From 'Mahometan Tyranny' to 'Oriental Despotism': The Secularization of Islam in French Political Thought (original) (raw)
Related papers
Encounters France Islam and the Secular Order
, l'Islam et la loi de 1905 Genèse coloniale d'un poncif : l'Incompatibilit e Raberh Achi 286 Les Juifs de France et la laïcit e. Essai de regard historique et jalons de comparaison avec le cas musulman J er emy Guedj 296 Allegory and Accusation: The Rhetoric of Islamo-gauchisme Emilio Spadola 308 Laïcit e as a Weapon: the Tool and the Target
France and Islam: Introduction
French Historical Studies, 2007
Recent global events have focused attention on the Islamic world and encouraged the resurgence of the unfortunate stereotypes of Muslims as fanatical and Islam as a religion with a proselytizing zeal structured by the jihad, or holy war. But many of the historical connections that the juxtaposition of France and Islam conjure up-the Crusades, orientalism, or the postcolonial "banlieues" and immigrant ghettos-are also associated with France initiating or participating in conflict and violence, be it military, political, social, or cultural. France's relations with Islam have always been difficult, at times hostile, at others more conciliatory, but a historiographical preoccupation with the most confrontational dimensions of the relationship obscures its complexity and diminishes the ambiguous roles of the players involved. The choice of the terms France and Islam to describe what follows is, of course, a conceptual anomaly: France signifying a state or nation, Islam a religion. Even if at an earlier stage of their relationship France, as a major Catholic country, had religious connotations, over time the significance of the term has shifted from Christian state to secular nation, whereas Islam has remained for the West a signifier of religion. Retaining these two terms, in spite of the evolution of their linguistic and cultural significance, is thus emblematic of the West's present
The Rise of Modern Europe and the Beginning of Modern Studies on Islam
2022
The study of Islam in Europe has changed considerably since the last decades of the twentieth century, on the one hand, because the study of Islam gained popularity and European scholars have broadened this academic domain, and, on the other hand, because European Muslims have now also engaged in an intensive study of Islam to know its foundations as well as of adopting these tenets in their every-day lives in European societies. The European scholars of Islam and the Muslim world received a wake-up call with the publication of Edward Said’s Orientalism in 1979. He argued that the academic objectivity claimed by these scholars was false since many were infatuated with preconceived notions of Orientalism about their objects of study. This image was perpetuated by the colonial supremacy of European countries in the Muslim world, and was reinforced by scholars in their academic work, Said claimed. Although Said’s accusations were too broad and not always sufficiently substantiated, they did hit a nerve in the European academic world. This self-reflection, in turn, sometimes swung too far the other way with academics blaming European colonial domination for all kinds of shortcomings in the Muslim world. In addition, the arrival of Muslims in the West brought a new challenge to the European study of Islam. Most conclusively, the Europeanization of Islam had always only seemed to weigh upon the Islamization of Europe.
French Secularism and Islam Beyond an Orderly Vision of Politics
This chapter outlines an analytical approach to the study of French secular politics (laïcité) and Islam since 1989. This approach emphasizes the heterogeneous logics of French secularism and argues against an orderly vision of secular politics. An orderly vision of politics refers here to an understanding of secular politics where the question of the object of politics (here “Muslims” and “Islam”) is seen as basically unproblematic. Put differently, the question of how power exercise is connected to secular knowledges is granted minor analytical importance. In fact, those who ask this question are almost exclusively interested in processes of racialization of Islam and the spread of Islamophobia. Meanwhile, the focus in studies on French secularism tends to be on various normative frameworks and their usage, and on how they specify the place of religion in modern society, the functioning of the public sphere, conditions of citizenship, etc. I want to argue the case for a much more important and more complex connection between knowledge and secular politics. It is more complex in the sense that the knowledges in question cannot be as easily disqualified as illegitimate as can racializing and Islamophobic discourses. This connection is constituted by institutionalized bodies of thought – i.e. social, historical, and aesthetic rationalities – which allow diverse members of the public to describe and analyse “Islam” and “Muslims” in a variety of in principle legitimate ways. These rationalities allow them to make diverse statements about policies which are held to be necessary, desirable, or feasible with regard to Muslims. These political rationalities need to be taken into account if the aim is to analyse French secular politics, its modes of reasoning and legitimating policies, and if the aim is to analyse how Muslims engage with ‘the secular context’ of France or, rather, what exactly they engage with. These rationalities – which are secular in the sense that their authority does not depend upon any kind of religious tradition – constitute an essential part of the secular discursive context. This conceptualization of secular politics highlights the insufficiency of the secular-religious dyad as an analytical matrix for politics. Through the rationalizations examined here, “Islam” is configured as ‘more’ (or ‘less’) than a matter to be classified in the legal category “worship”, and a similar observation can be made about “Muslims”. Moreover, these processes are not simply concerned with drawing boundaries between the secular and religious. These diverse processes of rationalization are not conjunctural, nor can they be reduced to particularities of the debate on Islam, the racialization of Muslims or Islamophobia. Ultimately, the multiple rationalities of secularism lead up to a question about how to conceive of secularism’s unity. Put differently, they indicate that the question whether one can imagine a power “that unites in itself a what, a why, and a how” (Foucault 2000:336) also deserves to be asked about secular politics in France.
Recent calls to decolonize the curriculum have both built on work done over the past two decades in premodern studies and challenged it to go further. Particularly in light of the United States' continuing military interventions in the Middle East, Afghanistan, and East Africa, its domestic surveillance apparatus, and its associated Islamophobic rhetoric, Edward Said's Orientalism (1978) remains a central text with which to approach such a decolonizing mission. Or does it? This conversation considers how Orientalism, and Orientalism, have influenced the current structures of knowledge production about the "East" in both European and Near Eastern premodern studies, asking whether Said's critique is still relevant to contemporary discussions. Kaya Şahin (an early modern Ottoman historian), Julia Schleck (an early modern English literary critic), and Justin Stearns (a historian of the medieval and early modern Islamic Middle East) met at a 2010 NEH Summer Seminar designed to bring together in conversation European and Middle Eastern historians, art historians, and literary critics. They continue that conversation here by reflecting on how premodern scholars might continue to build on Said's work in ways that recognize the limitations of the original work and productively adapt its insights to earlier texts and histories.