NUCLEAR DARKNESS: The Inner Story (2022) (original) (raw)
Related papers
New Perspectives, 2020
In The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy, Matthew Kroenig presents the reader with a research puzzle he sets out to resolve: 'Why does the United States pursue military nuclear advantages if the costs are so high? Is US policy irrational? Or are these costs being exaggerated by the opponents of America's nuclear forces?' (2018: 190). His unambiguous answer is that American policy is not only rational but also virtuous to the extent that it has pursued nuclear superiority and pressed the advantages it confers in games of brinksmanship. Indeed, for all its rigorous application of positivist research methods, a normative commitment to nuclear primacy incontestably animates the book, counselling American leaders to seize the present opportunity to establish a new dominance in atomic weaponry. To our mind, Kroenig's empirical and normative case for nuclear hegemony is vitiated by a radically unempirical leap of faith that supposes nuclear actors to be consistently rational and that the world obeys that same rigid apodictic account of rationality, preserving us from the worst. In this review, we will endeavour to unpack the internal logic of the book's argument and show how that logic and the corresponding dismissal of the 'downsides' of nuclear superiority rely on ignoring the possibility that the world may be more chaotic and less predictable than Kroenig wants it to be.
Journal of International Political Theory
This Introduction presents the seven closely interlinked papers that explore the theme of this Special Issue, and one of the enduring existential questions for International Relations: the nuclear condition in the twenty-first century. The Special Issue is the second to come from two workshops sponsored by a UK Leverhulme grant, and it builds upon the first, more theoretical Special Issue, which brought Classical Realist and Critical Theory texts into dialogue. The major concern in the first Special Issue—the focus on modernity, crises, and humanity—is taken up here in more grounded practical terms, framed around the existential fears of nuclear annihilation. Each of the contributions re-assess the contemporary nuclear condition from within the theoretical frameworks provided by Classical Realism and Critical Theory. The engagement with both traditions allows the contributors to diagnose what is new, and what remains constant, in the contemporary nuclear condition.
A Second Nuclear Revolution: From Nuclear Primacy to Post-Existential Deterrence
Journal of Strategic Studies, 2009
and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution , reselling , loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS, A THREAT OF HUMANITY EXTINCTION
Nuclear weapons AND humanity extinction, 2022
The paper is all about the nuclear weapons. It provides the platform of answers to the question why do we need to stop the nuclear weapons? As already has been appearing an arrogant person who cares nothing about the power of these weapons, it may be rarely assumed that they have no knowledge about these weapons, so the paper gives some this basic important knowledge. The way it is built, mechanism, and some other things important for them to change. And that is one of the purposes of the paper. The main objective of this paper is to show the power of nuclear weapon and convince humanity why we should stop nuclear weapons.
In Awe of the Atom Proliferation, Threats, and Costs of Nuclear Management
The article argues that security continues to remain a concern as nuclear weapons have not only raised stakes given their potential to unleash Armageddon but have also not addressed the conventional/sub-conventional ways of war as they continue unabatedly. This has, as argued by Yusuf in his book, invited a third-party mediation to avoid potential use of nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons, therefore, have raised the costs of security and risks of their unintentional use either due to some misperception or due to egoistic nature of people who may be in control of them.
Myths, symbols, society and nuclear energy
International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy and Ecology, 2012
Today, can we really ascertain whether Humanity has effectively derived more good than evil from the discovery of radioactivity a century ago? The answer hinges on the judgement that we and our fellow-citizens make about the impact of the applications of nuclear physics, by reference to a number of fundamental values: the concern to preserve our planet, its inhabitants and its environment; the need to avoid the risk of conflicts; and the guideline of the development of all peoples. At the collective level, an ethic must enable every social group, every nation and, perhaps, humanity, to form a community of behaviours. This places us at the very heart of the nuclear debate.
Opposing Trends: The Renewed Salience of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Abolitionism
2018
w This paper discusses two opposing trends defining the current nuclear order: the renewed salience of nuclear weapons and nuclear abolitionism. Whereas nuclear weapon states and their allies have put increasing value on nuclear deterrence in recent years, several non-nucleararmed states and civil society highlight the urgency of nuclear disarmament. The latter trend culminated in 2017 with the negotiation of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which seeks to promote disarmament by strengthening the global stigma on nuclear weapons. Most nuclear weapon states have rejected this approach and have identified the treaty itself as a threat. This paper argues that focus should shift from disagreements over the TPNW to the shared goal of reducing nuclear threats. The most urgent issue facing the NonProliferation Treaty (NPT) is the lack of progress on the implementation of its disarmament pillar, which puts the onus on nuclear weapon states to start tackling the secur...