Lion (Panthera leo) ecology and livestock conflicts in Waza National Park, Cameroon (original) (raw)

Abstract

Demography and ecology were studied of a decreased lion population in Waza National Park, Cameroon Home ranges of lions were large with an average of 1043 (MCP 100%) or 635 (HM 95%). Lions spent most of their time inside the park, especially in the hot dry season. Time spent outside the park increases in the wet season and peaks in the cold dry season. Lions were most active during the night with crepuscular peaks around sunrise and sunset and reduced activity during the hottest parts of the day. This nocturnal activity increases when lions were outside the park. Lions were least active in the cold dry season compared to the hot dry and the wet season. Transects showed an increasing number and congregation of wild ungulates on the floodplain in time with most of the observed lions in the vicinity of these congregations. Number of nights present at a GPS cluster presented the best model to predict whether or not a lion had killed or scavenged an animal successfully. Lions killed or s...

Figures (41)

Lion (Panthera leo) ecology and livestock conflicts in Waza National Park, Cameroon

Lion (Panthera leo) ecology and livestock conflicts in Waza National Park, Cameroon

- Centre d’Etude de l’Environnement et du Développement au Cameroun (CEDC)  Environment and Development Student Report no. ?  Department Environment and Development, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University

- Centre d’Etude de l’Environnement et du Développement au Cameroun (CEDC) Environment and Development Student Report no. ? Department Environment and Development, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University

In 1968, when the Waza National Park in North Cameroon was given its status, the local human population was forced to move out of the park, after which most of the local communities settled just outside the park boundaries. The different communities are engaged in different activities such as small-scale agriculture, fishing and cattle breeding. Cattle usually graze around the boundaries of the park area, but sometimes cattle are also found grazing inside the park. Livestock predation, both inside and outside the park occurs mainly by hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) and lions, causing conflicts with the livestock owners.  Herbivore numbers in Waza National Park also dropped dramatically since the last decades (longh et al., 2004). Numbers of kob (Kobus kob kob), topi (Damaliscus lunatus korrigum) and roan antelope (Hippotragus equines) dropped from respectively 20,000, 20,000 and 2,000 in the 1960s and 1970s to respectively 8,929, 1,512 and 496 in 2000 and to resp.1,562, 848 and 150 in 2007 (Table 1, Iongh et al., 2004; Scholte et al., 2007;Omondi et al., 2007). This drop is due to the construction of the Maga dam upstream in 1979, due to poaching, and due to  antelope livestock interactions, provoking diseases such as rinderpest (Scholte et al, 2007). This drop might explain the large average home range size of 630 km? (MCP100%) for lions in Waza National Park found in 2000 by (Bauer & Iongh, 2005). These authors also revealed that lions have different home ranges in the wet- and dry season. During the dry season, lions stayed well inside the park boundaries while in the wet season they went outside the park. However, their study had focused on woodland lions and not on the lions living on the  floodplain

In 1968, when the Waza National Park in North Cameroon was given its status, the local human population was forced to move out of the park, after which most of the local communities settled just outside the park boundaries. The different communities are engaged in different activities such as small-scale agriculture, fishing and cattle breeding. Cattle usually graze around the boundaries of the park area, but sometimes cattle are also found grazing inside the park. Livestock predation, both inside and outside the park occurs mainly by hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) and lions, causing conflicts with the livestock owners. Herbivore numbers in Waza National Park also dropped dramatically since the last decades (longh et al., 2004). Numbers of kob (Kobus kob kob), topi (Damaliscus lunatus korrigum) and roan antelope (Hippotragus equines) dropped from respectively 20,000, 20,000 and 2,000 in the 1960s and 1970s to respectively 8,929, 1,512 and 496 in 2000 and to resp.1,562, 848 and 150 in 2007 (Table 1, Iongh et al., 2004; Scholte et al., 2007;Omondi et al., 2007). This drop is due to the construction of the Maga dam upstream in 1979, due to poaching, and due to antelope livestock interactions, provoking diseases such as rinderpest (Scholte et al, 2007). This drop might explain the large average home range size of 630 km? (MCP100%) for lions in Waza National Park found in 2000 by (Bauer & Iongh, 2005). These authors also revealed that lions have different home ranges in the wet- and dry season. During the dry season, lions stayed well inside the park boundaries while in the wet season they went outside the park. However, their study had focused on woodland lions and not on the lions living on the floodplain

livestock attacks at the arrival of the wildebeest migration in the Maasai Mara National Reserve. Patterson et al (2004) as Woodroffe & Frank (2005) both suggest that the increase of livestock depredation in the wet season is up hand when native prey is inaccessible in and around respectively Tsavo National Park and the Laikipia district. Hemson (2003) found that lions in the Makgadikgadi National Park, Botswana increase the frequency with which they killed livestock during periods of low natural prey availability. However, when migratory wild prey moved away, lions killed resident wild prey more frequently than livestock despite livestock being most abundant. This suggests that lions may outweigh the costs, risks of being killed. bv the benefits. an easv meal.   Home range is main  y influenced by prey and  water availability (Gittleman & Harvey, 1982; Van  Orsdol et al., 1985; Vilj which in — is correla soil nutrient status and minimum home range  oen, 1993; Adams, 2001) ed with a combination of rainfall (East, 1984). The size is determined by  seasonal periods of food shortage (Van Orsdol et al., 1985). When food is not available, lions increase their home range in order to find prey animals. On the other hand, when prey is abundant, he home range decreases, holding the same biomass as during times of scarcity. Hemson (2003) found an exponential relationship for lean season prey biomass and lion home ranges, which provides strong evidence for the dependency of lion home range on prey availability. However, Nijhawan 2008) found that one male in Chobe National Park, Botswana had a home range of 2151.7 km? MCP100%) while there is a high prey density in hat area.

livestock attacks at the arrival of the wildebeest migration in the Maasai Mara National Reserve. Patterson et al (2004) as Woodroffe & Frank (2005) both suggest that the increase of livestock depredation in the wet season is up hand when native prey is inaccessible in and around respectively Tsavo National Park and the Laikipia district. Hemson (2003) found that lions in the Makgadikgadi National Park, Botswana increase the frequency with which they killed livestock during periods of low natural prey availability. However, when migratory wild prey moved away, lions killed resident wild prey more frequently than livestock despite livestock being most abundant. This suggests that lions may outweigh the costs, risks of being killed. bv the benefits. an easv meal. Home range is main y influenced by prey and water availability (Gittleman & Harvey, 1982; Van Orsdol et al., 1985; Vilj which in — is correla soil nutrient status and minimum home range oen, 1993; Adams, 2001) ed with a combination of rainfall (East, 1984). The size is determined by seasonal periods of food shortage (Van Orsdol et al., 1985). When food is not available, lions increase their home range in order to find prey animals. On the other hand, when prey is abundant, he home range decreases, holding the same biomass as during times of scarcity. Hemson (2003) found an exponential relationship for lean season prey biomass and lion home ranges, which provides strong evidence for the dependency of lion home range on prey availability. However, Nijhawan 2008) found that one male in Chobe National Park, Botswana had a home range of 2151.7 km? MCP100%) while there is a high prey density in hat area.

Fig 1 Map of Waza National Park.

Fig 1 Map of Waza National Park.

Table 3 Ecological data for all four collared lions   MCP, minimum convex polygon; HM, harmonic mean; home range data in km”; temperature in degrees Celsius; * mean based on 4 lions, note the smaller data set of L2 and L3; ° mean based on three lions, virtually no data of  L2 and L3 of the cold dry season, L3’s collar failed at 25" at September 2007; +, L1 and L2 were both killed by locals after stock-raiding..

Table 3 Ecological data for all four collared lions MCP, minimum convex polygon; HM, harmonic mean; home range data in km”; temperature in degrees Celsius; * mean based on 4 lions, note the smaller data set of L2 and L3; ° mean based on three lions, virtually no data of L2 and L3 of the cold dry season, L3’s collar failed at 25" at September 2007; +, L1 and L2 were both killed by locals after stock-raiding..

Fig 2 Home range size calculated with a Kernel test (H=0.018); HM (95%, 50 and 5%).

Fig 2 Home range size calculated with a Kernel test (H=0.018); HM (95%, 50 and 5%).

Fig 3 Seasonal variation in the amount of time spend outside the park.

Fig 3 Seasonal variation in the amount of time spend outside the park.

Lions were most active during the night with crepuscular peaks around sunrise and sunset and  Fig 4 Mean activity pattern and temperature throughout the day (n=4). Average distance between GPS fixes resembles the activity pattern.

Lions were most active during the night with crepuscular peaks around sunrise and sunset and Fig 4 Mean activity pattern and temperature throughout the day (n=4). Average distance between GPS fixes resembles the activity pattern.

Fig 5 Seasonal variation in the amount of metres walked a day.  Lions were active for 23.61% of the day, of which 81.46% was nocturnal activity. Males were more active (24.22%) than females (23%; Z=-8.728, P<0.001) and had a higher nocturnal activity (85.79%) than females (77.14%; Z=-12.730, P<0.001). Lions were significantly less active in the cold dry season than in the hot dry season and the wet season (d.f. 2, P<0.001). Outside the park, lions had a higher nocturnal activity (83.58%) than inside the park (79.34%; Z=-4.236, P<0.001). Floodplain lions (L2, L3 and L4) had a significantly higher

Fig 5 Seasonal variation in the amount of metres walked a day. Lions were active for 23.61% of the day, of which 81.46% was nocturnal activity. Males were more active (24.22%) than females (23%; Z=-8.728, P<0.001) and had a higher nocturnal activity (85.79%) than females (77.14%; Z=-12.730, P<0.001). Lions were significantly less active in the cold dry season than in the hot dry season and the wet season (d.f. 2, P<0.001). Outside the park, lions had a higher nocturnal activity (83.58%) than inside the park (79.34%; Z=-4.236, P<0.001). Floodplain lions (L2, L3 and L4) had a significantly higher

Table 4 Numbers and percentages of GPS-clusters which were selected, visited and were carcasses were found   Topi, Gazelle, Warthog, Elephant, Marabou Stork, Monitor Lizard, Cattle, Donkey and Sheep. The percentage of calves and sub adults found was 25.2%. Figure 8 shows the percentages of wild herbivores and livestock killed/scavenged by L1 and L2. Differences in killing percentages were significant for L1 (9°=21.844, d.f. 10, P=0.016) and for L2 (7°=21.003, d.f. 5, P<0.001). L1 preyed most upon cattle, roan antelopes and giraffes; where as L.2 preyed most upon kob, cattle and giraffes. Lions killed more wild ungulates (73%) than livestock 27%; Z=-5.519, P<0.001). Of the livestock killed by lions, 84% was cattle, 11% donkey and 5% sheep. Lions preferred all wild herbivores above ivestock. Of the wild herbivores lion preferred warthog, gazelle and roan antelope the most (Table 5). The average body mass of preferred prey species was 271 kg.

Table 4 Numbers and percentages of GPS-clusters which were selected, visited and were carcasses were found Topi, Gazelle, Warthog, Elephant, Marabou Stork, Monitor Lizard, Cattle, Donkey and Sheep. The percentage of calves and sub adults found was 25.2%. Figure 8 shows the percentages of wild herbivores and livestock killed/scavenged by L1 and L2. Differences in killing percentages were significant for L1 (9°=21.844, d.f. 10, P=0.016) and for L2 (7°=21.003, d.f. 5, P<0.001). L1 preyed most upon cattle, roan antelopes and giraffes; where as L.2 preyed most upon kob, cattle and giraffes. Lions killed more wild ungulates (73%) than livestock 27%; Z=-5.519, P<0.001). Of the livestock killed by lions, 84% was cattle, 11% donkey and 5% sheep. Lions preferred all wild herbivores above ivestock. Of the wild herbivores lion preferred warthog, gazelle and roan antelope the most (Table 5). The average body mass of preferred prey species was 271 kg.

Fig 6 & 7 Herbivore number in time; herbivore congregation in time. The numbers of the largest herd during each transect are shown.

Fig 6 & 7 Herbivore number in time; herbivore congregation in time. The numbers of the largest herd during each transect are shown.

Table 5 Total kills recorded for L1 and L2, total number of prey species in and on the border of Waza N.P., body mass (mean female body mass), 4 of mean female body mass, percentage that each species comprised of the total kills recorded (67),  percentage availability of each species, Jacob’s index values. Three species, donkey, marabou stork and monitor lizard were left out the analysis as no availability numbers were available.

Table 5 Total kills recorded for L1 and L2, total number of prey species in and on the border of Waza N.P., body mass (mean female body mass), 4 of mean female body mass, percentage that each species comprised of the total kills recorded (67), percentage availability of each species, Jacob’s index values. Three species, donkey, marabou stork and monitor lizard were left out the analysis as no availability numbers were available.

Fig 8 Killing/scavenging percentages of L1 and L2.

Fig 8 Killing/scavenging percentages of L1 and L2.

Fig 9 Numbers of prey killed by L1 and L2 in different habitats.  Lions killed prey in all different habitats. Almost all livestock was killed in the woodland zone (95%). Most kobs were killed on the floodplain (75%).L1 killed significantly more prey in the woodland zone than in the acacia zone and the floodplain (df. 2,

Fig 9 Numbers of prey killed by L1 and L2 in different habitats. Lions killed prey in all different habitats. Almost all livestock was killed in the woodland zone (95%). Most kobs were killed on the floodplain (75%).L1 killed significantly more prey in the woodland zone than in the acacia zone and the floodplain (df. 2,

followed by the wet season and most livestock ki  occurred in the cold dry season, although not significantly (Fig. 12, df. 2, P=0.822)  In absolute number, most livestock kills occurred ii the wet season (Fig. 11). Relatively, the hot dry season has the lowest number of livestock kills,  Fig 11 & 12 Number of prey killed throughout the year; number of livestock killed throughout the year (hot dry season, N=2; wet season, N=12; cold dry season, N=5).

followed by the wet season and most livestock ki occurred in the cold dry season, although not significantly (Fig. 12, df. 2, P=0.822) In absolute number, most livestock kills occurred ii the wet season (Fig. 11). Relatively, the hot dry season has the lowest number of livestock kills, Fig 11 & 12 Number of prey killed throughout the year; number of livestock killed throughout the year (hot dry season, N=2; wet season, N=12; cold dry season, N=5).

Fig 10 Numbers of wild prey and livestock killed at different times of the day.

Fig 10 Numbers of wild prey and livestock killed at different times of the day.

Table 7 Overview of the home ranges of Waza NP and Bénoué NP. Data of Bauer & de Jongh 2005 was from the year 200(  and from the period 1999-2001. Data of de Iongh (unpublished data) was from November 2007-July 2008. * Minimun Convex Polygon based on 4-hour selection decreasing home range size with 2-3%.   Home range is mainly influenced by prey and water availability (Gittkeman & Harvey, 1982; Van  Orsdol et al., 1985; Viljoen, 1993, Adams, 200  declining over the last decades. De Iongh et 2004) reported an estimated prey density of 632  ike giraffe and elephant (including cattle 3872  Prey density in Waza National Park has been  km” in 1998. Later, Bauer (2008) reported a prey density of 274 kg km”, excluding mega herbivores  iF  al Kg  Kg  km”). The WWE air count reported by Omondi et  al (2007) resulted in a prey density of 142 kg km™ excluding mega herbivores, 844 kg km” including mega herbivores and 4233 kg km” including cattle. Predator biomass also decreased from 8.3 kg/ km™  in 1998 (Iongh et al, 2004) to 4.5 km™ in 2008. Predator and prey decrease resulted in a lower amount kg prey per kg predator/ km. With a lion population size estimate of maximum 25 lions (this study) and a hyena population size estimate of 100 hyenas (Bauer et al, 2008), the amount kg prey per kg predator/ km™ dropped from 76 in 1998 to 31 in 2008. These numbers suggest a large decrease of wild ungulates against a strong increase of cattle numbers. This decrease in wild prey might well explain the large home ranges found in this study.

Table 7 Overview of the home ranges of Waza NP and Bénoué NP. Data of Bauer & de Jongh 2005 was from the year 200( and from the period 1999-2001. Data of de Iongh (unpublished data) was from November 2007-July 2008. * Minimun Convex Polygon based on 4-hour selection decreasing home range size with 2-3%. Home range is mainly influenced by prey and water availability (Gittkeman & Harvey, 1982; Van Orsdol et al., 1985; Viljoen, 1993, Adams, 200 declining over the last decades. De Iongh et 2004) reported an estimated prey density of 632 ike giraffe and elephant (including cattle 3872 Prey density in Waza National Park has been km” in 1998. Later, Bauer (2008) reported a prey density of 274 kg km”, excluding mega herbivores iF al Kg Kg km”). The WWE air count reported by Omondi et al (2007) resulted in a prey density of 142 kg km™ excluding mega herbivores, 844 kg km” including mega herbivores and 4233 kg km” including cattle. Predator biomass also decreased from 8.3 kg/ km™ in 1998 (Iongh et al, 2004) to 4.5 km™ in 2008. Predator and prey decrease resulted in a lower amount kg prey per kg predator/ km. With a lion population size estimate of maximum 25 lions (this study) and a hyena population size estimate of 100 hyenas (Bauer et al, 2008), the amount kg prey per kg predator/ km™ dropped from 76 in 1998 to 31 in 2008. These numbers suggest a large decrease of wild ungulates against a strong increase of cattle numbers. This decrease in wild prey might well explain the large home ranges found in this study.

Table 8 Percentages of prey killed/scavenged by lions body mass classes based on average female body weight * Total percentage of determined lion prey is 104.8%.

Table 8 Percentages of prey killed/scavenged by lions body mass classes based on average female body weight * Total percentage of determined lion prey is 104.8%.

Table 1 Herbivore numbers in time  Table 2 Home range sizes of various studies in various regions. Home ranges are given in km’.

Table 1 Herbivore numbers in time Table 2 Home range sizes of various studies in various regions. Home ranges are given in km’.

Table 3 Ecological data for all four collared lions

Table 3 Ecological data for all four collared lions

MCP, minimum convex polygon; HM, harmonic mean; home range data in km”; temperature in degrees Celsius;  * mean based on 4 lions, note the smaller data set of L2 and L3; ° mean based on three lions, virtually no data of

MCP, minimum convex polygon; HM, harmonic mean; home range data in km”; temperature in degrees Celsius; * mean based on 4 lions, note the smaller data set of L2 and L3; ° mean based on three lions, virtually no data of

Table 4 Numbers and percentages of GPS-clusters which were selected, visited and were carcasses were found  Table 5 Total kills recorded for L1 and L2, total number of prey species in and on the border of Waza N.P.,

Table 4 Numbers and percentages of GPS-clusters which were selected, visited and were carcasses were found Table 5 Total kills recorded for L1 and L2, total number of prey species in and on the border of Waza N.P.,

marabou stork and monitor lizard were left out the analysis as no availability numbers were available.

marabou stork and monitor lizard were left out the analysis as no availability numbers were available.

Table 6 Numbers and percentages of lion kills inside and outside the park during day and night

Table 6 Numbers and percentages of lion kills inside and outside the park during day and night

Table 7 Overview of the home ranges of Waza NP and Bénoué NP. Data of Bauer & de Iongh 2005 was from

Table 7 Overview of the home ranges of Waza NP and Bénoué NP. Data of Bauer & de Iongh 2005 was from

July 2008. “Minimum Convex Polygon based on 4-hour selection decreasing home range size with 2-3%.  Table 8 Percentages of prey killed/scavenged by lions body mass classes based on average female body weight

July 2008. “Minimum Convex Polygon based on 4-hour selection decreasing home range size with 2-3%. Table 8 Percentages of prey killed/scavenged by lions body mass classes based on average female body weight

“ Total percentage of determined lion prey is 104.8%.

“ Total percentage of determined lion prey is 104.8%.

Giraffe, adult

Giraffe, adult

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (152)

  1. ADAMS, E. S. (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 32, 277-303.
  2. ANDERSON, C. R. & LINDZEY, F. G. (2003) Estimating cougar predation rates from GPS location clusters. The Journal of wildlife management, 67, 307-316.
  3. BAUER, H. (2003) Lion conservation in West and Central Africa: the case of Waza National Park, Cameroon, Thesis (PhD), Leiden University, Leiden. BAUER, H., DE IONGH, H. H., PRINCEE, F. P. G. & NGANTOU, D. (2003) Research needs for lion conservation in West and Central Africa. Comptes rendus. Biologies, 326, S112-S118.
  4. BAUER, H. & IONGH, H. H. (2005) Lion (Panthera leo) home ranges and livestock conflicts in Waza National Park, Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 43, 208-214.
  5. BAUER, H. & KARI, S. (2001) Assessment of the human-predator conflict with thematic PRA around Waza NP. PLA notes, 41, 9-13.
  6. BAUER, H. & NOWELL, K. (2004) West African lion population classified as regionally Endangered. . CAT News, 41, 35-36.
  7. BAUER, H. & VAN DER MERWE, S. (2004) Inventory of free-ranging lions Panthera leo in Africa. Oryx, 38, 26-31.
  8. BAUER, H., VANHERLE, N., DI SILVESTRE, I. & DE IONGH, H. H. (2008) Lion -prey relations in West and Central Africa. Mammalian Biology, 73, 70-73.
  9. BREUER, T. (2005) Diet choice of large carnivores in northern Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 43, 181-190.
  10. BURT, W. H. (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 346-352.
  11. BUTLER, J. R. A. (2000) The economic costs of wildlife predation on livestock in Gokwe communal land, Zimbabwe. African journal of ecology, 38, 23-30.
  12. CHARDONNET, P. (2002) Conservation of the African Lion: Contribution to a Status Survey, International Foundation for the Conservation of Wildlife, France & Conservation Force, USA.
  13. EAST, R. (1984) Rainfall, Soil Nutrient Status and Biomass of Large African Savannah Mammals. African journal of ecology, 22, 245-270.
  14. ESRI (1992) Arcview 3.2, Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.
  15. FLIZOT, P. (1962) The Waza National Park in Northern Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 16, 293-297.
  16. FOBUZIE, P. T., CROES, B. M., BUIJ, R. & IONGH, H. H. (2007) Lion collaring operation in Waza National Park, Far North Province, Cameroon, May 5 -May 10, 2007, Unpublished.
  17. FRANK, L. G. (1998) Living with lions: carnivore conservation and livestock in Laikipia District, Kenya, DAI for United States AID Bethesda.
  18. FRANK, L. G., WOODROFFE, R. & OGADA, M. O. (2005) People and predators in Laikipia District, Kenya In: People and wildlife-conflict or coexistence. Cambridge University Press.
  19. FRANKE, A., CAELLI, T., KUZYK, G. & HUDSON, R. J. (2006) Prediction of wolf (Canis lupus) kill-sites using hidden Markov models. Ecological modelling, 197, 237-232.
  20. FUNSTON, P. (2001) Kalahari Transfrontier Lion Project: Final Report. Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa.
  21. FUNSTON, P. J., MILLS, M. G. L., BIGGS, H. C. & RICHARDSON, P. R. K. (1998) Hunting by male lions: ecological influences and socioecological implications. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1333-1345.
  22. GITTLEMAN, J. L. & HARVEY, P. H. (1982) Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behavioural ecology and sociobiology, 10, 57-63.
  23. HAYWARD, M. W. & HAYWARD, G. J. (2007) Activity patterns of reintroduced lion Panthera leo and spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta in the Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa. African journal of ecology, 45, 135-141.
  24. HAYWARD, M. W. & KERLEY, G. I. H. (2005) Prey preferences of the lion (Panthera leo). Journal of zoology, 267, 309-322.
  25. HEMSON, G. (2003) The ecology and conservation of lions: human-wildlife conflict in semi-arid Botswana., Thesis (PhD), University of Oxford, Oxford. HOLMERN, T., NYAHONGO, J. & ROSKAFT, E. (2007) Livestock loss caused by predators outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biological conservation, 135, 518-526.
  26. HOPCRAFT, J. G. C., SINCLAIR, A. R. E. & PACKER, C. (2005) Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 559-566.
  27. HOSMER, D. W. & LEMESHOW, S. (1989) Applied logistic regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  28. HUNTER, L. T. B. (1998) The behavioural ecology of reintroduced lions and cheetahs in the Phinda Resource Reserve, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa, Thesis (PhD), University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
  29. IKANDA, D. K. (2005) A study of the spatial dynamics and human interactions of African lions Panthera leo in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania, Thesis (MSc), University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam.
  30. IONGH, H. H. & BAUER, H. (2008) Ten years of ecological research on lions in Waza National Park, Northern Cameroon. CAT News, 48, 29- 32. IONGH, H. H., BAUER, H. & HAMLING, P. (2004) Nine years of research on a lion (Panthera leo) population in the Waza National Park (Cameroon): a review. Game and Wildlife Science, 21, 433-446.
  31. JACOBS, J. (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection, a modification of the Forage Ratio and Ivlev's Electivity Index. Oecologia, 14, 413-417.
  32. KARANI, I. W. (1994) An assessment of depredation by lions and other predators in the group ranches adjacent to Masai Mara National reserve, Department of Wildlife Management, Moi University.
  33. KINGDON, J. (1997) The Kingdon field guide to African mammals, Academic Press, London.
  34. KOLOWSKI, J. M. & HOLEKAMP, K. E. (2006) Spatial, temporal, and physical characteristics of livestock depredations by large carnivores along a Kenyan reserve border. Biological conservation, 128, 529-541.
  35. KRUUK, H. (1980) The effects of large carnivores on livestock and animal husbandry in Marsabit District, Kenya, United Nations Environment Program-Man and Biosphere Program (UNEP- MAB), Nairobi.
  36. MERIGGI, A. & LOVARI, S. (1996) A review of wolf predation in southern Europe: Does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? The Journal of applied ecology, 33, 1561-1571.
  37. MILLS, M. G. L. (1992) Conservation management of large carnivores in Africa. Koedoe, 34, 81- 90. MILLS, M. G. L. & BIGGS, H. C. (1993) Prey apportionment and related ecological relationships between large carnivores in Kruger National Park. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 253-268.
  38. MISHRA, C. (1997) Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environmental conservation, 24, 338-343.
  39. NIJHAWAN, S. (2008) Understanding human- large carnivore conflict in Chobe, Botswana, Thesis (MSc), Duke University, Durham.
  40. NOWELL, K. & JACKSON, P. (1996) Wild Cats Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, IUCN/SCC/Cat Specialist group, Gland.
  41. O'CONNELL-RODWELL, C. E., RODWELL, T., RICE, M. & HART, L. A. (2000) Living with the modern conservation paradigm: Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East Caprivi, Namibia. Biological conservation, 93, 381-392.
  42. OGADA, M. O., WOODROFFE, R., OGUGE, N. O. & FRANK, L. G. (2003) Limiting depredation by African carnivores: the role of livestock husbandry. Conservation biology, 17, 1521-1530.
  43. OMONDI, P., MAYIENDA, R. & TCHAMBA, M. (2007) Total aerial count of elephants, giraffes, roan antelopes and other wildlife species and ostrich in Waza National Park, Cameroon, WWF-Central Africa Regional Office, Yaoundé. OWEN-SMITH, N. & MILLS, M. G. L. (2008) Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web. The Journal of animal ecology, 77, 173-183.
  44. PATTERSON, B. D., KASIKI, S. M., SELEMPO, E. & KAYS, R. W. (2004) Livestock predation by lions (Panthera leo) and other carnivores on ranches neighbouring Tsavo National Parks, Kenya. Biological conservation, 119, 507-516.
  45. POLISAR, J., MAXIT, I., SCOGNAMILLO, D., FARRELL, L., SUNQUIST, M. E. & EISENBERG, J. F. (2003) Jaguars, pumas, their prey base, and cattle ranching: ecological interpretations of a management problem. Biological conservation, 109, 297-310.
  46. RADLOFF, F. G. T. & DU TOIT, J. T. (2004) Large predators and their prey in a southern African savannah: a predator's size determines its prey size range. The Journal of animal ecology, 73, 410-423.
  47. RUDNAI, J. (1979) Ecology of lions in Nairobi National Park and the adjoining Kitengela- Conservation-Unit in Kenya. African journal of ecology, 17, 85-95.
  48. SAND, H., ZIMMERMANN, B., WABAKKEN, P., ANDRÈN, H. & PEDERSEN, H. C. (2005) Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf-ungulate ecosystems. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33, 914- 925. SCHALLER, G. B. (1972) The Serengeti lion: a study of predator-prey relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  49. SCHEEL, D. (1993) Profitability, encounter rates, and prey choice of African lions. Behavioural Ecology, 4, 90-97.
  50. SCHOLTE, P., ADAM, S. & SERGE, B. K. (2007) Population trends of antelopes in Waza National Park (Cameroon) from 1960 to 2001: the interacting effects of rainfall, flooding and human interventions. African journal of ecology, 45, 431-439.
  51. SCHOLTE, P., DE KORT, S. & VAN WEERD, M. (1999) The birds of the Waza-Logone area, Far North Province, Cameroon. Malimbus, 21, 16- 49. SCHULTZ, P. & TURK, R. (2002) Population ecology of the lion (Panthera leo) in Waza National Park, Cameroon, Thesis (MSc), Leiden University, Leiden.
  52. SEAMAN, D. E., MILLSPAUGH, J. J., KERNOHAN, B. J., BRUNDIGE, G. C., RAEDEKE, K. J. & GITZEN, R. A. (1999) Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. The Journal of wildlife management, 63, 739-747.
  53. SINGH, H. S. & KAMBOJ, R. D. (1996) Predation pattern of the Asiatic lion on domestic livestock. The Indian forester, 122, 869-876.
  54. SMITHERS, R. H. N. (1971) The mammals of Botswana, The Trustees of the National Museums of Rhodesia, Salisbury.
  55. SPONG, G. (2002) Space use in lions, Panthera leo, in the Selous Game Reserve: social and ecological factors. Behavioural ecology and sociobiology, 52, 303-307.
  56. STANDER, P., E., (1991) Demography of lions in the Etosha National Park, Namibia. Madoqua, 18, 1-9.
  57. STANDER, P. E. (1997) The ecology of lions and conflict with people in north-eastern Namibia, Proceedings of a Symposium on Lions and Leopards as Game Ranch animals.
  58. STANDER, P. E. (2006) Population ecology & demography of Kunene Lions, Predator Conservation Trust, Chester.
  59. STUART, C. & STUART, T. (1997) Field guide to the Larger Mammals of Africa, Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
  60. TURNER, A. & ANTÓN, M. (1997) The Big Cats and Their Fossil Relatives: An Illustrated Guide to Their Evolution and Natural History, Columbia University Press.
  61. VAN BOMMEL, L., DE VAATE, M. D. B., DE BOER, W. F. & DE IONGH, H. H. (2007) Factors affecting livestock predation by lions in Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 45, 490- 498. VAN ORSDOL, K. G., HANBY, J. P. & BYGOTT, J. D. (1985) Ecological correlates of lion social organization(Panthera leo). Journal of zoology, 206, 97-112.
  62. VECTRONIC (2006) http://www.vectronic- aerospace.com/html/gps_plus.html. Vectronic Aerospace.
  63. VILJOEN, P. C. (1993) The effects of changes in prey availability on lion predation in a large natural ecosystem in northern Botswana. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 193-213.
  64. VOS, J. (2000) Food habits and livestock depredation of two Iberian wolf packs (Canis lupus signatus) in the north of Portugal. Journal of zoology, 251, 457-462.
  65. WEST, P. M. & PACKER, C. (2002) Sexual selection, temperature, and the lion's mane. Science, 297, 1339-1343.
  66. WHITE, F. (1983) The vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to accompany the Unesco/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa, Unesco, Paris.
  67. WHITE, G.C. & GARROT, R.A. (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego WIT, P. (1975) Preliminary notes on the vegetation of Waza National Park, FAO report, Rome.
  68. WOODROFFE, R. (2000) Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal conservation, 3, 165- 173. WOODROFFE, R. & FRANK, L. G. (2005) Lethal control of African lions (Panthera leo): local and regional population impacts. Animal conservation, 8, 91-98.
  69. WOODROFFE, R. & GINSBERG, J. R. (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science, 280, 2126-2128.
  70. ZAR, J. H. (1996) Biostatistical analysis, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  71. References ADAMS, E. S. (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 32, 277-303.
  72. ANDERSON, C. R. & LINDZEY, F. G. (2003) Estimating cougar predation rates from GPS location clusters. The Journal of wildlife management, 67, 307- 316. BAUER, H. (2003) Lion conservation in West and Central Africa: the case of Waza National Park, Cameroon, Thesis (PhD), Leiden University, Leiden.
  73. BAUER, H., DE IONGH, H. H., PRINCEE, F. P. G. & NGANTOU, D. (2003) Research needs for lion conservation in West and Central Africa. Comptes rendus. Biologies, 326, S112-S118.
  74. BAUER, H. & IONGH, H. H. (2005) Lion (Panthera leo) home ranges and livestock conflicts in Waza National Park, Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 43, 208-214.
  75. BAUER, H. & KARI, S. (2001) Assessment of the human-predator conflict with thematic PRA around Waza NP. PLA notes, 41, 9-13.
  76. BAUER, H. & NOWELL, K. (2004) West African lion population classified as regionally Endangered. . CAT News, 41, 35-36.
  77. BAUER, H. & VAN DER MERWE, S. (2004) Inventory of free-ranging lions Panthera leo in Africa. Oryx, 38, 26-31.
  78. BAUER, H., VANHERLE, N., DI SILVESTRE, I. & DE IONGH, H. H. (2008) Lion -prey relations in West and Central Africa. Mammalian Biology, 73, 70-73.
  79. BREUER, T. (2005) Diet choice of large carnivores in northern Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 43, 181- 190.
  80. BURT, W. H. (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 346-352.
  81. BUTLER, J. R. A. (2000) The economic costs of wildlife predation on livestock in Gokwe communal land, Zimbabwe. African journal of ecology, 38, 23-30.
  82. CHARDONNET, P. (2002) Conservation of the African Lion: Contribution to a Status Survey, International Foundation for the Conservation of Wildlife, France & Conservation Force, USA.
  83. EAST, R. (1984) Rainfall, Soil Nutrient Status and Biomass of Large African Savannah Mammals. African journal of ecology, 22, 245-270.
  84. ESRI (1992) Arcview 3.2, Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.
  85. FLIZOT, P. (1962) the Waza National Park in Northern Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 16, 293-297.
  86. FOBUZIE, P. T., CROES, B. M., BUIJ, R. & IONGH, H. H. (2007) Lion collaring operation in Waza National Park, Far North Province, Cameroon, May 5 -May 10, 2007, Unpublished.
  87. FRANK, L. G. (1998) Living with lions: carnivore conservation and livestock in Laikipia District, Kenya, DAI for United States AID Bethesda.
  88. FRANK, L. G., WOODROFFE, R. & OGADA, M. O. (2005) People and predators in Laikipia District, Kenya In: People and wildlife-conflict or coexistence. Cambridge University Press.
  89. FRANKE, A., CAELLI, T., KUZYK, G. & HUDSON, R. J. (2006) Prediction of wolf (Canis lupus) kill-sites using hidden Markov models. Ecological modelling, 197, 237-232.
  90. FUNSTON, P. (2001) Kalahari Transfrontier Lion Project: Final Report. Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa.
  91. FUNSTON, P. J., MILLS, M. G. L., BIGGS, H. C. & RICHARDSON, P. R. K. (1998) Hunting by male lions: ecological influences and socioecological implications. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1333-1345.
  92. GITTLEMAN, J. L. & HARVEY, P. H. (1982) Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behavioural ecology and sociobiology, 10, 57-63.
  93. HAYWARD, M. W. & HAYWARD, G. J. (2007) Activity patterns of reintroduced lion Panthera leo and spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta in the Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa. African journal of ecology, 45, 135-141.
  94. HAYWARD, M. W. & KERLEY, G. I. H. (2005) Prey preferences of the lion (Panthera leo). Journal of zoology, 267, 309-322.
  95. HEMSON, G. (2003) The ecology and conservation of lions: human-wildlife conflict in semi-arid Botswana., Thesis (PhD), University of Oxford, Oxford.
  96. HOLMERN, T., NYAHONGO, J. & ROSKAFT, E. (2007) Livestock loss caused by predators outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biological conservation, 135, 518-526.
  97. HOPCRAFT, J. G. C., SINCLAIR, A. R. E. & PACKER, C. (2005) Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 559-566.
  98. HOSMER, D. W. & LEMESHOW, S. (1989) Applied logistic regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  99. HUNTER, L. T. B. (1998) The behavioural ecology of reintroduced lions and cheetahs in the Phinda Resource Reserve, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa, Thesis (PhD), University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
  100. IKANDA, D. K. (2005) A study of the spatial dynamics and human interactions of African lions Panthera leo in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania, Thesis (MSc), University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam.
  101. IONGH, H. H. & BAUER, H. (2008) Ten years of ecological research on lions in Waza National Park, Northern Cameroon. CAT News, 48, 29-32.
  102. IONGH, H. H., BAUER, H. & HAMLING, P. (2004) Nine years of research on a lion (Panthera leo) population in the Waza National Park (Cameroon): a review. Game and Wildlife Science, 21, 433-446.
  103. JACOBS, J. (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection, a modification of the Forage Ratio and Ivlev's Electivity Index. Oecologia, 14, 413-417.
  104. KARANI, I. W. (1994) An assessment of depredation by lions and other predators in the group ranches adjacent to Masai Mara National reserve, Department of Wildlife Management, Moi University.
  105. KINGDON, J. (1997) The Kingdon field guide to African mammals, Academic Press, London.
  106. KOLOWSKI, J. M. & HOLEKAMP, K. E. (2006) Spatial, temporal, and physical characteristics of livestock depredations by large carnivores along a Kenyan reserve border. Biological conservation, 128, 529-541.
  107. KRUUK, H. (1980) The effects of large carnivores on livestock and animal husbandry in Marsabit District, Kenya, United Nations Environment Program-Man and Biosphere Program (UNEP-MAB), Nairobi.
  108. MERIGGI, A. & LOVARI, S. (1996) A review of wolf predation in southern Europe: Does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? The Journal of applied ecology, 33, 1561-1571.
  109. MILLS, M. G. L. (1992) Conservation management of large carnivores in Africa. Koedoe, 34, 81-90.
  110. MILLS, M. G. L. & BIGGS, H. C. (1993) Prey apportionment and related ecological relationships between large carnivores in Kruger National Park. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 253-268.
  111. MISHRA, C. (1997) Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environmental conservation, 24, 338-343.
  112. NIJHAWAN, S. (2008) Understanding human-large carnivore conflict in Chobe, Botswana, Thesis (MSc), Duke University, Durham.
  113. NOWELL, K. & JACKSON, P. (1996) Wild Cats Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, IUCN/SCC/Cat Specialist group, Gland.
  114. O'CONNELL-RODWELL, C. E., RODWELL, T., RICE, M. & HART, L. A. (2000) Living with the modern conservation paradigm: Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East Caprivi, Namibia. Biological conservation, 93, 381-392.
  115. OGADA, M. O., WOODROFFE, R., OGUGE, N. O. & FRANK, L. G. (2003) Limiting depredation by African carnivores: the role of livestock husbandry. Conservation biology, 17, 1521-1530.
  116. OMONDI, P., MAYIENDA, R. & TCHAMBA, M. (2007) Total aerial count of elephants, giraffes, roan antelopes and other wildlife species and ostrich in Waza National Park, Cameroon, WWF-Central Africa Regional Office, Yaoundé.
  117. OWEN-SMITH, N. & MILLS, M. G. L. (2008) Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web. The Journal of animal ecology, 77, 173-183.
  118. PATTERSON, B. D., KASIKI, S. M., SELEMPO, E. & KAYS, R. W. (2004) Livestock predation by lions (Panthera leo) and other carnivores on ranches neighbouring Tsavo National Parks, Kenya. Biological conservation, 119, 507-516.
  119. POLISAR, J., MAXIT, I., SCOGNAMILLO, D., FARRELL, L., SUNQUIST, M. E. & EISENBERG, J. F. (2003) Jaguars, pumas, their prey base, and cattle ranching: ecological interpretations of a management problem. Biological conservation, 109, 297-310.
  120. RADLOFF, F. G. T. & DU TOIT, J. T. (2004) Large predators and their prey in a southern African savannah: a predator's size determines its prey size range. The Journal of animal ecology, 73, 410-423.
  121. RUDNAI, J. (1979) Ecology of lions in Nairobi National Park and the adjoining Kitengela-Conservation-Unit in Kenya. African journal of ecology, 17, 85-95.
  122. SAND, H., ZIMMERMANN, B., WABAKKEN, P., ANDRÈN, H. & PEDERSEN, H. C. (2005) Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf-ungulate ecosystems. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33, 914-925.
  123. SCHALLER, G. B. (1972) The Serengeti lion: a study of predator-prey relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  124. SCHEEL, D. (1993) Profitability, encounter rates, and prey choice of African lions. Behavioural Ecology, 4, 90- 97.
  125. SCHOLTE, P., ADAM, S. & SERGE, B. K. (2007) Population trends of antelopes in Waza National Park (Cameroon) from 1960 to 2001: the interacting effects of rainfall, flooding and human interventions. African journal of ecology, 45, 431-439.
  126. SCHOLTE, P., DE KORT, S. & VAN WEERD, M. (1999) The birds of the Waza-Logone area, Far North Province, Cameroon. Malimbus, 21, 16-49.
  127. SCHULTZ, P. & TURK, R. (2002) Population ecology of the lion (Panthera leo) in Waza National Park, Cameroon, Thesis (MSc), Leiden University, Leiden.
  128. SEAMAN, D. E., MILLSPAUGH, J. J., KERNOHAN, B. J., BRUNDIGE, G. C., RAEDEKE, K. J. & GITZEN, R. A. (1999) Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. The Journal of wildlife management, 63, 739-747.
  129. SINGH, H. S. & KAMBOJ, R. D. (1996) Predation pattern of the Asiatic lion on domestic livestock. The Indian forester, 122, 869-876.
  130. SMITHERS, R. H. N. (1971) The mammals of Botswana, The Trustees of the National Museums of Rhodesia, Salisbury.
  131. SPONG, G. (2002) Space use in lions, Panthera leo, in the Selous Game Reserve: social and ecological factors. Behavioural ecology and sociobiology, 52, 303-307.
  132. STANDER, P., E., (1991) Demography of lions in the Etosha National Park, Namibia. Madoqua, 18, 1-9.
  133. STANDER, P. E. (1997) The ecology of lions and conflict with people in north-eastern Namibia, Proceedings of a Symposium on Lions and Leopards as Game Ranch animals.
  134. STANDER, P. E. (2006) Population ecology & demography of Kunene Lions, Predator Conservation Trust, Chester.
  135. STUART, C. & STUART, T. (1997) Field guide to the Larger Mammals of Africa, Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
  136. TURNER, A. & ANTÓN, M. (1997) The Big Cats and Their Fossil Relatives: An Illustrated Guide to Their Evolution and Natural History, Columbia University Press.
  137. VAN BOMMEL, L., DE VAATE, M. D. B., DE BOER, W. F. & DE IONGH, H. H. (2007) Factors affecting livestock predation by lions in Cameroon. African journal of ecology, 45, 490-498.
  138. VAN ORSDOL, K. G., HANBY, J. P. & BYGOTT, J. D. (1985) Ecological correlates of lion social organization(Panthera leo). Journal of zoology, 206, 97-112.
  139. VECTRONIC (2006) http://www.vectronic-aerospace.com/html/gps\_plus.html. Vectronic Aerospace.
  140. VILJOEN, P. C. (1993) The effects of changes in prey availability on lion predation in a large natural ecosystem in northern Botswana. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 193-213.
  141. VOS, J. (2000) Food habits and livestock depredation of two Iberian wolf packs (Canis lupus signatus) in the north of Portugal. Journal of zoology, 251, 457-462.
  142. WEST, P. M. & PACKER, C. (2002) Sexual selection, temperature, and the lion's mane. Science, 297, 1339- 1343.
  143. WHITE, F. (1983) The vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to accompany the Unesco/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa, Unesco, Paris.
  144. WHITE, G.C. & GARROT, R.A. (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego WIT, P. (1975) Preliminary notes on the vegetation of Waza National Park, FAO report, Rome.
  145. WOODROFFE, R. (2000) Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal conservation, 3, 165-173.
  146. WOODROFFE, R. & FRANK, L. G. (2005) Lethal control of African lions (Panthera leo): local and regional population impacts. Animal conservation, 8, 91-98.
  147. WOODROFFE, R. & GINSBERG, J. R. (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science, 280, 2126-2128.
  148. ZAR, J. H. (1996) Biostatistical analysis, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  149. Figure 8 Killing/scavenging percentages L1 (N=41) Cattle;
  150. 44% Uda sheep;
  151. 32% Killing/scavening percentage L2 (N=30) Kob;
  152. 00% Gazelle;