Entrepreneurship as social interaction (original) (raw)
Related papers
Entrepreneurship research in practice: Methodological issues1
2000
This paper presents and discusses the methodology applied in the LOK Project 3.1 called Social Networks and Entrepreneurship (SNE), which focuses on the development process of high-tech and knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial ventures in Denmark. The project uses a complex research methodology and design applying both quantitative and qualitative research methods in a longitudinal perspective. The quantitative part of the investigation uses
One step beyond? Towardsaprocess view of social networks in entrepreneurship
Acritical challenge for entrepreneurship scholars is the need to develop agreater understanding of (1) how, when and why entrepreneurial networks emerge, develop and change over time and (2) how network evolution impacts on the entrepreneurial trajectory. This special issue of Entrepreneurship &Regional Development begins to address these challenges by presenting arange of current works that further increase our understanding about social network dynamics during the entrepreneurial process. We begin by connecting this special issue to some of the main challenges of the field of entrepreneurship. From this, we propose an integrative perspective required to move thinking forward. We then summarize how the diverse papers presented in this special issue contribute to opening up the research field further and help us develop agreater understanding about the challenges entrepreneurship scholars face. We conclude this article with lessons and suggestions for future research.
Entrepreneurship research in practice: Methodological issues
This paper presents and discusses the methodology applied in the LOK Project 3.1 called Social Networks and Entrepreneurship (SNE), which focuses on the development process of high-tech and knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial ventures in Denmark. The project uses a complex research methodology and design applying both quantitative and qualitative research methods in a longitudinal perspective. The quantitative part of the investigation uses a web-based questionnaire, while the qualitative part consists of in-depth, face-to-face interviews.
Procedia Computer Science, 2013
This paper discusses a statistical analysis emerging in the field entrepreneurship education, as a result of a survey conducted in the frame of the European Project NETT (Networked Entrepreneurship Training of Teachers, http://nett-project.eu).
Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization, 2002
Economists have long focused on markets as exchange mechanisms, and many economic sociologists have also used the same approach. This focus emphasized the importance of price and that of the social embeddedness of economic transactions among actors, whether individuals or organizations. Focusing on the production side of economic activity, however, underlines the fact that society is a society of organizations (Presthus, 1962; White, 1981b; Stokman et al., 1985; Coleman, 1990; Perrow, 1991), with specific social mechanisms underlying collective action. From the latterÕs perspective, saying that society is an organizational society is also equivalent to saying that its intrinsically multi-level dimension should frame Ð much more than it currently does Ð soci-ologistsÕ perspective on human, including economic, activity. In our view, this additional focus reframes analyses of both market exchange and social exchange (Blau, 1964) of resources as they are connected in production. This approach advocates new combinations of theories of individual action and theories of collective action. Within such a perspective, priority is given here to the study of social exchange and cooperation among interdependent entrepreneurs, at the intraorganizational and interorganizational levels. In short, this study is about the social discipline that helps interdependent entrepreneurs in their collective action. Entrepreneurs are not conceived as individuals acting on their own, but as individuals, and organizations, interacting with, and investing in, other entrepreneurs as peers or quasi-peers in order to make collective action possible. The sociology of organizations has been able to design an ideal-typical View publication stats View publication stats
Entrepreneurship as connecting: some implications for theorising and practice
2012
Purpose–The purpose of this paper is to consider why entrepreneurship theorising has become fragmented and how the research problem might be resolved. Design/methodology/approach–The authors first examine how entrepreneurial constructs reflect only part of what we “mean” by the construct to argue that we use different social constructions. This explains why theories are fragmented. But the authors then ask how we might use and reconcile this diversity, pointing to the utility of the constructs as part of a complex whole.
The social dimensions of entrepreneurship
Technovation, 2005
Schumpeter's canonical depiction of the entrepreneur as an agent of social and economic change implies that entrepreneurs are especially sensitive to the social envir onment. We extract teachings from several disciplines while adopting a primary perspective based on institutional economics to consider the social dimensions of entrepreneurship. The level and modes of entrepreneurial activity are affected by the surrounding culture and by legal rules. Entrepreneurs may partially overcome institutional deficiencies by relying on social networks that facilitate reputational bonding as a means for resource-sharing.
Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence
The study sheds light on “entrepreneurial ecosystem” which refers to the processing of resources, knowledge and talent in businesses for organisational growth. Business organisations focus on implementing strategies in “entrepreneurial ecosystem” that is not only good for organisational growth but also contributes to social and environmental development. “Social entrepreneurship” and “social innovation” are evaluated as the key elements of “entrepreneurial ecosystem” that is beneficial for social developments. Evaluating the roles of “social entrepreneurship” and “social innovation” in the “entrepreneurial ecosystem” is the main purpose of this study. In regard to this, primary sources have been used for gathering relevant, genuine and numerical data. A survey has been conducted with a total of 10 questions (including demographic) among a total of 51 respondents. There were a few criteria maintained for gathering relevant data such as only the managers of start-up companies were all...