Bridging a patient with acute liver failure to liver transplantation by the AMC-bioartificial liver (original) (raw)
Related papers
Xenotransplantation, 2010
Clinical use of porcine cell-based bioartificial liver (BAL) support in acute liver failure as bridging therapy for liver transplantation exposes the patient to the risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) to human. This risk may be enhanced when patients receive liver transplant and are subsequently immunosuppressed. As further follow-up of previously reported patients (Di Nicuolo et al. 2005), an assessment of PERV infection was made in the same patient population pharmacologically immunosuppressed for several years after BAL treatment and in healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in the clinical trial at that time. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from eight patients treated with the Academic Medical Center-BAL (AMC-BAL), who survived to transplant, and 13 HCWs, who were involved in the trial, were assessed to detect PERV infection. A novel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay has been used. Eight patients who received a liver transplant after AMC-BAL treatment are still alive under long-term pharmacological immunosuppression. The current clinical follow-up ranges from 5.6 to 8.7 yr after BAL treatment. A new q-real-time PCR assay has been developed and validated to detect PERV infection. The limit of quantification of PERV DNA was ≥ 5 copies per 1 × 10(5) PBMCs. The linear dynamic range was from 5 × 10(0) to 5 × 10(6) copies. In both patients and HCWs, neither PERV DNA in PBMCs nor PERV RNA in plasma and PBMC samples have been found. Up to 8.7 yr after exposure to treatment with porcine liver cell-based BAL, no PERV infection has been found in long-term immunosuppressed patients and in HCWs by a new highly sensitive and specific q-real-time PCR assay.
Hepatitis Monthly, 2012
Hepatitis B infection is the main cause of liver related mortality in many countries including Iran. Liver transplantation in cirrhosis due to HBV infection before 1990 was an absolute contraindication. Recurrent infection was a significant event in post liver transplant setting and resulted in increased risk of graft failure and death except successful transplanted individuals. Advances in antiviral prophylaxis have now made graft reinfection majority patients as a rare event. Graft and patient survival have been improved significantly during the past two decades, and consequences of transplantation for hepatitis B virus are now superior to those achieved for most other indications. This has encouraged many centers including the major liver transplantation center of Iran, in Shiraz, to provide liver transplantation to more patients with HBV related end stage liver disease. Management of these patients begins before transplantation along with special care after transplantation. There are some myths and doubts in the management of these patients and one should always balance the cost and efficiency. One of the major concerns is the high economic and social cost of recurrence and all possible efforts should be performed to avoid the ominous consequences of reinfection. Having a clear scientific grasp on the management of HBV cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation, options and protocols, and changing the concept which HBV infected are contraindicated ones for liver transplantation, and future hopes in increasing patients survival after liver transplantation using the new nucleosides analogues and availability of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in the transplantation setting. This scientific report paper outlines the insights communicated at the HBV and liver transplantation symposium during 10th Congress of the Iranian Society for Organ Transplantation, May 2011, Shiraz, Iran.
Transplantation Proceedings, 2008
The indications for liver transplantation among patients with post-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis have changed over the past 35 years. We reviewed the long-term results of 47 patients treated with liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the perioperative regimen. In the initial experience, no immunoprophylaxis was adopted (no-IP; n ϭ 5). From 1988 -1996, an immunoprophylaxis scheme was adopted (HBIg; n ϭ 16). From 1997-2007, we adopted the combination of lamivudine and HBIg (LAM-HBIg; n ϭ 26). We calculated the prevalence of serological reinfection and patient survival at 1 to 20 years, using the 3 regimens. The recurrence rate was 75% in the group of untreated patients; 30% in the HBIg group; and 9% in the LAM-HBIg group. The overall survival was 67% at 5 years, and 64% at 10 and 20 years. The long-term survival for each of the 3 therapeutic approaches, namely, for the patients who did not receive any treatment, for the HBIg group, and for the LAM-HBIg group, were 20%, 50%, and 84%, respectively. We suggest to use the LAM-HBIg combination. Address reprint requests to Alfonso Avolio, MD,
Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B virus–related liver disease
Hepatology, 1991
Fifty-nine patients with prior hepatitis B virus infection underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. During the first 2 mo, mortality was not significantly different in the hepatitis B virus–infected group (25.5%) vs. a hepatitis B virus–immune control group (21%). Beyond 2 mo, the mortality, rate of graft loss, need for retransplantation and incidence of abnormal liver function were significantly higher in the hepatitis B virus–infected group. Treatment of the hepatitis B virus infection was attempted with passive immunization, combined active and passive immunization, α-interferon or nothing. The clinical outcome was not significantly influenced by any of these therapies. However, of the patients who lived more than 60 days, 6 of 22 treated with active plus passive immunization were cleared of HBsAg, something achieved once in 16 patients treated with α-interferon, never in 3 patients with passive immunization only and once in 4 patients with no therapy. In patients with recurrent hepatitis B virus infection, the pace of hepatitis development in the graft appeared to be accelerated, and this was particularly striking in patients who underwent multiple retransplantations at progressively shorter intervals. None of the patients who became HBsAg-negative had HBeAg preoperatively. (HEPATOLOGY 1991;13:619–626.)
Journal of Clinical Virology, 2003
Background: Acute liver failure (ALF) remains a disease with high mortality. Bioartificial liver support systems, which combine living cells of the liver in an extracorporeal circuit, have been successfully used in first clinical trials. The shortage of human organs to be used for bioreactors and the lack of safe and effective human liver cell lines have resulted in pigs becoming an important hepatic cell source. However, using these cells may be associated with the risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). PERVs are present in the genome of all pigs and are able to infect human cells in vitro. However, it remains unclear whether PERVs infect transplant recipients in vivo and, if so, whether they are pathogenic. Objectives: To detect antibodies directed against specific epitopes from PERVs in seven individuals who were treated with porcine liver cell bioreactor therapy prior to liver transplantation. Methods : Sera from seven patients treated with a hybrid liver support system based on porcine liver cells for ALF who survived the treatment and were discharged from hospital were investigated for antibodies against PERV. For this in addition to methods already reported (Xenotransplantation , new immunological detection methods were developed. Results: PERV-specific antibodies were found in none of the patients using Western blot assays based on purified virus or recombinant viral core and envelope proteins or ELISA based on synthetic diagnostic peptides. Conclusion: The assays used are specific and sensitive, and correlated in their diagnostic value. The data indicate that no PERV infection had occurred in none of the patients treated with the CellModule bioreactor containing porcine cells.
Living-donor liver transplant for HAV induced acute liver failure
Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics, 2020
Though HAV infection is prevalent in the general population, HAV-induced ALF is very rare.ALF due to HAV are more common in elder patients' group, and it has a worse prognosis. A 23-year-old south Indian male presented with fever, jaundice, and malaise, who had positive anti HAV IgM antibodies, developed hepatic encephalopathy which ultimately led to a diagnosis of acute liver failure due to acute hepatitis A virus infection. Despite the failure of supportive treatment, he was managed successfully with a living donor liver transplant.