The Rites and Ministries of the Canons : Liturgical Rubrics to Vernacular Gospels and their Functions in a European Context (original) (raw)
Related papers
Early Christian Gospels: Their Production and Transmission
Papyrological Florentina 47, 2016
Early Christian Gospels: their Production and Transmission greatly increases our understanding of the historical circumstances in which early (i.e., c. 150 to the early fourth century) canonical and non-canonical gospels were produced and transmitted. Prior analysis of non-canonical gospels in relation to the canonical gospels has usually been conducted solely from a theological perspective. In addition, early gospels are often treated simply as texts printed in a critical edition. In the process, their essential nature, the fact that they are ancient manuscripts with individual characteristics, has been overlooked. By comparing canonical and non-canonical gospels holistically—in terms of their codicology (or, in a few cases, ‘voluminology’), production characteristics, scribal tendencies, and textual transmission—Early Christian Gospels represents a major advance in methodology. Its conclusions are compelling, not only by virtue of the exhaustive comparison, but also because several lines of analysis coalesce to confirm the overall findings of the book. (See http://www.gonnelli.it/uk/papyrologica-florentina/vol-47-early-christian-gospels-their-production-.asp)
2014
Manuscript Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 6298 contains an as yet unexamined fragment of the second batch of the gospel glosses (EvII) from the biblical commentaries of the Canterbury School inserted as an addition in fol. 3r of the manuscript. In this article, I describe this fragment, and I attempt to contextualize its insertion into the manuscript. It seems likely that the glosses were entered into the manuscript, together with some additional excerpts in the same folio, either in one of the centres in the Anglo-Saxon missionary area in Germany, where the manuscript originated, or at Freising, where the manuscript was kept at a later date.
the cambridge companion to THE GOSPELS
The four gospels are a central part of the Christian canon of scripture. This volume treats the gospels not just as historical sources, but also as crucial testimony to the life of God made known in Jesus Christ. This approach helps to overcome the sometimes damaging split between critical gospel study and questions of theology, ethics and the life of faith. The essays are by acknowledged experts in a range of theological disciplines. The first section considers what are appropriate ways of reading the gospels given the kinds of texts they are. The second, central section covers the contents of the gospels. The third section looks at the impact of the gospels in church and society across history and up to the present day. stephen c. barton is Reader in New Testament in the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Durham, England, and a nonstipendiary minister at St John's Church, Neville's Cross. His books include Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library isbn-13 978-0-521-80766-1 hardback isbn-10 0-521-80766-2 hardback isbn-13 978-0-521-00261-5 paperback isbn-10 0-521-00261-3 paperback
The Codex 'Lindisfarnensis' (London, British Library, Cotton Nero D. iv, early eighth century) was glossed in Old English by the tenth-century priest Aldred. Aldred's colophon purports to give information about the eighth-century makers of the manuscript, at Lindisfarne. What is actually reliable about this highly literary colophon is Aldred's purpose in writing the gloss: to give the Evangelists a voice to address 'all the brothers' − particularly the Latinless. We propose new interpretations of three OE words (gihamadi, inlad, ora) misunderstood before. Aldred was learned; his sources extend from Ovid through the Fathers to contemporary texts.
This book testifies to the vitality of the liturgy in later tenth-and eleventh-century England. 1 New types of liturgical books were created, older rites were revised and new ones introduced. Occasionally, we have evidence for the individuals involved in reworking the liturgy and for whom it had such significance: Archbishop Wulfstan and his probable interest in the Chrism Mass; AEthelwold's attachment to the Psalterium Romanum; Wulfstan of Winchester's influence on the chant of the Old Minster, Winchester. 2 They are tantalizing reminders of the many men (and women) who compiled, collected, commissioned and performed the liturgy.
The Thirteenth-Century Pandect and the Liturgy: Bibles with Missals
in Form and Function in the Late Medieval Bible, eds. Eyal Poleg and Laura Light, 2013
This is a preliminary study based on my own examination of seventeen of the twentysix Bibles; the remainder I know through catalogue descriptions and other studies (see Appendix). A careful examination of all these Bibles, and a comparison of the Mass texts included in each is needed for a full exploration of this topic. I would like to thank Eyal Poleg for allowing me to consult his dissertation, Mediations of the Bible in Late Medieval England, University of London,
Canones: The Art of Harmony. The Canon Tables of the Four Gospels
The so-called ‘Canon Tables’ of the Christian Gospels are an absolutely remarkable feature of the early, late antique, and medieval Christian manuscript cultures of East and West, the invention of which is commonly attributed to Eusebius and dated to first decades of the fourth century AD. Intended to host a technical device for structuring, organizing, and navigating the Four Gospels united in a single codex – and, in doing so, building upon and bringing to completion previous endeavours – the Canon Tables were apparently from the beginning a highly complex combination of text, numbers and images, that became an integral and fixed part of all the manuscripts containing the Four Gospels as Sacred Scripture of the Christians and can be seen as exemplary for the formation, development and spreading of a specific Christian manuscript culture across East and West AD 300 and 800. In the footsteps of Carl Nordenfalk’s masterly publication of 1938 and few following contributions, this book offers an updated overview on the topic of ‘Canon Tables’ in a comparative perspective and with a precise look at their context of origin, their visual appearance, their meaning, function and their usage in different times, domains, and cultures.