Book Review: COMMUNITY PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, Jacquelynne Eccles and Jennifer A. Gootman (eds), Washington D.C.: National Academic Press, 2002, 411 pp (original) (raw)
Related papers
Elements of Effective Community-Based Youth Programs
1996
As youth development professionals, as parents, and as friends and neighbors in a community we are acutely aware of the suffering and loss of human potential that accompany young peoples' decisions to engage in problem behaviors (e.g., drugs and alcohol, delinquency, unsafe sex and failure in school). When we consider this loss on a national level the concern we feel for the individuals caught up in high risk behavior must become a concern for the society as a whole. Whether the youth of today participate in high risk behavior or not, they will be affected by living in a society where so many other youth have minimized their chances to become healthy productive adults. It is not surprising that as the percentage of today's youth identified as "at risk" grows to shocking proportions, we often hear this generation referred to as the "lost generation" or as a generation in crisis. A crisis is generally defined as "any sudden interruption in the normal c...
dsadf, 2018
The concept of Community Youth Development is introduced and explained to raise the level of accountability, significance, and urgency for developing comprehensive responses to the epidemic of risk facing America's youth. The two theoretical models of adolescence (i.e., Positive Youth Development and Risk and Resiliency) that are employed as the pillars of this approach are also presented. The key components that comprise the community youth development framework are discussed, along with implications for practitioners, researchers, and policy.
BHC Youth Program Inventory Survey 2013. Key Findings.
As part of its 10-year Building Health Communities (BHC) Initiative, The California Endowment (TCE) supported the healthy development of youth in 14 communities across the state. To this end, it has provided financial support to programs that engage youth in civic activities, including those that focus on youth development and youth organizing. These youth civic engagement programs have the potential to promote more healthful communities by influencing a) the behavior and beliefs of participating youth; and b) the responsiveness, commitment, and capacity of local institutions responsible for youths’ health and well-being. Our evaluation contains three main objectives: 1. To assess how and to what extent TCE funded youth programs: a) promote diverse youths’ health-related behaviors, psychological wellness, and investment in community well-being in the both the short term and long-term; b) impact the quality of interactions between youth and local healthcare, educational, and civic institutions. 2. To provide funded organizations information about the strengths of their programs and areas of growth. To this end, the evaluation will inform cross-site training opportunities. 3. To contribute to research on the health outcomes of youth development and youth organizing programming targeting low-income and diverse youth.
2019
Youth in low-income urban settings face a variety of challenges, or risk factors. These youth often lack resources to meet their personal and professional goals, and have higher levels of exposure to violence, crime, and substance abuse, among other risky behaviors, when compared with youth who reside in other areas (Farrell & Johnson, 2005). In addition, in the US, 26% of youth are unsupervised in the afternoon hours directly after school, which are also the most critical hours for risky behavior and juvenile crime (After School Alliance, 2009).