Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers (original) (raw)
Related papers
Misunderstanding of the Indonesian Human Rights Activists on the Application of the Death Penalty
Asy-Syari'ah
This research mainly uses statistical data published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) in April 2014 to support the hypothesis of this research that “Human Rights Activists in Indonesia as in other countries have failed in comprehending the wisdom (hikmah) of the application of Capital Punishment”. This study found that: (1) the hypothesis of this research was strongly supported by the data; (2) the application of Syari`ah Criminal Law in Saudi Arabia has been an unchallenged proof for the wisdom (hikmah) behind the application of Capital Punishment by keeping the level of murder crime to a low rate which sharply contrast to many countries which apply positive laws which are based on a social contract between the ruler and the ruled, such as in The United States and Mexico; and (3) In upholding the true justice in Islamic Criminal Law, punishment can only be awarded to the criminals in a society where the Islamic ideal of social justice has been achieved. Abstr...
A Discourse of Capital Punishment in the Islamic Law and Human Rights Law
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society
The death penalty for convicts is an age-old subject to a lot of criticism from various quarters. The implementation of the death penalty is considered inconsistent with the principles of human rights which are principles of international law where countries cannot refuse because of common alignments, namely the right to life. The punishment of m ati raises pros and cons in Indonesian society, some agree with this punishment because the death penalty intends to protect the public interest and not a few oppose it, they argue that the death penalty is contrary to human rights principles. This fact encourages the author to examine the implementation of the death penalty based on human rights and Islamic law, this is because the majority of Indonesians are adherents of the Islamic religion and also because the implementation of the death penalty is still carried out in Indonesia in certain crime cases. To examine this conflict, the author uses a normative juridical method with the conc...
Death Penalty and Human Rights in Indonesia
International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2020
The aim of the research was to investigate whether the applicable death penalty in the Criminal Laws of Republic of Indonesia violates the human rights or not. To achieve the objectives of the research, both legal research and social-legal research method were used. Then, the respondents of the research were the representative supreme courts, official commissions, law experts, religious leaders and non-governmental organization. Depth interview and document study were chosen as data sources of the research, then, interview guidelines, note-taking, and voice recorder were used to be the instruments of the research. Death penalty is not contradictory with human rights as stated in Presidential Regulation No 2 of 1964 discussing the death penalty in Indonesia is applicable for those who commit serious crimes, namely; murder, drug possession, terrorist, and corruption. It is also corresponding to International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 7 Verse (2) – (6), which is stated that death penalty must be performed in proper methodology without both imprisonment for years and mental suffering. Death penalty is legally stated in Indonesia law that it is not recognized as cruel action in which the death penalty have never been resulting both physical and psychological pain as well as stated in Covenant and Political Right.
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Islamic law provides a sense of justice including in the threat of sanctions for crimes committed, Islamic law places punishments commensurate with the crimes so as to create a sense of deterrent effect for perpetrators and society. Including the death penalty. This paper raises two issues that will be discussed, namely: How is the contribution of Islamic law in determining death penalty laws in Indonesia and how is the legal politics of death penalty provisions applicable in Indonesia based on Pancasila? The Normative Juridical Approach is used as the writing technique of this research. This study aims to conduct legal research using library materials, secondary data, and original data as additional data. From the discussion of this paper, it can be concluded that the existence of Islamic law, especially regarding the death penalty in Indonesia, has a very strong contribution to punishment in general in Indonesia. Because Islamic law, especially in the case of the death penalty, de...
An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law
Sriwijaya Law Review
This research uses normative juridical approach to study on the analysis of the death penalty executions and the legal policy of death executions in Indonesia. There are delays on death executions for the convicted person since they entitled to using rights namely filing a judicial review (PK/Peninjauan Kembali). Furthermore, the legal loophole in the execution of the death penalty by the publication of the Constitutional Court Number 107 / PUU-XIII / 2015 which assert that the Attorney as the executor can ask the convicted person or his family whether to use their rights or not if the convict clearly does not want to use his rights, the executions will be carried out. Legal policy on threats and the implementation of the death penalty in the draft of criminal code was agreed by draftsman of the bill with the solutions. The draftsman of the bill agrees that the death penalty will be an alternative punishment sentenced as a last resort to protect the society. The bill also regulates ...
Indonesian Death Penalty: Seen from the Concept Based on Human Rights
Diponegoro Law Review, 2020
In the case of death penalty, Indonesia is a retentionist state of death penalty. It is evidenced through the regulation such as The Act Number 35 year 2009 on narcotics, The Act Number 1 year 1946 on criminal law regulation, The Act Number 31 year 1999 Jo The Act number 20 year 2001 about corruption and so on. Although Indonesia belongs to a retentionist country against death penalty, in the implementation remains in accordance with human rights. It was evidenced by ratifying international treaties relating to human rights and having legislation on human rights.
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum
The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to g...
Abolition of the Death Penalty in Indonesia: a Conceptual Framework for Action
abolishing the death penalty in Indonesia will be a hard task, because capital punishment has powerful supporters who include (among others) the State apparatus and bureaucracy, the President, the Attorney General and religious leaders. In Indonesia human rights organizations such as KontraS and IMPARSIAL are currently working to abolish the death penalty. We should work with them by promoting a moratorium on the death penalty in a number of ways, such as raising public awareness, celebrating Anti-Death Penalty Day on October 10 every year, and through advocacy until Indonesia ratifies the Second Optional Protocol of ICCPR. Until that time, Indonesia will continue to violate the right to life.
The Call for Abolition of Death Penalty: Islamic Law versus International Human Rights Law
Journal: Advanced Science Letters. Vol. 23, Number 9. September 2017. ISSN: 1936- 6612 (Print): EISSN: 1936-7317 (Online) Publisher: American Scientific Publishers. California, U.S.A. , 2017
An old and ongoing dialogue between religion and international law which raises the question of whether both are foes or friends seems to have found a place in the global debate on the call for the abolition of death penalty. With respect to the debate, two opposing sides were identified. The first being the promoting secular bloc which is the Western-styled international human rights system, while the other is the opposing religious side which is the Islamic Law system. It is, thus, intriguing to ascertain whether the respective positions of the international human rights system; a secular law and that of the Islamic Law; a religious law on the abolition of death penalty are irreconcilable. This becomes particularly necessary since whenever any reference is made to the rejection of the call, the charge is usually and invariably directed against the religion of Islam. This paper, therefore, examines the various issues of divergence between the two opposing systems in order to have a proper grasp of the differing position as maintained by Islamic Law on the call for the abolition of death penalty and why it takes that side. Thus, the overall ideal position that should be objectively considered from the points of view of the two opposing sides whenever there is a dialogue on the matter is also put forth in the study.