Between East and West: Memories of the Cold War (original) (raw)

The downturn of the East: The end of the Cold War and the American triumph

This paper seeks to answer the following questions: “Can the outcome of the Cold War be characterised as a triumph of US or “Western” liberalism? Alternatively, is there a more convincing interpretation?”. These questions are a broad and a deep argument to cope with at the same time. This work would try to give an attestable response based on the historical contingencies characterising the end of the Cold War and its long-term consequences: the victory of the West and the advent of its model of civilisation. The range of literature on the topic is extremely diverse. Amongst the scholarship, John Ikenberry, Sergio Fabbrini and Geir Lundestad contributed with excellent interpretations of the pivotal historical changes provoked by the end of the Cold War. They demonstrated how the Western model of civilisation not only affected but also shaped the Eastern hemisphere of the World. The choice of literature has been very mindful: considering the different schools of thoughts in the discipline of International Relations, the interpretations of these historians are constructivist, in the sense that they think leadership as the key factor to describe the outcome of the Cold War. The main matter of this research then would be to what extent they were right by verifying whether History gives greenlight to them or not.

The Cold War as a historical period: an interpretive essay

Journal of Global History, 2011

As a historical period, the Cold War may be seen as a rivalry between two nuclear superpowers that threatened global destruction. The rivalry took place within a common frame of reference, in which a new historical relationship between imperialism and nationalism worked in remarkably parallel ways across the superpower divide. The new imperial–national relationship between superpowers and the client states also accommodated developments such as decolonization, multiculturalism, and new ideologies, thus producing a hegemonic configuration characterizing the period. The models of development, structures of clientage, unprecedented militarization of societies, designs of imperial enlightenment, and even many gender and racial/cultural relationships followed similar tracks within, and often between, the two camps. Finally, counter-hegemonic forces emerged in regions of the non-Western world, namely China and some Islamic societies. Did this portend the beginning of the end of a long per...

“‘The Cold War? I Have it at Home with my Family’. Memories of the 1948-1989 Period Beyond the Iron Curtain”, in Konrad Jarausch, Christian Ostermann, Andreas Etges (eds), The Cold War: Historiography, Memory, Representation, Mouton, De Gruyter, 2017, p. 203-223.

Negotiating Cold War Culture at the Crossroads of East and West

2011

Since the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, our understanding of Cold War history has changed considerably. The wave of new research spurred by the opening of archives and opportunities for novel East-West comparisons threw into sharper relief aspects of the Cold War contest that had received little attention previously. It has become increasingly clear that the Cold War was not only a military, political, and economic conflict, but also one profoundly implicated in, and shaped by, key transformations in twentieth-century culture. 1 Capitalizing on the increased accessibility of primary sources from former socialist states, recent research has provided valuable insights into the politics of everyday culture on both sides of the Iron Curtain, 2 and we have seen as well the publication of several transnational accounts of the cultural Cold War spanning the West and the East. 3