Stakeholders Opinions on Multi-Use Deep Water Offshore Platform in Hsiao-Liu-Chiu, Taiwan (original) (raw)
Related papers
Supporting BLUE Growth: Eliciting Stakeholders' preferences for Multiple-Use Offshore Platforms
2015
The objective of this paper is to elicit stakeholder preferences in relation to different Multiple Use Offshore Platforms (MUOP) designs produced by the TROPOS project (www.troposplatform.eu) for the Liuqiu Island, Taiwan using the Choice Experiment (CE) method. To authors/ acknowledge, this is the first non-market valuation of multiple use offshore platforms and definitely the first using CE in this context. The MUOP concept is defined as a floating platform moored in Taiwan shallow waters located offshore and concerned as a sustainable and ecologic location, which supports the development of the local economy and serves as an example of sustainable development in offshore environments. The CE was conducted on tourists and residents of the area. A ranking preference technique with visual aids was used, in order to obtain a more complete characterization of the respondentsAƒÂ¢A¯Â?½A¯Â?½ preference structure. The attributes used were the environmental impacts of the modules (using ...
2016
Seas and oceans offer a vast renewable energy resource and production possibilities with great potential for innovation and growth. Multi-purpose offshore platforms are ocean energy and aquaculture synergies developed in order to achieve efficient use of marine space. Regarding the construction and operation of such infrastructures, environmental and socio-economic benefits should be taken into account. This chapter uses the Ecosystem Services approach and the total economic framework for evaluating different designs of multi-purpose offshore platforms and a participatory approach to ensure their public acceptability.
In this paper a Methodology for Integrated Socio-Economic Assessment (MISEA) of the viability and sustainability of different designs of Multi-Use Offshore Platforms (MUOPs) is presented. MUOPs are designed for multi-use of ocean space for energy extraction (wind power production and wave energy), aquaculture and transport maritime services. The developed methodology allows identification, valuation and assessment of: the potential range of impacts of a number of feasible designs of MUOP investments, and the likely responses of those impacted by the investment project. This methodology provides decision-makers with a valuable decision tool to assess whether a MUOP project increases the overall social welfare and hence should be undertaken, under alternative specifications regarding its design, the discount rate and the stream of net benefits, if a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is to be followed or sensitivity analysis of selected criteria in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework. Such a methodology is also crucial for facilitating of the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD adopted in June 2008) that aims to achieve good environmental status of the EU's marine waters by 2020 and to protect the resource base upon which marine-related economic and social activities depend. According to the MSFD each member state must draw up a program of cost-effective measures, while prior to any new measure an impact assessment which contains a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the proposed measures is required.
Bugüne kadar Türkiye'de yapay resif alanlarının etkin kullanımı ve paylaşımıyla ilgili ticari balıkçılar, amatör balıkçılar ve yöre sakinlerini ele alan farklı paydaş gruplarının kararları değerlendirilmemiştir. Bu çalışmada, söz konusu denizel alanla ilgili mevcut durum, yapay resif ve deniz rezervi senaryonlarını içeren deneysel senaryolarla paydaşların kararlarını analiz etmek üzere çoklu karar verme sürecinde yaygın olarak kullanılan bir teknik (Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci) kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, yapay resif uygulaması ticari ve amatör balıkçılar tarafından desteklenmiştir. Ancak amaçlanan yapay resif yapılarının gelecek kullanım hakları ile ilgili görüşler araştırma grupları arasında farklılık göstermiştir. Amaçlanan yapay resiflerin farklı paydaş grupları arasında tahsis edilmesi üç grup tarafından da % 50'nin üzerinde kabul görmüştür. Gelecek çalışmalar için model olacak bu çalışmada yapay resiflerin önemi, potansiyel kullanıcıların yüksek destekleme eğilimiyle ekonomik, biyolojik ve sosyal faydaları ele alınarak ortaya koyulmuştur.
The management implications of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) cover the interactions and two-way effects between the ecosystem and local residents. Hence, support or resistance from stakeholders is critical to management effectiveness. The inclusion of the perspectives of stakeholders into the MPAs of sustainable utilization can reduce opposition and conflict, improving the effectiveness of MPA management through the input of local residents. This study used interviews, questionnaire surveys, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process to obtain the opinions of different groups regarding the choices and preferences of stakeholders in the assessed factors of the sustainable utilization of MPAs in Green Island, Taiwan. The results showed that the stakeholder groups have a consensus on the "completeness of ecosystems," "processing of wastes and pollutants," and "integrated management." These results provide insight into the varying perspectives held by individual groups, accelerating the integration of different opinions in order to facilitate appropriate solutions and smooth negotiations.
encora.corila.it
This paper presents an original methodology developed to facilitate the apprehension of maritime topics into regional planning documents, by analyzing economic and environmental effects of maritime activities and uses. This work is a part of the SYSCOLAG program which is a pilot operation at national level for experimenting with a knowledge-pooling system applied to the field of integrated coastal area management (ICAM). SYSCOLAG aims to constitute an interface between 'knowledge' and the 'users of knowledge' on questions related to the conservation and the development of the coastal zone of the Languedoc-Roussillon. With this aim, a pilot model have been developed to propose a methodology to evaluate economic and environmental effects of maritime activity and uses in a territorial planning document. The application of this pilot model to the Thau case study have been realised on the basis of working groups of experts (scientists, local authorities and endusers) and also by the organisation of public meetings at the initiative of the local authority (Syndicat Mixte du Bassin de Thau) as part of the consultation process of this management plan. In this pilot model, which is the furthest advanced in the current state of progress of the programme, this phase made it possible to identify the stakes and the priorities for the sustainable development of the territory concerned (Thau lagoon) as well as the available resources (e.g. informations), which constitute the basis for the development of suitable information synopses. Here, the methodology developed, aims at completing the commonly used and mainly terrestrial economic valuation, and environmental impact analyses. Moreover, it will be highlighted that, even if this tool is specific to maritime activities and uses, this work allows to go hand in hand with any project of Integrated Coastal Zone Management.
2020
This chapter describes a decision support tool that was designed and developed for the MERMAID project (EU-FP7), which has already indicated in this book developed concepts for next-generation offshore platforms for multi-use of ocean space for energy extraction, aquaculture and platform-related transport. Specifically, it evaluated the potential and challenges of building multi-use offshore platforms (MUOPs). The MERMAID project considers four offshore study sites for multi-use offshore platforms, Atlantic Ocean site, Wadden - North Sea site, Baltic sea site, and Mediterranean Sea site. Each site is considered in terms of its available resources and unique features. This tool was part of the framework for assessing the socio-economic impact of MUOPs, and as such, utilized web and data analytics state of the art technologies in order to provide researchers with a framework for evaluating feasibility and potential of each MUOP's proposed design and location.
Participatory Design of Multi-Use Platforms at Sea
European oceans are subject to rapid development. New activities such as aquaculture and ocean energy have gained importance. This triggers interest in " multi-use platforms at sea " (MUPS), i.e., areas at sea in which different activities are combined. MUPS are complex features with regards to technology, governance, and financial, socioeconomic, and environmental aspects. To identify realistic and sustainable solutions and designs for MUPS, the MERMAID project applied a participatory design process (PDP) involving a range of stakeholders representing companies, authorities, researchers, and NGOs. This paper evaluates if and how the participatory design process contributed to the design of multi-use platforms. It is based on interviews with the managers of the case study sites and a questionnaire administered to all stakeholders participating in the PDP workshops. Analyzing the four case studies, we conclude that the participatory design process has had a valuable contribution to the development of the four different designs of MUPS, even though the preconditions for carrying out a participatory design process differed between sites. In all four cases, the process has been beneficial in generating new and shared knowledge. It brought new design issues to the table and increased knowledge and understanding among the different stakeholders.
A Socio-Economic Toolbox of Artificial Reef Projects
2008
It is widely accepted that in sea bottom areas where there is a scarcity of rocky formations and declining marine fish due to fisheries pressure, the deployment of artificial reefs (ARs) is a possible way to mitigate the problem. If ARs have an ecosystem-based fisheries management goal that means their presence is believed to be a sine qua non condition to maintain the sustainability of coastal ecosystems. However, decisions relating to the deployment and management of ARs arguably need to be guided by the dictum that 'an artificial reef that is not useful to people is not a successful reef'. The issue of 'AR usefulness' is raised because there are many studies on reef assessment, but usually focusing solely on biological approaches. Thus, these approaches are usually not enough to prove or refute the above premise. So, it is of fundamental importance to involve the affected people, i.e., stakeholders. With that in mind, the present study presents a socioeconomic 'toolbox' where it is intended to find out people's involvement, belief, attitude and behavior concerning artificial reef's deployment. The toolbox is based on a flexible research design and includes three types of assessment that can be done in the scope of social and economic evaluation of ARs, namely: (1) Monitoring and description, (2) Social analysis, and (3) Economic assessment. In each one there are used different data collection and measurement techniques.