Securitization in Financial Institutions` (original) (raw)
Related papers
Concept of Securitisation and Its Role in Promoting Economy and Capital Markets
It is widely believed that securitisation offers tremendous opportunities, and significant Benefits, in our country — to issuers and investors, and, from a broader social and Economic perspective, to the citizens and business organizations. Despite its potential, and notwithstanding recent growth, securitisation remains at a relatively early stage of development, and is still evolving as a mainstream capital markets financing mechanism. The understanding, usage and acceptance of Securitisation varies widely. A basic reason for this may be the relative novelty of securitisation. It has only recently been introduced in our country and does not enjoy the same level of familiarity and recognition as other, more traditional forms of debt and equity financing, among issuers, investors, gov-ernmental policymakers or the public. This paper examines the definition of securitisation and various terms used in the process of securitisation. The concept of securitisation is not static but dynamic. It constantly evolves and it is called as financial engineering. Its impact on overall economy, risks and benefits are examined. The paper on securitisation is concluded by its evaluation.
This Article fills a gap in commercial finance law. Despite the fact that “securitization” has become enormously important to capital markets — and is sometimes blamed for the credit crisis — we have no agreed understanding of the term. Various regulators and commentators have generated a wide range of definitions, but many are vague or omit crucial elements. Perhaps most surprising, the Dodd-Frank financial services reform — the most aggressive attempt yet to regulate securitization — does not define it at all. How can we regulate something without a shared conception of what it is?This Article assesses data on the performance and function of securitizations to develop a normative definition of the term based on its essential elements (its inputs, structure, and outputs) and its legitimate social and economic functions, namely providing a more effective means of connecting buyers and sellers of capital than traditional methods of financing, such as bank lending or issuing shares of...
Asset Securitization: The Unsecured Creditor\u27s Perspective
1998
The Article examines assumptions behind literature that uncritically assumes that securitization transactions are necessarily efficient, finding that these assumptions are unwarranted. The Article is the first to view securitization transactions from an unsecured creditor’s perspective, and concludes that from such a perspective, securitization is not the panacea its proponents claim it to be. The article first defines structured finance and describes the nature of the current market for asset-backed securities. Then, it outlines the benefits that securitization provides to originators and other transaction participants. With that background, it turns to the debate on the efficiency of secured transactions, applies the substance of this debate to structured finance transactions, and then examines the equitable challenges that may be made to avoid securitized asset transfers. The Article sounds a cautionary note concerning how securitization results in a general increase in the avail...