalling over £7.5 million). The evaluation revealed difficulties encountered by some researchers when involving the public in grant dev...
NIHR CLAHRC for South Yorkshire Internal Evaluation Report November 2011: Executive Summary
This document summarises an interim report of evaluation findings for the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for South Yorkshire (CLAHRC SY), which was completed in November 2011. This evaluation work encompasses the following topics: 1.Changing landscape 2.Participation, involvement and engagement 3.Public and patient involvement 4.Priority setting 5.Addressing inequalities 6.Capacity building 7.Governance and programme processes 8.Funding and value 9.Outcomes and impact
Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study
BMJ Open, 2022
ObjectivesThe UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) training programmes were created to build and sustain research capacity in healthcare. Following the training programme 10-year strategic review, this qualitative study aimed to deepen understanding of facilitators and barriers for those progressing through NIHR-supported research careers.DesignSemistructured qualitative study.Data collection and analysisTelephone interviews conducted between May and August 2017 were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using Framework Approach.SettingUK National Health Service (NHS) Trusts, university medical schools, District General Hospitals, Integrated Academic Training Programme centres and Research Design Services across the North East, North West, South East and South West of England, London and the Midlands.ParticipantsFourteen women and eight men, of whom, 14 were previous or current NIHR personal awardees (seven doctors and seven allied health professionals (AHPs) or n...
Background and Rationale: Internationally, the idea of "co-production' has become more popular in health research because of the promise of partnership between researchers and patients to create research that focuses on patients' needs. Patient and public involvement (PPI) at an early stage in deciding what research should be funded, can improve the quality and impact of research. However, professional power over the process places limits on the public practising their participatory rights for involvement in commissioning research that affects them and can leave members of the public feeling unheard or excluded, particularly within the context of early phase applied health research.