Payment of Ecosystem Services for Cultural Heritage: Contributions from the New Urban Agenda (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sustainable approaches to natural environment and cultural heritage. Two sides of the same coin? 1
2010
The aim of the article is to analyse and concisely present similarities between theoretical economic approaches to natural environment protection, its specific features as a sustainable development resource and the involved governance challenges and such approaches in the field of cultural heritage. The study is based on desktop research consisting of a thorough review of up to date literature in the field of cultural economics and its sub-field of heritage economics in comparison to ecological economics. The paper indicates a broad range of similarities of key theoretical considerations and issues between the two fields including application of general sustainability principles, public good characteristics, multiplicity of stakeholders, diverse values they bestow on cultural and natural heritage and the linked practical challenges of economic valuation and forms of public involvement in the management of such resources. Although the article is theoretical in nature, the discussed p...
Agriculture
Sustainable production besides economic, energetic, and environmental aspects should consider social and cultural features of the territory in which it relies. This occurs above all for agriculture that is intrinsically related to the territory. Today, the territory as a landscape represents a complex eco-system (subjects, communities, traditions, cultures, and specific agricultural systems) and a valuable vehicle for art and history and it is also a strategic asset to defend and promote with environmental policies. The topic of urban preservation and regeneration has been increasing by opening up to other factors such as the engagement of local communities and the contribution they can give toward the development of the identity and the symbolic universe of every community especially for historic territories. The main research question of this study is: Can historic territories be described as the landscape of a complex eco-system able to support a new cultural policy? In addition,...
Sustainable approaches to natural environment and cultural heritage. Two sides of the same coin?
2010
The aim of the article is to analyse and concisely present similarities between theoretical economic approaches to natural environment protection, its specific features as a sustainable development resource and the involved governance challenges and such approaches in the field of cultural heritage. The study is based on desktop research consisting of a thorough review of up to date literature in the field of cultural economics and its sub-field of heritage economics in comparison to ecological economics. The paper indicates a broad range of similarities of key theoretical considerations and issues between the two fields including application of general sustainability principles, public good characteristics, multiplicity of stakeholders, diverse values they bestow on cultural and natural heritage and the linked practical challenges of economic valuation and forms of public involvement in the management of such resources. Although the article is theoretical in nature, the discussed parallels between natural and cultural heritage are an excellent argument for a closer integration of practical public natural environment and heritage protection efforts as discussed with respect to Poland in the final section of the article. The articulated analogies have so far been stressed in the publications on cultural economics rather than in the academic literature focused on the natural environment. The article provides an overview of diverse issues of great importance both for sustainable management of natural and cultural heritage sites and as such can be both a reference paper and an inspiration for future further comparative research.
Making heritage more valuable and sustainable trough intersectoral networking (2), 15092016 (1)
The ENCATC Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, online magazine, 2016
The subject of this paper is to show the importance of inter-sectoral and partnership activities, and added value of the heritage. The main goal is to emphasize the importance of the inter-departmental relations and forms of participatory governance that contribute to each pillar of sustainable development, in particular by activities related to the: preservation, conservation, restoration, greater visibility and valorization of the natural and cultural heritage. The work mainly relies on a qualitative analysis of previous empirical scientific research and practical examples of successful Worlds cases. We think that it is necessary to complement the operation of theory, practice and public policy papers, as well as international recommendations, to make all the relevant phenomena considered, so we will try to do that in relation to the subject and main goal of the paper. Paper reflects basic theory, examples and best practices in order to capture the importance of partnership strategies in participatory governance, with active participation in the decision-making process in order to make heritage more valuable. Our main hypothesis is: Long-term preservation of heritage seeks for a necessary interdisciplinary approach, and the actual market visibility by linkages of different departments such as culture, economy, CCI environment, society, through responsible forms of tourism (eco-cultural).
The concept of heritage and its possible operational nature. Notes on the Italian case
2015
Our paper aims at focusing the difference between heritage, landscape and environment in the current disciplinary debate. The term landscape is related to the level of "anthropisation" of a given territory, as shown by qualitative data and scenarios: form, figure, territorial structure, sedimentation, diachrony. Conversely, the term environment somehow reflects the exasperation of a specialised point of view, emphasising the "index of naturalness". In the case of Italy, the relationship between architecture and landscape has acquired over time an exceptional quality, so much so that it could be termed as an historical construction par excellence. This condition has created "such a beautiful countryside to resemble a city" shaping a wide range of unique local identities, while modernisation has mainly been interpreted as an alteration of spatial relations (atopy, placelessness). At the same time, environmental disciplines (and environmental impact assessments), when dealing with architecture and town planning, have significantly overlooked the idea of environment, placing it outside any historical perspective. The result is the exasperation of an abstract conflict between environment ecology and human settlement. The case of Italy, and of Central Italy in particular (e.g. Tuscany) may provide good examples to approach such current problems. Our paper shall investigate a series of case studies bringing to the fore the existence network structures at the regional level, restoring landscape to the realm of modernization. If landscape can be considered an eminently cultural outcome gained over the long period of time (heritage, as a fundamental feature of a given society), then a non-destructive modernization should face heritage with an operational, not merely conservative, approach. A key question should be posed: for whom was landscape designed and is now to be protected?
Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Economic Benefits, Social Opportunities and Policy Challenges Eds: George Mergos, Nikolas Patsavos, 2017 Technical University of Crete This book is an output of InHeriT, an ERASMUS+ project in line with the policy priorities for education, training, and youth of Europe 2020. The project's objectives are to bring together transnational expertise that will: (a) increase public awareness for the sustainable development potential of cultural heritage; and (b) initiate social initiatives that would build entrepreneurial partnerships for investing on local and regional cultural heritage for sustainable development. It aspires to explore several of the dimensions of the strong economic potential for sustainable development that cultural heritage represents for society. Economic benefits, social opportunities, and policy challenges are dimensions of the public debate on cultural heritage along with other historical, artistic and aesthetic issues. In addressing these issues, it brings together contributions of experts from various fields and provides an opportunity to open up a dialogue on balancing preservation and change of cultural heritage assets. Hence, its aim is to raise awareness on the economic dimensions of cultural heritage, exploring its role in generating sustainable development at local and regional levels, focusing mainly on built, architectural heritage. The volume is by necessity eclectic and collects contributions from researchers and policy makers from a wide range of disciplines, from architects and city planners to economists, archaeologists, and policy experts, providing different perspectives on the issues. The various contributions illuminate this approach on the economic value of cultural heritage resources, review cases where cultural heritage has been successfully used to regenerate the economy and foster local and urban development, and illustrate the various economic benefits, social opportunities and challenges of cultural heritage for sustainable development.
Conservation of Cultural Heritage
Conservation of Cultural Heritage, 2013
Cultural heritage as well as its interpretation are in constant flux. Conservation principles and praxes have also been changed according to new challenges and opportunities which have occurred in times of sustainable development and smart specialisation strategies. This study discusses the development of the cultural heritage sector since the 1960s. Pier Luigi Sacco's concept, Culture 3.0, is used as a point of departure to understand the development from a supply-driven conservation praxis, Conservation 1.0 (with focus on protection), via Conservation 2.0 (with conservation and restoration in focus), to a demand-driven conservation praxis, Conservation 3.0, with focus on adaptive re-use and spill-over effects in connection with sustainable development and regional growth. Going from protection to pro-action, cultural heritage advocators need to leave their comfort zone and enter the trading zone.
2016
As is well-known, art and science are two ways of presenting the history of the world, not two subjects in contrast with each other. Art, in other words cultural and landscape heritage, rightly considering as such also the environment, is linked to the history of man. Related to this, are the various artistic expressions and, therefore, the various generational movements with their related social events and problems from the past to the present, which are linked to each other temporally. It is true that “Nature does not support the human footprint”: this is what the World Wide Fund for Nature highlights in describing the great imbalance that exists due to the consequent irreversible damage that occurs with the passing of time. In the processes directed at the possible reacquisition of the compatibilities to protect nature, life conditions and the historical-artistic heritage, some case studies are reported that have been carried out over the years. The research concerned the protect...
Cultural Heritage and Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review
Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites , 2017
During the last decade, we have witnessed an increased interest in Ecosystem Services (ES), including the so-called ‘cultural ecosystem services’ and its subcategory of ‘cultural heritage’. In this article, a review of academic literature of ES and cultural heritage is carried out. ES has primarily been developed by scholars from the ecological and economic disciplines, and in this article, we discuss how this impacts the way in which cultural heritage is used and conceptualised in ES literature. Based on the conceptual review, we initiate a discussion of what the implications for cultural heritage management could be if the heritage sector adopts the rationales in the ES framework.