The Interpreting Ability on Science Kinematics Graphs of Senior High School Students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Preliminary Study: Profile of Students’ Interpretation Skills on the Topic of Kinematics
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
A graph is a type of representation that is useful in summarizing data, and processing and interpreting new information from complex data. One of the reasons why it is important to understand graphical representation is because graphs can provide quantitative information that is easy to understand. Kinematics is the science of dealing with the movement of an object. Learning can not be separated from pictures and graphics. This study aims to see the initial ability of prospective physics teacher students in interpreting graphs. This mapping is useful for making policy plans for lecturers in planning future physics lessons. This type of research is descriptive research involving 79 respondents. Data collection is done by giving a graph interpretation ability test which consists of 3 indicators, namely graphs interpretation to mathematics, graphs interpretation to descriptions, and graph interpretation to images. From the results of data analysis using descriptive statistics, it was f...
Students‘ Ability to Identify The Types of Motion of Objects Through Kinematics Graphs
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education, ICOME 2021, 3-5 November 2021, Tanjungpinang, Riau Islands, Indonesia, 2022
Problems in physics are often presented in various representations, meanwhile the ability of students to provide solutions to these problems shows the level of conceptual understanding. This research is a descriptive survey that involves 46 biology education students of FKIP UMRAH who were in their first year of study. The data were collected through tests by using 2 essay questions on the topic of kinematics presented in graphical form. This research aimed to determine the ability of students to identify the types of motion of objects through graphs. Consequently, the results showed that there were still difficulties in identifying the types of objects' motion through graphs. This difficulty was due to a lack of conceptual understanding and the inability to read the data on the graph.
Theorizing STEM Education in the 21st Century, 2020
Students' comprehension of graphs may be affected by the characteristics of the discipline in which the graph is used, the type of the task, as well as the background of the students who are the readers or interpreters of the graph. This research study investigated these aspects of the graph comprehension from 152 first year undergraduate physics students by comparing their responses to the corresponding tasks in the mathematics and physics disciplines. The discipline characteristics were analysed for four task-related constructs, namely coordinates, representations, area and slope. Students' responses to corresponding visual decoding and judgement tasks set in mathematics and kinematics contexts were statistically compared. The effects of the participants' gender, year of school completion and study course were determined as reader characteristics. The results of the empirical study indicated that participants generally transferred their mathematics knowledge on coordinates and representation of straight-line graphs to the physics contexts, but not in the cases of parabolic and hyperbolic functions or area under graphs. Insufficient understanding of the slope concept contributed to weak performances on this construct in both mathematics and physics contexts. Discipline characteristics seem to play a vital role in students' understanding, whilst reader characteristics had insignificant to medium effects on their responses.
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 2021
This research aims to investigate and compare students’ responses in solving physics problems about kinematics concepts. The students’ responses cover the conceptual understanding as overall performance, representational abilities, and students’ response patterns.This research is a non-experimental survey research with thequantitative-descriptive approach. The research samples consisted of 56 students determined by purposive sampling technique. The research instrument was adapted from the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) in Physport Assessmentwhich has been validated. The students’ responses were analyzedusing descriptive statistics to measure the average and standard deviation. Students’ answers were also grouped according to the type of representation and pattern of presentation in percentages. The results showed a significant difference between the tenth-grade students and eleventh-grade students' understanding of the Kinematics concept. Furthermore, the students found it easier...
Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2013
This study investigates university students' understanding of graphs in three different domains: mathematics, physics (kinematics), and contexts other than physics. Eight sets of parallel mathematics, physics, and other context questions about graphs were developed. A test consisting of these eight sets of questions (24 questions in all) was administered to 385 first year students at University of Zagreb who were either prospective physics or mathematics teachers or prospective physicists or mathematicians. Rasch analysis of data was conducted and linear measures for item difficulties were obtained. Average difficulties of items in three domains (mathematics, physics, and other contexts) and over two concepts (graph slope, area under the graph) were computed and compared. Analysis suggests that the variation of average difficulty among the three domains is much smaller for the concept of graph slope than for the concept of area under the graph. Most of the slope items are very close in difficulty, suggesting that students who have developed sufficient understanding of graph slope in mathematics are generally able to transfer it almost equally successfully to other contexts. A large difference was found between the difficulty of the concept of area under the graph in physics and other contexts on one side and mathematics on the other side. Comparison of average difficulty of the three domains suggests that mathematics without context is the easiest domain for students. Adding either physics or other context to mathematical items generally seems to increase item difficulty. No significant difference was found between the average item difficulty in physics and contexts other than physics, suggesting that physics (kinematics) remains a difficult context for most students despite the received instruction on kinematics in high school.
Modifying the test of understanding graphs in kinematics
In this article, we present several modifications to the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics. The most significant changes are (i) the addition and removal of items to achieve parallelism in the objectives (dimensions) of the test, thus allowing comparisons of students' performance that were not possible with the original version, and (ii) changes to the distractors of some of the original items that represent the most frequent alternative conceptions. The final modified version (after an iterative process involving four administrations of test variations over two years) was administered to 471 students of an introductory university physics course at a large private university in Mexico. When analyzing the final modified version of the test it was found that the added items satisfied the statistical tests of difficulty, discriminatory power, and reliability; also, that the great majority of the modified distractors were effective in terms of their frequency selection and discriminatory power; and, that the final modified version of the test satisfied the reliability and discriminatory power criteria as well as the original test. Here, we also show the use of the new version of the test, presenting a new analysis of students' understanding not possible to do before with the original version of the test, specifically regarding the objectives and items that in the new version meet parallelisms. Finally, in the PhysPort project (physport.org), we present the final modified version of the test. It can be used by teachers and researchers to assess students' understanding of graphs in kinematics, as well as their learning about them.
Learners’ conceptual resources for learning kinematics graphs
2015
Learners‟ difficulty in the application of basic graphs concepts to solve kinematics graphs problems contributes to underperformance in physical sciences. Their ability to handle problems in kinematics graphs could be enhanced if they have effective conceptual resources on graphs. In South Africa, this underperformance could be due to a gap between the GET [General Education and Training] and FET [Further Education and Training] band‟s requirements on graphs. For this reason this study selected to investigate the conceptual resources acquired by grade 10 learners from grade 9 that can be used productively for the learning of kinematics graphs in grade 10. The use of mixed method approach was considered appropriate for this study. The mixed method depended on a quantitative method (questionnaire) to produce precise and measurable data, while a qualitative method (interviews) was to enhance the understanding of the data produced by the quantitative method. Patterns and trends in learn...
High School Students’ User Skills Concerning Force and Motion Graphs
Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi, 2023
In this study, the aim was to examine Year 11 students' skills of reading-interpreting and drawing graphs of force and motion and to lay bare the relationship between graph reading-interpretation and drawing graphs. Conducted in the survey model, the study was realised with the participation of 209 Year 11 students studying at Anatolian high schools in Ankara. Graph Reading and Interpretation Skills Test (GRIST) which includes 13 multiple-choice items and Graph Drawing Skills Form (GDSF) which includes 5 open-ended items were used as data collection tools. At the end of the study, it was determined that students have an intermediate level of success in reading and interpreting graphs while they have a low level of success in drawing graphs. It was concluded that students' graph reading and interpretation skills and their graph drawing skills are related to one another.
Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika
isomorphic and conventional to open-ended can reflect students' learning difficulties on kinematic's graphs. This study used a quantitative descriptive form of survey research. The respondents were twenty-nine senior high school students from Semarang. The instruments were adopted from the Test of Understanding Graphs-Kinematic (TUG-K) by Robert J.Beichner (1994). There were nine questions used from the TUG-K with open-ended questions that have been validated. The results show that students have difficulties learning about kinematic's graphs, and there is no relation between open-ended scores and the other two scores. Nonetheless, judging from the correlation coefficient, the correlation between open-ended and conventional tasks is 0.075, which means low correlation, while for isomorphic score and open-ended score in the amount of 0.109 is higher than the correlation of traditional and open-ended. This correlation is insignificant. However, the closest correlation direct...