Are Assets Fungible? Testing the Behavioral Theory of Life-Cycle Savings (original) (raw)
1998
This paper is an empirical investigation of the behavioral life-cycle savings model. This model posits that self-control problems causes individuals to depart substantially from rational behavior. I show that this model can explain how the consumption of individuals at or near retirement vary with changes in different types of financial assets. Specifically, consumption spending is sensitive to changes in income and in liquid assets, but not very sensitive to changes in the value of other types of assets such as houses and social security (even though the value of non-liquid assets is relatively large for most of the households in the sample). In general, the evidence presented here favors the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model over the conventional life-cycle model even when liquidity
Related papers
The Life-Cycle Model of Consumption and Saving
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2001
A central implication of life-cycle models is that agents smooth consumption. We review the empirical evidence on smoothing at frequencies from within the year up to across a lifetime. We find that life-cycle models--particular those which incorporate realistic features of markets and goods--have more empirical successes than failures. We also show that some apparent deviations from theoretical predictions imply very small welfare losses for agents. Finally, we emphasize that the coherence of life-cycle models imposes an important discipline when incorporating new features into models.
2007
Intertemporal preferences are di ¢ cult to measure. In this paper we attempt to estimate time preferences using a structural bu¤er stock consumption model and the Method of Simu-lated Moments. The model includes stochastic labor income, liquidity constraints, child and adult dependents, liquid and illiquid assets, revolving credit, retirement, and discount functions that allow short-run and long-run discount rates to di¤er. Field data on retirement wealth accumulation, credit card borrowing, and consumption-income comovement identify the model. Our benchmark estimates imply a 40 % short-term annualized discount rate and a 4.3 % long-term annualized discount rate. All speci cations reject the restriction to a constant discount rate. Our quantitative results are sensitive to assumptions about the return on illiquid assets and the coe ¢ cient of relative risk aversion.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.