DEMB Working Paper Series: a longitudinal analysis of issues, connections and impact of the discussion on technology and innovation policy at Oecd (original) (raw)
Related papers
The occasion of the 50th plenary meeting of the OECD Working Party on Innovation and Technology Policy (TIP) is being taken to elaborate a reflexive analysis of the WPTIP activity to ground a discussion for future activities, particularly in view of the discussion of the next budget plan and for a future mandate after that of 2014-2019. This analysis aims at providing an overview of the theories and analyses grounding the recommendations proposed by WPTIP on technology and innovation policy, in a period in which 'innovation' has become the catchword for any discussion on policies to support economic development and social inclusion. To place this analysis in a historical perspective, this paper adopts a systematic automatic text analysis to organize figures and facts over 25 years. The analysis considers text documents on WPTIP events (such as conferences, workshops, plenary meetings) and activities (such as reports on specific topics). Keywords: analysis of innovation policy, Oecd, WPTIP, organizational issues, textual analysis, similarity analysis, IRaMuTeQ, Taltac2 JEL classification: 03, 038, Z13
2019
An increasing consensus is shared among scholars on the relevance of policy mix in supporting innovation processes. An essential support for a comparative analysis of innovation policies is provided by STIP Compass. As a joint initiative of the European Commission and OECD, STIP Compass contains taxonomies of policies, databases, monitoring tools, and links between various data sources. The paper addresses two research questions: the first one concerns the way to single out a pattern of innovation policy mix. The second one specifically focuses on the dimensions in the narratives adopted to describe the current policy issues. The paper refers to the STIP Compass database downloaded on 24th August 2019. Results can be browsed by using the navigation on Tableau Public. Being aware that the potential of STIP Compass relies on the quality of information that is entered by the countries, this paper aims at enhancing the awareness of both scholars and policy makers involved in the innovation policy field by suggesting its use to outline patterns of policy mix across countries. Although the database is incomplete and currently under revision, the exercise undertaken in this paper outlines methods for text analysis that will be applied to the new updated edition of STIP Compass, when available. One urgent message is drawn from the analysis undertaken in this paper: aiming at providing an effective analytical framework a tools for innovation policies in Europe, the European Commission cannot overlook that subnational policies need to be entered in STIP Compass, and this could be done in a straightforward way, by using information on regional innovation policies already available in the DG Regio.
Promoting Policies that Make Innovation Benefit All: The OECD TIP Group @50
Innovation and development policy, 2019
The Conference TIP@50 commemorated the 50th meeting and the 25th Anniversary of the OECD Working Party on Innovation and Technology Policy (TIP). It was an exceptional occasion to take stock of achievements of the TIP since its creation in 1993 and to shape ideas on the future of innovation and technology policy. The following article summarises the main takeaways from the TIP@50 meeting:
Dilemmas of the Creation of Innovation Policy in Member States
Modern Management Review, 2018
Directions of changes occurring in the world economy in recent years show the transformation of the industrial economy into a knowledge-based economy, using the technological and innovative potential. This transformation has highlighted the competitive advantages of countries and regions specializing in the production of hightech products. A lot of research has been trying to find out what the drivers of innovation really are, though there has not formed one consensus. The aim of the paper is to investigate influence of research and development (R&D) expenditure on economic growth in EU member states and to assess whether there is a significant relationship between countries' R&D efforts and their innovation and between innovation and per capita income, as postulated by R&D based endogenous growth models. Basic source of data is Eurostat database and European Innovation Scoreboard reports. Results confirm positive and statistically significant impact of government R&D expenditure, which is the main driver for economic growth during the analysed period. Highly developed countries are conducting research to seek new sources of innovativeness and methods for creating innovative potential. The results also suggest that the EU countries that do not have effective R&D sectors seem to promote their innovation through technology spillovers from other countries.
The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to coordinate domestic and international policies.
Law and innovative society, 2022
The purpose of this article is to analyze the functioning of the multilateral projects of the «Horizon 2020» and «Horizon Europe» Programs, to establish the peculiarities of the status and activities of their subjects.To achieve the goal of the scientific work and solve the set tasks, a complex of general scientific and special research methods was used: the method of analysis and synthesis, alternatives, comparative studies, classification.Research on this issue allows us to state that despite the fact that multilateral Horizon 2020 projects constitute a significant part of EU project funding, scientific research on this issue is insufficient. This is partly due to the lack of a structured analytical approach of the subjects of this Framework Program. In particular, the legal status of the national Contact Point, which provides informational and methodical support for the thematic areas of research determined by the European Commission (EC) for the EU research and innovation program «Horizon Europe», remains overlooked.Within the framework of this study, the experience of Poland, where there is a Polish national Contact Point for EU research programs, was introduced.It was determined that at the micro-level of IS there is a Program «Horizon 2020» or «Horizon Europe», which can act as projects (a network of participants who cooperate within the framework of a joint innovation project both at the national level and at the EU level) and as Partners (organization, consisting of a network or group of persons, or an individual participant, who cooperate within the framework of a joint innovation project both at the national level and at the EU level) is a certain level of the very structure of a multi-level innovation system (or IS of a higher level). The authors propose to make changes to the Law of Ukraine on Scientific and Scientific-Technical activities. So, there is a proposal to add par. 3 to art. 66 regarding the status of a scientific institution that can act as a basic organization in which the national Contact Point of the European Union Framework Program for Research and Innovation «Horizon Europe» has been established.