Hubs and centers as transitional change strategy for library collaboration (original) (raw)
Related papers
University for Business and Technology University Libraries and Knowledge Center: A concept paper
2017
The most significant innovation enables the realization of far greater human potential. The catalyst of such creativity in higher education is the acquisition of new knowledge and the living of new experiences. Then, within innovation and incubation environments, new thinking enriches knowledge handed down from previous generations, enlivens contemporary lives and informs future growth. Emergent knowledge encourages recognition of the limitations of traditional academic disciplines, exploration of new interdisciplinary frontiers, and, from this, novel transdisciplinary insights that unlock human potential and improve human conditions. In response, the University for Business and Technology intends to build collaboration environments to enable discovery and access, interpretation and analysis, creation and sharing of knowledge. These aspirations recognize the synergies possible when individual discovery is reinforced by collective inquiry with the shared purpose of using information ...
2017
Our research examined the degree to which behaviors and learning associated with creativity and innovation were supported in five academic library spaces and three other spaces at a mid-sized university. Based on survey data from 226 students, we apply a number of statistical techniques to measure student perceptions of the types of learning and behavior associated with the selected spaces. We found that the on-campus makerspace located outside the library encouraged the most innovative behaviors and exploration of new ideas. Within the library, collaboration rooms were the best spaces for encouraging creativity. There is an opportunity for the academic library to be reconceptualized as a place to foster creativity and innovation in students. We believe that academic libraries should continue to offer a variety of spaces for students, including quiet spaces for reflection, noisy spaces for collaboration and networking, and makerspaces for experimentation
Journal of Library Administration
This article describes the role of librarians as integral partners in the development and implementation of an innovative university quality enhancement plan designed to promote success for undergraduate students seeking major and career clarity. Through collaboration with the university's center for teaching and learning, librarians are expanding their influence across campus and enhancing their skills as teachers, instructional designers, and institutional change agents. Initial assessment results suggest that librarians are having a demonstrable impact on students' information literacy self-efficacy. The article discusses opportunities and challenges associated with largescale collaboration from an administrative and organizational perspective, including recommendations to facilitate success.
Library-Faculty-Vendor Partnership to Create Stem Digital Learning Activities
2013
Olin College of Engineering's Library staff set a 2013 academic year goal to transform their instructional program. Grounded in ACRL standards and ABET accreditation criteria, the program would become workshop-based, combining classroom experiences with digital exercises and tools. Library Director Magnoni began work with a materials science faculty member to design a research rubric for the digital exercise. Following a brainstorming session, a broad outline was created. Magnoni turned the outline into a diagram, and then created the initial exercise as well as a set of research tips for use with the course subject guide. Both the faculty member and Magnoni would collect electronic copies of the exercise. Students would also keep copies for their own reference. To facilitate this sharing, a simple Microsoft Word document was created. The document included page breaks between research elements, and students could document their process, save as they moved through pieces, and then both keep and send copies. The research tips were saved in a PDF document and a course subject guide already existed on the LibGuides platform. These three pieces: an exercise in Microsoft Word format, research tips in PDF format, and a subject guide delivered on the LibGuides platform, made up the test elements. Two rounds of testing were accomplished in the experiment's first week, with modifications made for different course offerings. In addition to faculty and student feedback, Magnoni realized shortcomings of the three different formats for delivery. Through a conversation with Ricords of Credo, a Literati subscription facilitated the creation of engaging and interactive multimedia learning materials. This paper will discuss the conception and development of the research rubric, online portal and interactive tutorials, along with assessment and accreditation potential. The feedback and iteration process will be explored, and the value of the library-faculty-vendor partnership highlighted.
From Co-Location to Collaboration: Working Together to Improve Student Learning
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 2015
An academic librarian and the coordinator of a campus tutoring and writing center recently relocated to the library researched their value to second-year students. Differences in the amount and type of available data called for conducting in-depth interviews with students about their research and writing processes. The researchers also reviewed relevant material regarding similar collaborative efforts at other college and universities. The gaps revealed in the environmental scan along with the best practices of librarian/writing center collaboration helped determine future steps needed for both units to move from mere co-location to working in true collaboration. FROM CO-LOCATION TO COLLABORATION 2 Collaboration is key to academic libraries' services. Within libraries, departments work together to improve efficiency for user access. Externally, libraries seek campus partners in helping students achieve academic success. As mentioned in the 2011 "ACRL Standards for Libraries in Higher Education" academic libraries should develop partnerships toward the goal of "advancing and sustaining their role as partners in educating students" (5). Although not mentioned in the standards, the campus writing center is an obvious choice as partner, since students seek feedback from writing center tutors at various stages of their writing process. Both the library and the writing center are committed to helping students meet their academic goals (Ferer 2012, 544). As Elmborg states, "treating these two domains as separate, we create a disconnection" in our students' learning (2006, 7). The push for these two services to join forces may vary. For some libraries budgetary constraints drive the decision, while in others, conveniently locating services that support the institution's academic mission is key (Elmborg 2006; Cooke and Bledsoe 2008). Indeed, during the 2000s, libraries redesigning their spaces to integrate diverse student services and various technologies fueled the "learning commons" trend (Massis 2010, 161). Student learning, students' academic success, needs to be the goal for these collaborative programs on a college campus (Walter and Eodice 2007, 221). On our campus, the content tutoring program and the writing center are joined in what we call the Tutoring and Writing Center (the TWC). Following the relocation of the TWC into the Olin Library in January 2013, we wanted to understand our roles in our students' research and writing processes, and even more fundamentally, what that process is. Effective writing depends on competent research. The process is linear, from researching to writing, but it is also recursive. As we find new sources, we may change our focus, reshape our main questions. The process goes back to questioning, searching, and reading as we are writing what we're learning and thinking. We wanted to ascertain what our students'
Emerging Technologies, Innovation, and Academic Transformation A Report on the ELI Focus Session
2013
On October 2 and 3, 2012, the ELI teaching and learning community gathered for an online focus session on emerging technologies, innovation, and academic transformation. This white paper is a synthesis of the key ideas, themes, and concepts that came out of the focus session. This white paper also includes links to supporting focus session materials, recordings, and resources. It represents a harvesting of the key elements that we, as a teaching and learning community, need to keep in mind as we explore higher education incubator models, various pilot structures and processes, rubrics and methodologies for evaluating pilots, and considerations and tools to scale innovations to varying degrees.
Centers for Learning: Writing Centers and Libraries in Collaboration
2005
For dECAdES, WriTiNg CENTErS and academic libraries have provided a haven for students needing assistance, information, or simply a quiet “friendly” place to focus on learning and literacy. recently, these two entities have begun to consider formal partnerships. Why? Because, as writing center directors, WAC professionals, and librarians are well aware, the academic environment is rapidly changing on all fronts. Administrators are more concerned than ever with writing proficiency, information literacy and student retention. And students, though more tech savvy, often seem to be unprepared to judge the credibility and usefulness of sources of information and unskilled at incorporating such material into their writing. in response to these developments, librarians and writing center professionals have recently begun to examine one another’s discourse and have discovered some remarkable and productive affinities in their evolving theory and practice. For example, as Colleen Boff and Ba...