Folklore and the Construction of National Identity in Nineteenth Century Russian Literature (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mysteries of Great Russian Literature
2022
In English-language publications the set phrase ‘great Russian literature’ pops up quite frequently when Russian culture is discussed or the Kremlin’s current abuse of this culture for political ends. Curiously, no thought is given to the fact that no set phrases of this type exist for talking about English, French or German literature. Yet, at present this unthinking use of the ossified expression ‘great Russian literature’ in the West facilitates Moscow’s weaponization of culture. Hence, the urgent need arises to reflect on the origins of this strange expression, which would help wean Western commentators off it in favor of freer and evidence-based thinking.
Studies in East European Thought, 2021
This review discusses an important recent book by Galin Tihanov, the George Steiner Professor of Comparative Literature, Queen Mary University of London.
“My Country Is Russian Literature”: History and Literary Development in the Golden Age
This chapter provides a historical perspective on Russia’s golden age literature, examining the political and social environment that significantly informed the literary discourse of the time. During the nineteenth century, marked by revolutionary ferment and increasing demands for social change, literature was the primary medium for discussing the nation’s fate. Russia’s oscillation between reform and reactionary measures, resulted in an unparalleled surge of literary production in response to politics, thus creating a literary canon that still resonates for people today, both within and beyond Russia’s borders. This chapter provides the historical background for the literary criticism that makes up the rest of Russia's Golden Age, an edited volume designed for undergraduates.
Slavic and East European Journal. Vol. 50, No. 1 (2006). Pp. 204-212, 2006
Of course, I am no soothsayer, and the answer to my outrageous title is probably dependent more on what happens outside the university than anything that could take place inside its hallowed walls. For all I know, the ongoing transformation in the function of education in American society may render humanistic education utterly obsolete in the coming decades, which would certainly have a "chilling effect" on the study of Russian Literature (Scholes; Drucker). But I do not intend to rehearse the familiar territory of The University in Ruins here (Readings; also see Guillory). What I am concerned with is our very own little comer of the university, the Slavic Department, and my own sub-discipline within it, the study of Russian Literature. What is its outlook for the coming hundred or so years, given favorable, or at least not saltstrewn, institutional soil to grow in? 2 I offer to you that the future does not look so bright.
‘Russian literature will fix everything’: The Read Russia project and cultural statecraft
Russia's Cultural Statecraft, 2021
This chapter examines the role of Russian literature in the promotion of Russian culture abroad. While Russian classics like Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, and Chekhov are globally recognized, literature held marginal importance in Soviet and early post-Soviet Russian cultural diplomacy. Despite the enduring influence of 19th-century writers, the promotion of Russian literature abroad hasn't matched its esteemed status in the West. The chapter delves into the efforts of Russkiy Mir, Rossotrudnichestvo, and the Read Russia project, established in 2012. Despite its aim to promote Russian literature globally, Theocharis suggests that Read Russia often attracts Russian-speaking audiences, positioning it as a mobilizer of diasporic communities.
The Lessons of Russian Literature
Russian Review, 2023
Over a career of almost forty years, Gary Saul Morson has written, co-written, or edited more than a dozen books on Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Bakhtin, and literary theory, countless scholarly essays, and many reviews for a broader reading public. The preeminent Slavist of his generation, Morson is also a legendary teacher: his lectures on the Russian novel at Northwestern University, where he has taught since 1986, typically attract hundreds of students. He is also one of our profession's few public intellectuals, a prominent critic of critical theory and of how the humanities, and especially literature, are taught in U.S. colleges and universities today. A strong advocate for the humanities in general education, in recent years Morson has argued for their importance in public policy as well. 1 His latest book, Wonder Confronts Certainty, is a polemical survey of modern Russian literature, history, and culture that brings together the various strains of his work. The title refers to two profoundly different ways of perceiving the world, and to the real-world consequences of each. On one side are those who wonder at the irreducible complexities of the world, see the future as unpredictable and open to unexpected possibilities, and insist on individuals' personal responsibility. On the other are those who "know" that the future is already determined by laws of History that have been discovered by modern social science. Morson's point is that, if the future is already determined and can be known, traditional notions of freedom, ethics, morality, and personal responsibility for one's actions are all rendered meaningless. Although there is nothing new about this argument, certainly not to readers of Dostoevsky, rarely, if ever, has it been argued by a literary critic or historian so fiercely and with such gusto. For Morson, literature is the source of the wisdom that allows us to live the good, that is, the ethical, life. Unimpressed by the stylistic innovations of literary modernism, appalled by its penchant for revolution, and horrified by the relativism of post-modernism, Morson has spent a lifetime reading, teaching, and writing about Dostoevsky and Tolstoy, whose novels he considers the high point of the genre. His position has long been that to read great literature is to join with the greatest thinkers of the past in a timeless dialogue concerning the eternal questions: What is the purpose of life? The nature of evil? How should we live? What is to be done? By allowing readers to spend significant amounts of time inside the heads of fully realized and thickly described characters, he argues, realist novels provide invaluable training and practice in navigating the personal, political, and moral dilemmas of everyday life. More than philosophy, theology, psychology, sociology, anthropology, or any other professional discourse, realist novels provide practical insights into these issues. Hence the importance he places on how literature is taught in colleges and universities.
Cultural Colonialism and Resistance in the Nineteenth-Century Russian Novels
The Criterion , 2021
The Russian obsession with European culture, predominantly French and English, is not a recent phenomenon. The nation of Russia was always straddled between the two continents of Asia and Europe, and this peculiar geographical position extended into the cultural domain as well. In my Paper, I will be specifically exploring the novel Anna Karenina (1878) by Leo Tolstoy and the novels Crime and Punishment (1866) and Devils (1871) by Fyodor Dostoevsky. Through my Paper, I will be exploring how seminal writers like Tolstoy and Dostoevsky wrestled with the cultural crisis in the nineteenth century Russia brought about by the influx of European ideas such as nihilism, utilitarianism, socialism, atheism etc into the Russian mainland. Keywords: Colonialism, Novels, Ideology, Russian Orthodox Church, Nihilism, Leo Tolstoy, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Christianity, Socialism.
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, 2019
There are few literary critics and theorists that delve into the afterlives of past theories and theoretical trends as dazzlingly and lucidly as Galin Tihanov does. In this respect, his latest volume, The Birth and Death of Literary Theory: Regimes of Relevance in Russia and Beyond, is not an altogether unforeseen event in terms of its premises, nor is it a surprise in terms of its object of study. His latest work revolves around the location of theory, underlining the co-dependence between literary theory and history, employing, with a slightly different twist, Michel Foucault's notion of regime of relevance, "a constellation of social and cultural parameters that shape the predominant understanding and use of literature for the duration of that particular constellation" (19), all the while not only owing to, but also investigating the imprint on contemporary literary studies of Eastern and Central Europe theory, notably the Russian formalist critical and theoretical developments.