“The Line of Beauty”: on Natural Forms and Abduction (original) (raw)
On Beauty There seems to be a relation or some sort of 'unity' between man's works and the spontaneously occurring works produced by nature such as shells, nests, horns and so on. To use Bertalanffy's term for describing common properties of objects or systems (1973), nature's forms and human forms are isomorphic. For example, efficient structures typical of shells or plants such as spirals and radii, are very common archetypes that recur throughout the whole body of humans' architecture. A spiral form can be easily found in the design of the pavement of a square, the staircase of a building or the cupola of a church, while plant's radiated structures have been beautifully utilised in Gothic architecture in the form of fan vaults. Therefore a certain relation between natural and human models appears evident. But one may easily argue on the legitimacy of hypothesising this very relation. How does such visible evidence entails 'truth' or, generally, a true causal relation? This question immediately raises another one: until what extent should we trust our senses – in this specific case, sight- and, more in general, what type of knowledge do perceptions provide? In the aesthetic framework provided by the discussion on the relation between human and natural forms, this paper proposes a synthetic treatment of inferential methods, with emphasis on abduction. Being the only method of scientific enquiry that takes in serious consideration the fallible-but-creative knowledge-generation potential of perceptions, abduction allows to argue not only that there is a necessary link between human and natural forms, but that this link is indeed is causal. In other words, human aesthetics is profoundly and primarily shaped by natural evolution.
Sign up to get access to over 50M papers
Related papers
Natural Architecture and constructed forms: structure and surfaces from idea to drawing
Nexus Network Journal, 2006
This work cames from didactic experience in architecture classes in both university of Florence and Parma. Geometric scheme comprehension, in natural regular object, was the basis of drawing and scientific rapresentation lerning, such as architectural formal synthesis. This exercise may offer also a valid starting point to approach students to mathematics, and help them imaging and planing about always more complexe surfaces of late contemporary architecture. Architecture origin is abscribed to Natur imitation, offering in its objects living models for structural, formal and aesthetic problems. Relationship between natural and artificial architectures trought geometry controlled parts composition and/or forms growth, underlines the concreteness of this classical myth. Indeed observations of Natur’s patterns and formal phenomenous –on which classic thought and western science are based – offers solution to several project requirements, such as the serch of albertian concinnitas, finding satisfation in the composition armony components, specificable by forms and numbers (geometry and aritmetic). Imitating organic forms and structures, architecture explains its strong relationship with primary geometry elements: numeric sequences, contolled by neat laws, characterise either building of creation or design. Formal architectural archetypes, in static structures such as in surfaces patterns, are based on simple geometric scheme, easily connected with naturals models: - modular aggregation (grid patterns) - unity division (circle and polygons) - continuous growth (spirals). So geometry referenses are the first project means to concretise Idea to Design. They are able to fulfil several architecture requirement, such as Vitruvio’s concept of firmitas, utilitas, venustas. Comparing wonderful variety of Nature’s objects with their built imitation, we find confirmation and new project stimulus. References 1 Villard de Honnercourt, Disegni, Jaka Book, Milano, 1988. 4 Ian Stewart, What shape is a snowflake?, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 2001. 5 Luca Pacioli, De divina proportione, Venezia 1494. 6 Gottfried Semper, Der Stil, München, 1860-63. 7 Ernst Gömbrich, The sense of order,1979. 8 Paolo Portoghesi, Natura e Architettura, Fabbri Editori, Milano, 1993. 9 D’Arcy W. Thomson, On Growth and Form, Abridged Edition, Cambridge, 1961. 10 Mario Livio, The golden ratio, Broadway, 2002. 11 pictures 9-10-11 cames from his work.. 12 M.C. Escher, His life and concrete graphic work, Abradale, New York, 1982.
Representations, 2020
Arguing that aesthetic preference generates the historical forms of human racial and gender difference in The Descent of Man, Charles Darwin offers an alternative account of aesthetic autonomy to the Kantian or idealist account. Darwin understands the aesthetic sense to be constitutive of scientific knowledge insofar as scientific knowledge entails the natural historian’s fine discrimination of formal differences and their dynamic interrelations within a unified system. Natural selection itself works this way, Darwin argues in The Origin of Species; in The Descent of Man he makes the case for the natural basis of the aesthetic while relativizing particular aesthetic judgments. Libidinally charged—in Kantian phrase, “interested”—the aesthetic sense nevertheless comes historically adrift from its functional origin in rites of courtship.
Drawing the indiscernible: morphogenesis & morphography of the artefacts
Le ragioni del disegno: pensiero, forma e modello nella gestione della complessità, Gangemi editore - ISBN 978-88-492-3295-0, 2016
Based on the assumption that “Drawing” aims at providing the most effective expression of the figural geometry of visual, natural or artificial objects, this paper proposes to analyse two branches of the discipline: 1) a notion of “figural geometry” of the bodies consisting of a “figurative” (iconic and analogical) and a “plastic” (mereological and gestaltic) component; 2) new “form” (eidetic) categories more suitable for the comprehension of the main aesthetic artefacts – from city to decoration – resulting from some morphogenetic models, especially those developed by Turing and Thom.
The Aesthetics of Structure
The definition of structure as a separate discipline in the history of architecture is relatively recent, about 150 years ago. Before that time the aesthetic roles of architecture and structure were indistinguishable and consequently the “aesthetic of structure” does not have any definite meaning. In the complicated art of constructing the structure has always used as a potential aesthetic instrument. Architecture in general despite structure, has too many other aesthetic instruments like colour, light, decoration, geometric proportions, form etc. But the structure or the load-bearing part of the building has a crucial aesthetic role because during the cognitive process it exerts a direct psychological impact to the viewer while the structural impression may affect the human “survival instinct”. In a certain way the perception of structure represents the state of health of the building. A seemingly vigorous structure may result more comfortable. In 2009 Mr. Denis Dutton presented his theory of evolutionary aesthetic. According to that theory our sense of beauty is related to our primordial instinct of survival and he explains meticulously the way how this works. In fact the essence of Dutton's theory is a simple and short conclusion; deep in our mind the healthy and the beauty are the same thing. Inducting this short conclusion to the case of structural aesthetic in this thesis is made a research to find a relationship between various type of structures and how they reflect their healthy and how their healthy is “converted” in Beauty. The examples presented are rated in ascending order beginning with some random cases and positioning the best ones in the end of the study material. In the end the research is synthesized in a three dimensional graphic chart where the conclusions are combined with the progressive positive proprieties of each case. In conclusion the structure not only has a specific aesthetic charge but relating the aesthetic of structure to its psychological impact upraises the structure to the top of architectural aesthetic instruments.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.