Constitution as Social Contract in Contemporary Ethiopia: The Need to Re-construct Political Arrangements (original) (raw)
Related papers
Between Failure and Redemption - The Future of the Ethiopian Social Contract
2022
The contemporary Ethiopian state is, without question, facing enormous challenges, including the militarization of state and non-state actors, high population density accompanied by youth unemployment, food insecurity, real and perceived inequality and discrimination among ethnic groups, ethnic and political polarization and widespread human rights abuses. At the core of the issues faced by Ethiopia lies the state-building process by which major constituencies and elite groups were either alienated !om, or coopted into, ruling structures. Unable to derive political legitimacy !om democratic participation, successive governments largely relied on coercion and neopatrimonialism, modulated by constitutional narratives and reform efforts including those of the imperial regime’s attempts to regulate government functions by a written constitution, the Derg’s land law reforms and the abolition of the gabar system, and the EPRDF’s recognition and promotion of linguistic and cultural rights. Despite initially promising political, legal, and institutional reform initiatives undertaken by the incumbent regime, Ethiopians remain divided in their views about what kind of constitutional structure has the greatest potential to unify the country without compromising diversity.
Toward Making a Proper Space for the Individual in the Ethiopian Constitution
A symbolic, normative, and institutional investigation of the 1995 Ethiopian Constitution reveals that the individual is displaced and locked in the periphery as much of the socio-economic and political ecology of the state is occupied by Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (NNPs). The Constitution presents and makes NNPs authors, sovereigns and constitutional adjudicators by adopting a corporate conception of group rights. As this corporate conception of group rights permeate and structure the organization of the Ethiopian state and government, the individual is relegated in the constitutional order. In order to make the transition to constitutional democracy sustainable, it is argued that the Constitution should accommodate and ensure individual autonomy by adopting a collective conception of group rights. This offers both the normative basis and institutional safeguards to strike a proper equilibrium between group rights and individual rights.
THE QUEST FOR ETERNAL CLAUSES IN THE ETHIOPIAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND DEMOCRATIC REFORMS
Oromia Law Journal, 2021
For continuity of states, some constitutions have eternal clauses, which are immune from amendments forever. However, the concept of eternity has never been recognized in any of Ethiopian constitutions despite long history of constitution-making processes. Ethiopians have been tackling to establish a viable, constitutional, and democratic government through making and remaking many constitutions in their political history. Among the constitutional reforms in Ethiopia are the 1931 and 1955 Monarchical Constitutions, the 1987 Socialist Oriented Constitution and the 1995 Federal Oriented Constitution. The chief challenge in the Ethiopian constitutional and democratic reforms is that the previous reforms have never been utilized as steppingstones for the new reforms. To this date, Ethiopians have neither developed their common constitutional culture nor recognized the eternal clauses on important political and constitutional matters. There is no consensus on the issue of national identity, state structure, the form of government, language policy, regional state formation and others. Currently, Ethiopia has also been facing multiple challenges, including ethnic tensions, sporadic border conflicts, massive internal displacement, drought, poverty, and gross human rights violations. For this reason, this Article argues that Ethiopia must introduce 'eternal constitutional clauses' on issues of common national interests.
Constitution, constitutionalism and foundation of democracy in Ethiopia
This paper tries to explain constitution, constitutionalism and foundation of democracy in Ethiopia. To this end, the main purpose of this paper is to explain the new democratic constitutional process in Ethiopia. The paper has three parts. Part one is largely dealt about the constitution and constitutional development in Ethiopia. It deals with the ancient and medieval traditional unwritten constitution of Ethiopia, namely Kibre Negest, Feteha Negest and Serate Mengist; and the modern written constitution of Ethiopia since 1931 to the present FDRE constitution. The second part of this paper deals with constitutionalism; mainly a comparison of past (monarchical constitution i.e. 1931 constitution, 1955 revised constitution, and the 1987 PDRE constitution) and present i.e. the 1995 FDRE constitution. The third part deals with democracy in Ethiopia.
The Ethiopian Second Republic and the Fragile “Social Contract”
Africa Spectrum
Eighteen years after the change of power and the ushering in of the second Ethiopian republic in 1991, the political process in Ethiopia has, according to most observers, rigidified and largely closed the space for representative democracy. This paper will look at the main organizing political ideas or ideology of the current Ethiopian republic and to the nature of its governance techniques in the face of domestic and international challenges with reference to the debate on “failing” or “fragile” states. The new “social contract” defined after 1991 and codified in the 1994 Constitution is precarious. Dissent and ethno-regional resistance to federal policies are dealt with mainly by coercion and discursive isolation. Oppositional forces voice the need for a rethinking of the organizing ideas and institutions of the second republic in order to enhance political consensus and a shared political arena, but get little response. The paper will sketch an interpretation of governance in Eth...
An Outline for the Study of Ethiopian Constitutional Law
International Journal of Legal Information, 2015
This outline is prepared based on the 1995 Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (“The 1995 Constitution”). It is important to acknowledge at the outset that the 1995 Constitution cannot be studied in isolation. Like its forerunners, it is not distinctively Ethiopian, save for the customary and religious laws that it recognized. Ethiopian constitutions, both past and present, have been derived, in part, from foreign constitutions including constitutions from western and eastern countries, including Japan. Although its immediate sources can be traced back to the Charter of the Transitional Government of 1991, this 1995 Constitution was built upon the constitutions that preceded it, the laws that have been promulgated since the 1930s, and the religious and customary laws that predated it.
Preamble We, the Nations, Nationalities and Peoples of Ethiopia: Strongly committed, in full and free exercise of our right to self-determination, to building a political community founded on the rule of law and capable of ensuring a lasting peace, guaranteeing a democratic order, and advancing our economic and social development. Firmly convinced that the fulfillment of this objective requires full respect of individual and people's fundamental freedoms and rights, to live together on the basis of equality and without any sexual, religious or cultural discrimination; Further convinced that by continuing to live with our rich and proud cultural legacies in territories we have long inhabited, have, through continuous interaction on various levels and forms of life, built up common interest and have also contributed to the emergence of a common outlook; Fully cognizant that our common destiny can best be served by rectifying historically unjust relationships and by further promoting our shared interests; Convinced that to live as one economic community is necessary in order to create sustainable and mutually supportive conditions for ensuring respect for our rights and freedoms and for the collective promotion of our interests; Determined to consolidate, as a lasting legacy, the peace and the prospect of a democratic order, which our struggles and sacrifices have brought about; Have therefore adopted, on 8 th December 1994 this constitution through representatives we have duly elected for this purpose as an instrument that binds us in a mutual commitment to fulfill the objectives and the principles set forth above.