The 2015 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for The Management of Fungal Infections in Mechanical Circulatory Support and Cardiothoracic Organ Transplant Recipients: Executive Summary (original) (raw)
Related papers
Antifungal prophylaxis following heart transplantation: systematic review
Mycoses, 2014
Patients with heart transplantation have a high incidence of infectious complications, especially fungal infections. The aim of the systematic review was to determine the best pharmacological strategy to prevent fungal infections among patients with heart transplant. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies reporting the effectivenesss of pharmacologic strategies to prevent fungal infections in adult patient with a heart transplant. Our search yielded five studies (1176 patients), four of them with historical controls. Two studies used inhaled amphotericin B deoxycholate, three used itraconazole and one used targeted echinocandin. All studies showed significant reduction in the prophylaxis arm. Different products, doses and outcomes were noted. There is a highly probable benefit of prophylaxis use, however, better studies with standardised doses and comparators should be performed.
Fungal Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Patients
Surgical Infections, 2003
Background: Solid organ transplantation is becoming increasingly more common in the treatment of end-stage organ failure. Opportunistic fungal infections are a frequent life-threatening complication of transplantation. Materials and Methods: In this article, a review of the infections in the different organ transplant recipients is presented. Results: The incidence of fungal infections in organ transplant patients ranges from 2% to 50% depending on the type of organ transplanted, kidney recipients being the least frequent and liver recipients having the highest rate of infection. New antifungal medications and immunosuppressants have changed the spectrum of fungal treatment and prevention. Conclusion: Prompt recognition and treatment of infection is imperative for successful therapy. Further advancements in early detection and the development of less toxic medications will lead to refinements in the treatment of fungal infections.
Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients
Transplant Infectious Disease, 2010
Contemporary epidemiology and outcomes of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are not well described. From March 2004 through September 2007, proven and probable IFIs were prospectively identi¢ed in 17 transplant centers in the United States. A total 429 adult SOT recipients with 515 IFIs were identi¢ed; 362 patients received a single and 67 patients received ! 2 organs. Most IFIs were caused by Candida species (59.0%), followed by Aspergillus species (24.8%), Cryptococcus species (7.0%), and other molds (5.8%). Invasive candidiasis (IC) was the most frequently observed IFI in all groups, except for lung recipients where invasive aspergillosis (IA) was the most common IFI (Po0.0001). Almost half of IC cases in liver, heart, and lung transplant recipients occurred during the ¢rst 100 days post transplant. Over half of IA cases in lung recipients occurred 41 year post transplant. Overall 12-week mortality was 29.6%; liver recipients had the highest mortality (P 5 0.05). Organ damage, neutropenia, and administration of corticosteroids were predictors of death. These results extend our knowledge on the epidemiology of IFI in SOT recipients, emphasizing the occurrence of IC early after non-lung transplant, and late complications with molds after lung transplant. Overall survival appears to have improved compared with historical reports.
Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients
Future Microbiology, 2012
Invasive fungal infections are a major problem in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Overall, the most common fungal infection in SOT is candidiasis, followed by aspergillosis and cryptococcosis, except in lung transplant recipients, where aspergillosis is most common. Development of invasive disease hinges on the interplay between host factors (e.g., integrity of anatomical barriers, innate and acquired immunity) and fungal factors (e.g., exposure, virulence and resistance to prophylaxis). In this article, we describe the epidemiology and clinical features of the most common fungal infections in organ transplantation. Within this context, we review recent advances in diagnostic modalities and antifungal chemotherapy, and their impact on evolving prophylaxis and treatment paradigms.
Transplantation Proceedings, 2011
Use of various induction regimens, of novel immunosuppressive agents, and of newer prophylactic strategies continues to change the pattern of infections among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Although invasive fungal infections (IFIs) occur at a lower incidence than bacterial and viral infections in this population, they remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In March 2008, a panel of Italian experts on fungal infections and organ transplantation convened in Castel Gandolfo (Rome) to develop consensus guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of IFIs among SOT recipients. We discussed the definitions, microbiological and radiological diagnoses, prophylaxis, empirical treatment, and therapy of established disease. Throughout the consensus document, recommendations as clinical guidelines were rated according to the standard scoring system of the
Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Background. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD). Data on IFD burden in pediatric patients are limited. We aimed to determine the incidence and outcome of IFD in a large cohort of pediatric patients who underwent SOT. Methods. A single-center cohort of pediatric patients who underwent SOT between 2000 and 2013 was assembled retrospectively. The patients were followed for 180 days after transplant or until death to determine the presence or absence of IFD. The 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group Consensus Group criteria were used to define IFD as proven or probable. The incidence of IFD, all-cause mortality rate, and case-fatality rate at 180 days were calculated. Results. Among 584 pediatric patients who underwent SOT, 13 patients sustained 14 episodes of IFD (candidiasis, aspergillosis, and mucormycosis). The overall incidence was 2.2% (14.3 IFD events per 100 000 patient-days). The IFD rates according to transplant type were 12.5% (1 of 8) (heart/lung), 11.4% (4 of 35) (lung), 4.7% (8 of 172) (liver), 0% (0 of 234) (kidney), and 0% (0 of 135) (heart). Three patients with IFD (2 lung and 1 heart/lung) died, and all these deaths were deemed likely attributable to the IFD; the case-fatality rate was 21.4% (3 of 14). Conclusions. The overall incidence of IFD in these pediatric SOT recipients was low but varied across transplant type, with heart/lung and lung recipients having the highest IFD rate. Given the attributable case-fatality rate, the risk of death resulting from IFD is potentially high. More data on groups at higher risk, such as lung transplant recipients, are needed to guide targeted antifungal prophylaxis. Keywords. invasive fungal disease, organ transplant recipients, pediatrics, retrospective studies.
Prophylaxis of Fungal Infections in Transplant Patients:What has Changed in Recent Years?
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation, 2023
Objective: The present work aimed to review the invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and antifungal prophylaxis used in the last 20 years in transplant patients to identify the changes that occurred in this period and discuss the most current conducts. Methods: This is a systematic review in which the PubMed database was used, in which scientific articles from the last 20 years were selected, covering clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews of the literature and meta-analyses. Results: According to the present study, posaconazole and voriconazole are the antifungal drugs of choice for IFI prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, as posaconazole is not available in the public health system in Brazil, the most viable option remains voriconazole. Regarding IFI prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation (SOT), it was observed that there are variations depending on the transplanted target organ, and there is no evidence of its need in kidney transplantation. Although azoles are also the most used and bring clear benefits in liver and lung transplantation, some current studies have placed echinocandins on the same level, encouraging their use to prevent IFI in these patients. Conclusion: In the last five years, there has been a great shortage of clinical trials comparing different antifungal prophylaxis. New studies are needed to establish the most appropriate protocols for each condition and profile of the transplanted patient.
Management of fungal infections in lung transplant recipients
Current Pulmonology Reports, 2015
Lung transplantation is one of the great advances in modern medicine, and it is the only treatment for end-stage lung disease. As surgical techniques, immunosuppressive agents, and graft survival have improved, infections have become the major cause of morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients, particularly fungal infections. This paper provides an overview of the most important fungal infections that occur in lung transplant recipients excluding the endemic mycoses.
Objectives: Heart and lung transplant recipients are at risk for invasive fungal infections. This study evaluated the affect of single-agent antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole on the rate of fungal infections after heart or lung transplant. Materials and Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed to evaluate the rate of fungal infections in heart and lung transplant recipients at the University of Kentucky Medical Center over 4.5 years who received itraconazole as a single therapy prophylaxis. Results: Eighty-three recipients (42 heart, 41 lung) had an overall fungal infection incidence of 16.9% (14/83), while the incidence was 11.9% for heart recipients (5/42), and 22.0% for lung recipients (9/41). Conclusions: Single-agent use with itraconazole in heart or lung transplant recipients did not affect the rate of fungal infection as compared with previous reports. The incidence of fungal infection increased significantly within 3 months after escalation of immunosuppressant for treatment of acute rejection.