Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Cross-cultural Research (original) (raw)
Related papers
Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in program evaluation
The impact of economic policies on …
8 Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Program Evaluation Vijayendra Rao and Michael Woolcock This chapter outlines some of the ways and means by which inte- grating qualitative and quantitative approaches in development research and program evaluation ...
Integrating Quantitative And Qualitative Research For Country Case Studies Of Development
This paper reviews the use of combinations of quantitative and qualitative approaches (Q-squared) for country level studies with particular reference to the work of the Global Development Network (GDN). It discusses the main features of these approaches and examines their strengths and weaknesses. It argues that Q-squared approaches offer substantial potential benefits in terms of data quality, depth of understanding and policy analysis. However, these benefits need to be weighed up against the additional direct and indirect costs that will be incurred.
Importance of qualitative methods in Social Program Evaluation
2015
Social Program Evaluation (SPE) is the method and tool to address policy questions of diverse social actors to improve services (Greene, 2003). In India, the development programs are planned mostly using quantitative indicators. For instance, health and medical professionals prefer quantitative indicators such as, morbidity, mortality, prevalence, and incidence and so on. This undermines the qualitative aspects. There are instances in which combination of quantitative and qualitative are accepted. From the beginning, health programs are implemented based on quantified indicators by the planners. Many at times this leads to shift in the focus from the program objectives to the outcomes which are defined well in terms of quantified indicators. In this paper, author shares his experiences from his evaluation studies in the health and other development sectors. He is also attempting to suggest ways of developing qualitative indictors, which could be used for program planning. A study on...
While randomized experiments can be valuable tools in evaluating aid effectiveness, research designs limit the role of qualitative methods to ‘field visits’ or description of contexts. This paper suggests expanding the role of qualitative methods and highlights their advantages and limitations relative to survey methods. It reviews a range of qualitative methods and suggests that life histories are compatible with the internal and external validity criteria of randomized experiments. It illustrates this with a case study of their proposed use in an evaluation of the promotion of jatropha curcas, a second-generation biofuel, in Malawi.
Introduction to Special Issue: Qualitative Method/ologies in Development Studies
Forum for development studies, 2018
The articles in this special issue address a selection of questions in qualitative methods and methodologies in development studies, which is a topic that often seems to be overlooked or under-communicated in international journals. Searching through previous editions of Forum for Development Studies, we find only a few articles with methods as the primary topic, although method/ology is arguably addressed in articles' methods sections. For method/ological themes one has to turn to thematically focused journals such as Ethnography, or to recent resource materials such as Sage Research Methods Cases (Hansen, 2018). Whereas the wealth of textbooks within social sciences provides comprehensive methodological elaborations or overviews of methods, they may not be ideally suited for the needs within development studies. Undoubtedly, publications dedicated to methodologies and methods for fieldwork in the global South are scarce, with Doing Development Research (Desai and Potter, 2006) as one notable exception. Furthermore, the changing nature of the digital and global world opens up for new methods at the researchers' disposal. Far from the studies of the founding fathers and mothers of development studies and anthropology, globalisation and digitalisation processes impact on how one is able to perform research, i.e. on the methodsunderstood as the concrete techniques and practical choices involved in collecting and analysing data. Underlying such discussions there should also be room for methodological elaborationsunderstood as a systematically, theoretically, philosophical and disciplinary grounded reflection about the justifications for the chosen methods. This special issue was initiated in order to contribute to such discussions. It draws on an initiative by Professor emerita Turid Hagene that spurred the collaborative efforts of the Research Group on Development, Power and Inequality in the Section for Development Studies, Department of International Studies and Interpreting, Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway, and it comes out of two distinct experiences. First, it addresses concerns we have had in our own mainly qualitatively oriented research within the interdisciplinary field of development studies, where different disciplinary methodological traditions meet. Second, it draws on our experiences as lecturers in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 2016
Background: Donors and decision-makers use impact evaluation reports to assess the effectiveness of development programs and identify ways to improve the design and implementation of projects, programs, and policies in developing countries. Purpose: This paper will explore the existing published impact evaluation literature on development programs and provide an overview of the types of approaches and methods that are being used to conduct impact evaluations. Setting: NA Intervention: NA Research Design: The paper will examine published program evaluation literature in order to shed light on issues related to appropriate methods for impact evaluations of development programs. Data Collection and Analysis: Literature review. Findings: The paper will conclude by suggesting a list of approaches and methods that can be used to conduct impact evaluations of programs within the development context.
Qualitative Research for Development: A guide for practitioners
Qualitative research has much to offer to the practical work of humanitarian and development organizations. Growing recognition of the potential for qualitative research to enhance programme impact is putting pressure on development practitioners to adapt a 'research approach' in their monitoring, evaluation, accountability, and learning work. This introductory chapter starts off by outlining some of the ways in which qualitative research can be used to improve the impact, quality, and accountability of development projects and programmes. It will then introduce some basic principles of qualitative research and illustrate some of the ways in which qualitative research can be incorporated into various stages of the programme cycle.
Relevance of cross-cultural understanding for evaluations in development practice
Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 2016
In the evaluation profession, there is shared agreement that cross-cultural understanding is relevant for those working in communities and countries different from their own. This helps inform the selection of appropriate approaches, tools and processes. Perhaps more importantly, the concept of evaluation itself could be considered through a cross-cultural lens; such consideration may reveal a lack of shared understanding between different cultures. The idea of evaluation reflects values about change, development and risk; knowledge and wisdom; access to information and education; the completion of tasks; and, the maintenance of harmonious relationships. These values are not necessarily shared universally. This article draws links between understanding differences in cultural values and the practice of evaluation in international development—beyond the level of culturally appropriate method selection. A widely used model for understanding cultural value differences is applied to the...
Evaluation of Development Programs: Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
The World Bank Economic Review, 2013
The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent.