It is Mine but it is Not Me: On the Borders of Authorship (original) (raw)
Related papers
Art, History, and Anachronic Interventions Since 1990
The theoretical contributions to modern historiography discussed in Chapter 1 differ in many respects yet are united in their attribution of specific roles to the historian. Assumed to be male in most of the texts discussed herein, he is envisioned as a mastermind of universalization and synthetization; an impartial guarantor of objectivity; a practical politician anchored in the present; an emphatic interpreter able to incarnate historical subjects; and a distant, anachronic observer of his contemporaries. Each of these assigned roles represents a distinct methodical approach to and practice of history. But despite this performative foregrounding of the historian's role, historical scholarship in and of itself has produced surprisingly little authorship criticism. Artistic historiography, on the other hand, comes with a rich-albeit ambivalent-art-theoretical legacy that places immense weight on the role of the artist. Art that deals with history thus provides abundant material for reflection on authorial (self-)conceptions and on how various (artistic) subjectivities might handle the "raw material" of history-its documents, persons, and stories. Examining the works of three female artists working in the field of history, this chapter illustrates how artistic, auctorial subjectivity and the author's task of representing absent voices can be negotiated, especially when encountering other historical subjects.
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective
Research Evaluation
This article aims to contribute to the discussion on authorship in contemporary science from Foucauldian and Kuhnian perspectives, highlighting the social aspects of science and the role of authorship in scientific revolutions. Thus, it describes the functions of the 'author' discussed by Foucault that can assist to reveal the characteristics of the scientific practice and examples of how theories are materialized. As a result, it identifies the ways in which modern science is developed and how knowledge is construed by multiple authors, group authors, the merit that is attributed by citations, etc. This article highlights the complexity of authorship attribution and the need to rethink generalized bibliometric techniques to evaluate science considering other aspects that go beyond the mere listing of the authors.
Authority Matters begins with an introduction, which traces idea of author and authority etymologically, then going back to the notion of author and authority in separate, thus culminating in intersections of both in same point and critically evaluating them. Through looking back to the multiple meanings associated with ‘author’ and ‘authority, in Latin, Greek, and its modern day English usage, it is attempted to find the overlapping and intersecting points. The common concept of ‘creating something, and producing meaning’ has been appropriated to origins, augere and auctor. Critically looking at history of shifting of terrains of concept of author, as Pease states, from its original meaning to the ideas like creator of alternative social system and alternative to political world, leads us to what autocratas, which Krieger has developed four stages as an historical analysis of authority.
2018
Literature and film generate symbolic as well as economic capital. As such, aesthetic productions exist in various contexts following contrasting rules. Which role(s) do authors and filmmakers play in positioning themselves in this conflictive relation? Bringing together fourteen essays by scholars from Germany, the USA, the UK and France, this volume examines the multiple ways in which the progressive (self-) fashioning of authors and filmmakers interacts with the public sphere, generating authorial postures, and thus arouses attention. It questions the autonomous nature of the artistic creation and highlights the parallels and differences between the more or less clear-cut national contexts, in order to elucidate the complexity of authorship from a multifaceted perspective, combining contributions from literary and cultural studies, as well as film, media, and communication studies. Dealing with Authorship, as a transversal venture, brings together reflections on leading critics, exploring works and postures of canonical and non-canonical authors and filmmakers. An uncommon and challenging picture of authorship is explored here, across national and international artistic fields that affect Africa, Europe and America. The volume raises the questions of cultural linkages between South and North, imbalances between the mainstream and the margins in an economic, literary or “racial” dimension, and, more broadly, the relation of power and agency between artists, editors, critics, publics, media and markets.
Since the proclamation of his return at the end of the 20 th century, the author reappears in a wide range of different scientific approaches: as a textual category, as a media phenomenon, as a civil person, as the subject of self-fashioning processes, and as an object of external determination.
Emerging Politics of Authorship: recovering collectivity, negotiating the risk
[sic] Journal for Literature and Cultural and Literary Translation, 2011
This article examines authorship as a socially embedded process by challenging Western notions of the autonomous creative genius. It considers social interactions between various agents in the field of literary production which in turn recovers the collective nature of modern authorship. Far from leaving it unexamined, it further contextualises authorial collectivity and its role in the emerging model of authorship.
Perspectives on Authorship and Authority
Analyses/Rereadings/Theories: A Journal Devoted to Literature, Film and Theatre
This article outlines selected shifts in thinking about authorship and authority that have occurred in literary and cultural studies in the aftermath of Roland Barthes’s proclamation of the death of the author, followed by the author’s many revivals. Reconsidering Barthes’s seminal essay and confronting it with Michel Foucault’s query about the author-function, the article comments on Seán Burke’s polemical stance concerning situated authorship. Against these general considerations, several areas in which authorship and authority have been reconceptualized are briefly discussed, referring to the themes addressed in this volume. These areas embrace the problems of representing and using somebody else’s story in visual arts and testimonial theatre, the challenges of individual and cultural situatedness of writing within one’s own output and in reference to more general cultural hauntings as well as the processes of self-formation in the interactions between a variety of texts forming ...
From Singularity to Multiplicity: The Power Cycle of Authorship, Between Submission and Subversion
Dacoromania Litteraria, 2016
The present article is dedicated to the guiding theme of “Collective Authorship” in its diverse contexts and notional meanings. Mapping the intellectual stakes and conceptual propositions of recent scholarship represents one of the main aims of the paper. Focusing on two important junctures, the historical perspective is complemented by a state of the art review covering several disciplinary fields. Finally, I will define two types of authorship: submissive and subversive. Authorship studies are undergoing major changes today, marking the shift from the romantic understanding of the author towards the construction of what I’ve called an authorial ecosystem which, in its turn, can be understood as being part of a larger (and circular) dynamic entity.
Authorship: Few Myths and Misconceptions
Science and engineering ethics, 2015
This article seeks to address and dispel some of the popular myths and misconceptions surrounding authorship of a scientific publication as this is often misconstrued by beginners in academia especially those in the developing world. While ethical issues in publishing related to authorship have been increasingly discussed, not much has been written about the myths and misconceptions of who might be an author. Dispelling these myths and misconceptions would go a long way in shaping the thoughts and plans of students, junior faculty and researchers in academia especially in the developing world.