(Re)Signifying Spaces of Violence in Present-Day Chile: The Herstories of Colectivo de Mujeres Sobrevivientes Siempre Resistentes (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social Identities, 2006
The Southern Cone's Cold War-era dictatorships in the 1970s and 1980s unleashed state violence in the region through forced disappearance, political imprisonment, torture, blacklisting and massive exile unparalleled in its modern history, justified under the USled neo-colonial ideology of National Security Doctrine. Region-wide state repression in this period emerged in response to the rise of the 1960s radical movements against structural economic reforms and privatizations and for agrarian public reforms and public programs. This period was followed by US-led neoliberal ideologies and economic reform programs of 'structural adjustment' in the 1980s, programs which needed authoritarian governments to take control of radical oppositional politics and serve the special needs of elites and corporate power. In Uruguay, such neoliberal political and economic arrangements helped shape a transitional politics of silencing and obliteration of the former regime's human rights abuses. Such policies silenced ordinary people's capacity to collectively remember and transmit their experiences of political repression and solidarity. Among them, women's experiences of state terror in Uruguay were particularly invisible. This article documents, discusses and offers a case study of the emergence, development and gendering of memory in a women's testimonial project that grew to resist Uruguayan 'policies of oblivion' and brought women's previously silenced experiences of the dictatorship back into public discussion.
The Body and State Violence Womens Oral History Chile JWH20190618 85118 12ujq4a
Journal of Women's History, 2019
This article analyzes group interviews with three women from Valparaíso, Chile, who were imprisoned together under Augusto Pinochet's military dictatorship (1973–1990). Sylvia, Alicia, and Oriana's oral histories reveal that they frequently spoke about their bodies to convey their experiences of state violence. Sylvia and Alicia constructed narratives of rebellion against the regime and challenged long-standing notions of men's domination over women's bodies. Oriana's account, however, uncovers the complexity of learning to live with the enduring effects of sexual torture, while at the same time defying conventional ideas about sex and motherhood. The article also emphasizes how these women spoke about structural and subtler forms of violence, including denying basic hygienic conditions, constraining freedom of movement, and restricting the right to control birth. It demonstrates how these oral histories were mediated by historical discourses of gender, maternity, sexuality, class, and race.
Cadernos PROLAM/USP
Since 2015 a new human rights movement struggle against violence against women, Ni una menos. From the perspective of cultural studies, there is a strong link between these women struggling for cultural transformation and the long lasting battle against oblivion carried out by Argentinas Human Rights Movement and especially, by the Mother and Grandmother of Plaza the Mayo. Against the background of state terrorism and its literature written by women, this contribution reflects on methodology studying Argentina women’s literature on state repression and also on the role of women as agents of social transformation.
Torture in the Female Body Femininity in Chile and Argentina’s Dictatorships
2017
This paper examines the methods and conceptualizations of torture in Chile and Argentina, with a particular focus on gender perspectives. Through a detailed review of existing literature and personal testimonies from women who experienced torture, the study highlights the gendered dimensions of state violence during these dictatorial regimes. It argues that femininity was systematically targeted through acts of sexual violence and rape, aimed at dismantling the principles of femininity such as sexuality, fertility, and motherhood. The paper asserts that torture was not only a violation of human rights but also a gendered assault on women’s roles and identities. It advocates for a gender-oriented approach to the representation of torture in collective memory, emphasizing that traditional portrayals are insufficient for capturing the full scope of the trauma endured by women. By proposing a narrative that integrates gender perspectives, the paper calls for a more empathetic and accurate remembrance of the past that acknowledges and addresses the historical invisibility of women. This approach seeks to challenge patriarchal narratives, foster empathy, and demand justice and accountability for the victims of gendered torture.
The Gendered Revolutionary Body: Memory and Resistance in Torre das Donzelas
Mistral, 2022
In her 2018 documentary Torre das Donzelas (Maidens' Tower), Susanna Lira explores the experiences of women who were political prisoners during the dictatorship via interviews and a spatial recreation of the women's cellblock of the Tiradentes prison, known as the Torre das Donzelas. Lira creatively employs set design and sound as discursive elements that complement the women's testimony and broaden its portrayal of memory and haunting; moreover, as this article argues, the older women (senhoras) who embody past and present political resistance enable the film to contest conventional expectations regarding guerrillas, political prisoners, and the romantic, masculine notion of revolution.
Radical History Review, 2008
This interview brings to light the transnational and gender politics of the Chicana/o movement during the 1970s, as well as the effects of state terrorism and torture on the political trajectory of the Chicana activist and organizer Olga Talamante. On November 10, 1974, uniformed men arrested Talamante, a Chicana activist from Gilroy, California, and thirteen young Argentine activists in Azul, Argentina. The young leftist activists had been working on health and educational projects when martial law was declared. Accused of violating the National Security Act, Talamante was subjected to four days of terror—including electric shocks, beatings, and psychological torture—and incarcerated in the earliest days of Argentina's “dirty war” of state terrorism. Born in Mexicali, Mexico, and raised in Gilroy, Talamante had attended the University of California at Santa Cruz and was involved with the student group Movimiento Estudiantil Chicana/o de Aztlán (Chicana/o Student Movement of Az...
Gendered Wars, Gendered Memories: Feminist Conversations on War, Genocide and Political Violence, 2016
The September 1980 military coup in Turkey and the following three-year military dictatorship suppressed almost all political opposition through street violence, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary incarceration, and the physical and psychological torture of people in police custody or in prison. Women of various ages who actively participated in different oppositional groups before and after the coup, were taken into custody and imprisoned for different durations on charges ranging from putting up illegal posters to engaging in armed action. However, their political participation and their experiences during imprisonment were silenced in the memory and historiography of the period in general, and in the memory of leftist organizations in particular. In this chapter, I trace the gendered cultural memory of leftist women incarcerated during the military regime in Turkey between 1980 and 1983 and conduct a gender analysis at the intersection of patriarchy, nationalism, and leftist opposition. In order to understand the memory culture that developed, I analyze several printed memory documents which present the testimonies of female ex-prisoners who spent time in the prisons of the military junta. After tracing the continuum of silence and erasure around women's encounters with political violence, I question the possible reasons for the overall silencing of certain experiences, such as sexual violence and moments of vulnerability, in existing written narratives of the 1980 coup. By contextualizing this silence within a larger history of political violence that preceded and succeeded the coup, I argue that three interrelated hegemonic discourses largely define the memory culture of women ex-prisoners: a discourse of normative feminine respectability which deems rape the wrongdoing of the victim and which stigmatizes the woman and her significant male kin, a discourse of national security which legitimizes sexual torture for the sake of maintaining the social order, and a discourse of strength which, particularly in leftist circles, equates resilience with masculinity and which does not allow for vulnerability, even when faced with severe violence. I then argue for a feminism which simultaneously challenges all three discourses, as well as the authoritarian structures they impose, as a means of coming to terms with past and present atrocities.