An investigation into how journalists experience economic and political pressures on their ethical decisions at the Nation Media Group in Kenya (original) (raw)
Related papers
Perspectives on the Role of Media Ethics in the Kenyan Print Media Landscape
The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
This study explores critical perspectives on the role of media ethics in the Kenyan print media landscape. In Kenya, the media plays an important role as a whistleblower. The media's, characterization as the fourth estate is critical of the role it plays to oversight the government. The Kenya print media is fast becoming a strong pillar in championing democracy, the rule of law and keeping the government of the day in check. However, the watchdog role has come into sharp focus following inaccurate reportage that has led to defamation cases being filed in court. In order to avoid defamation suits, the print media should uphold high ethical standards, seek the whole truth and ensure fair and balanced reporting. This paper concludes that media ethics is critical in ensuring that the print media remains socially responsible in dissemination of information to the public. This paper recommends that print media journalists should adhere to professional ethics as enshrined in the code of conduct for the practice of journalism in Kenya.
Ethical Journalism: The case of the adherence to the Code of Conduct in the Kenyan Media
Journalists are deemed as custodians of press freedom and it is their onus to feel ethically obliged to give their audiences information that is of public interest. In this study, we examined the extent to which journalists reflect on the code of conduct to make decisions on how to gather information, package information ,publish and distribute stories in media. Investigations were made on which decisions were made when to select appropriate channels are used to break the story; if moral journalistic considerations were made before relying the information to the public and whether media practitioners upheld ethical journalistic actions that minimised harm to other parties The theoretical and conceptual Framework was derived from Social responsibility theory; Deontological; Teleological; Situation and Utilitarianism theories of media ethics. The Target Population comprised of Media practitioners in in various Kenyan mainstream media houses who were selected using non-probability purposive sampling from three cadres of personnel ,specifically news editors, sub-editors and reporters this was a ffield survey with interview schedules that had predetermined set of questions and responses were voice recorded and transcribed for analysis Key findings indicated that a section of Kenyan media practitioners appeared apathetic to adhering to the ethical principles contained in the Second Schedule of the Media Act 2007.This study recommended the revision of the Media Council of Kenya’s Code of Conduct in clearly defining ‘Public Interest’ and as well as making distinctions in other areas that journalists find unclear in forums that involve the relevant stakeholders Further to , a revision of media houses’ in-house editorial policies that appropriately guide journalists in relation to areas that are not covered by the Media Council of Kenya’s Code of Conduct is in order. Key words: Media ethics, social responsibility, moral and ethical considerations
SSRG International Journal of Communication and Media Science, 2021
Influential discourses on news presentation across conventional newspapers consistently undervalue the final causality of insufficient journalistic professionalism in the embodiment of biased news on such platforms. This undervaluation manifests primarily in manifold media discourses in Kenya, where ongoing ampliative and existential statements on the concatenation of lower levels of journalistic professionalism, and biased news on newspapers, are either rudimentary or bland and vague. An iterative review of these discourses suggests that newspapers' news biases are products of external interference from market-forces and the most influential actors' egoism. This functionalist conceptual traction, which is deeply entrenched in the cognitions, affective, and evaluation of the kleptocratic class in the production of biased news in Kenya's press, intends to reproduce unhelpful topoi of looking at the dialectic consilience of such bias in its entirety. In the context of this straw position, there is a need to subsume this framework of thinking into that of a news reporter's unpropitious conduct in newsgathering and delivery. This paper is ergo pedestaled on interactionist dualism in demonstrating how a news reporter's deficient rectitude underpins a legacy of biased news in Kenya's press. It provides a perfect backdrop for a systematic and rigorous analysis by propounding, in a rationalist fashion, the exclusionary and inclusionary decisions that are derivable from a professional journalist ipso facto a print medium's news reporter. It makes an ineliminable link to the ideal observer theories of ethics in affording leverage points to reconcile journalistic unprofessionalism with pejorative news production. It adopts a qualitative systematic review research design in its underlying commitment to bring about such linkage to the fore by analyzing relevant secondary data. This analysis demonstrates inter-rater reliability through media experts' holistic views that many news reporters succumb to coercion in the form of goodies to produce biased news. There is Pyrrhonism that the trend will change, given the zeitgeist of this era that contributes to news reporters' lack of probity. It is proposed that individuals such as these experts are better placed to advocate for adopting a desirable and obligatory approach to news reporting in Kenya's press.
Journal of New Media and Mass Communication, 2015
The theme of this paper is that the communal approach should be used in solving moral hitches in journalism. The individualism and divisionism that permeate the practice of journalism in Kenya today should be thrown away since they are not only unKenyan but also professionally unpleasant. The article asserts that Kenyan journalism should have an ingrained self-correcting mechanism that facilitates journalists counseling one another. It is submitted herein that world journalism, equally overwhelmed with divisionist and selfish styles to the practice of ethical journalism, could learn from Kenya the value of journalistic solidarity and common problem-solving. The paper ends with a recommendation that the world needs journalism with a human face.
Mapping structural conditions of journalism in Kenya
2016
The media landscape in Kenya enjoys a broad range of state-owned, private and (non-commercial) community media outlets. However, this pluralism is challenged not only by a high level of concentration and cross-media ownership but also issues of political ownership. These structures are reflected in a high level of political/societal activity and parallelism of media, and an ambivalent journalism culture which fluctuates between critical and concordant, clientelist reporting. Within this context, the journalistic profession is marked by varying standards of journalism education and declining systems of self-control and self-regulation. Furthermore, journalists have a poor public reputation as well as low levels of professional security facilitating bribery and various forms of self-censorship.
Political economy of the Kenyan media - towards a culture of active citizen journalism
Global Media Journal African Edition, 2011
This paper utilises Hall's (1977) 'encoding-decoding' theory in the context of critical political economy theories of the media and cultural studies to explain the political, economic and cultural factors that influence media operation and content both at a macro and micro level. While political economy provides the setting in which the Kenyan media operates, cultural studies show how media content is not only shaped by the political and economic environments comprising those in power positions. Audiences are also actively engaged in the process of meaning construction. Considering Hall's (1977) encoding-decoding theory, the audiences can reject, negotiate or accept media content based on their own value systems and cultural orientation. Meaning, therefore, becomes a product of continual struggle between different discourses and power cannot be located in a top down manner as to who influences meaning as seen in a propaganda model. This is due to the fact that texts are diffused in different locations in society. The 2008 Kenya Communication Bill is utilised as an example to trace briefly the political and historical developments of policy issues that have influenced the Kenyan media. The Bill, furthermore, indicates how a weak socioeconomic , political and cultural environment is marred by ineffectual policies meant to safeguard and guarantee the freedom of the press as an extension of individual freedom of expression as enshrined in the Kenyan constitution. This weak policy context has ensured the Kenyan media remains subject to easy political manipulation and control. However, the paper concludes by showing how citizen journalism is growing out of a regulated mainstream media through internet technology.
Effects of media ownership, commercialization and commoditisation on editorial independence in Kenya
Media ownership will continue to present numerous challenges to editorial independence. Commercialisation, deregulation, internationalisation, media concentration, convergence and other profit-oriented trends are likely to widen the gap between what can be called the political logic and the media logic. All these trends contribute to the strengthening of the power of big corporate media and enable them to distance themselves from democratic power structures. It is most likely that those trend‐setting mass media become less interested in comprehensive information on policy processes and democracy. By this development, private commercial and international mass media organizations erode their relevance to the society that they are expected to serve. Thereby, a window of opportunity opens for public service media that are less exposed to these trends than private commercial mass media. Consequently, the relevance of public service media for the democratic process and the policy discourse increases. But there seems to be a silent but irreversible shift towards larger and more commercial media empires with increasing economic and even political clout. It is important to note that democratic societies require timely and relevant information, interest mediation and control. On the other Hand, mass media are obligated to contribute to these fundamental principles of democracy. Unfortunately, the larger and more commercial corporate media become, the less they are interested to enable and fulfill these essential democratic requirements. As Trappel (2008) puts, “democratic policy making requires specific forms of media coverage that is not offered by commercial transnational corporate media. Public service media are well placed to fill this important vacancy”. The media owner, in most cases, will strive to use media to project certain positions which protect their interests and generate more revenue while the editor will struggle to remain free from any stranglehold. Commercial media have to make profit to survive, and this often involves taking decisions which directly influence content such as cutting costs, closing down non-profit making media ventures, laying off staff, investing or not, and merging operations. Advertisers, regulators, business forces among other forces have continued to gang up to mould the media entities to become corporations. The society’s elite end up being media owners and consequently manipulate or control what comes out of their media empires and the adage ‘he who pays the piper calls the tune’ manifests itself in media ownership and editorial content. Consequently, media’s role as society’s watchdog is exchanged for that of wagging dog. This paper will attempt to provide a roadmap to this challenge by reviewing what other scholars have done and connecting the same with theories that anchor the same arguments.
The Moral Dilemmas of Journalism in Kenya's Politics of Belonging
This thesis explores the strategies pursued by Kenyan journalists as they contend with “the politics of belonging” in their work, arguing that the choices journalists make in the micro-processes of news production can be understood and guided from a moral perspective. The study addresses lingering questions about how journalists experience and respond to social divisions that can be created in the dynamic interaction between ethnic identity, personal networks and competitive party politics that characterizes a politics of belonging. Theoretically, it builds on an interpretation of Roger Silverstone’s normative theory of morality in the mediapolis and on the concepts of autonomy and agency developed within the sociology of journalism. A participatory and action-oriented methodology is employed to examine journalism practice: 10 journalists were engaged through a series of participatory workshops and interviews, and participant observation was undertaken through collaborations with these journalists on a variety of news experiments. Additional formal and informal interviews were conducted with other stakeholders who have an interest in news production. The thematic analysis of the resulting corpus of field notes and interview transcripts suggests that the Kenyan journalists who participated in the research experience the politics of belonging as a complex set of social pressures in their professional relationships, which create a series of challenges, trade-offs and dilemmas that they strategically negotiate in their daily practices and in the discourse of their news reports. The empirical analysis argues that the theoretical framing of journalism practice ― as envisaged by Francis Nyamnjoh and other scholars seeking to formulate African alternatives to Western traditions of journalism ― can be strengthened by integrating the concepts of journalistic autonomy and moral agency as developed in this thesis. The dissertation also offers insights into how such theoretical framings can be developed and implemented in the context of journalistic practice.
The general objective of the study was to find out factors underlying ethical considerations in the production of information and how the print mass media publish the information. This paper examines the extent to which ethical principles are considered in the process of productions of newspapers by Kenyan media houses. The study was guided by Roxborough's Principle of Ethics theory of 1979, which holds that communication should always be guided by ethical principles which he points out as the principle of social responsibility. Descriptive cross-sectional research design was used. Purposive sampling technique was used to select the target population who are the staff of one media houses. Systematic random sampling was then used to choose respondents from five departments whereby a sample size of 160 respondents were selected. Data was collected by the use of questionnaires where drop and pick method was used. The primary data collected was analyzed with the help of SPSS (Statistical Packages for Social Sciences) Program. The data collected was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The study established that editors focus on ethical issues such as unnamed sources; confidentiality; misrepresentation; obscenity, taste and tone in reporting; paying for news articles; plagiarism; discrimination; covering ethnic, religious and sectarian conflict; recording interviews and telephone conversations; privacy; intrusion into grief and shock; sex discrimination; financial journalism, protection of children; victims of sexual crimes; use of pictures and names; innocent relatives and friends; acts of violence; editor's responsibility, and advertisements. It was recommended that both the media houses and the public in Kenya should be sensitized on the complexities surrounding the concept of ethics in journalism.