Evolution of Migration and Asylum Policy on the EU level (original) (raw)

Migration and Asylum Policy Within EU. Causes, Needs, Strategic Policy and Evolutions

Ovidius University Annals: Economic Sciences Series, 2019

A number of European structures have been and are concerned about the phenomenon of migration that has involved Europe so dynamically in recent years, being the biggest challenge in the field, after World War II. The structures we refer to have participated in managing this phenomenon of migration by: reforming EU asylum rules, discouraging irregular migration, saving lives and securing external borders, implementing a strong common asylum policy, developing the new policy on legal migration and like. Thus, we aim to investigate the most important aspects of migration and asylum, including: the specific causes and needs related to Maslow's pyramid, legal and illegal migration, the way that some of the EU institutions have contributed to the migration and asylum reform and so on.

International Migration and Asylum in the European Union: Recent Developments and Policy Reactions

Europe, following North America, is one of the most attractive migration and asylum destinations in the world. According to studies, international migration benefits the EU because today the EU confronts dual demographic challenges: aging of population and population decline. Though some believe that Europe needs immigrates for its economy, others claim that immigrants are harming the European Union by making European Societies less cohesive. Also, there is significant public anxiety about internal and external migration in Europe making this situation susceptible to exploitation by politicians and extreme parties. Respect for human rights is a core principle for the EU, hence, the EU is obliged to help asylum-seekers and react to refugees within the EU borders humanely and with human dignity. The European Union authorities are aware that immigrants are needed for the EU’s future but member states have different sensitivities, priorities, and concerns regarding the migration and asylum policies. This paper aims to analyze the recent developments, challenges, policy reactions, whether the EU needs a new common migration and asylum policy.

The Immigration and Asylum Policy of the European Union

2016

Mass migration, as it appears in the 21st century, is one of the greatest challenges of our globalized world. The unanswered questions of European Union (EU) immigration policy that emerged over the past few decades have become more pressing than ever. One of these urgent questions is: how can we provide for a developing European economy in an era of demographic decline in a way that it is based on the opportunities opened up by legally regulated forms of migration. A second question is: how can the EU ensure the safety of the newly arriving people in need and, at the same time, keep away illegal migrants and eliminate criminal activities related to migration. The European Union is destined to spread the principles of peace and unconditional respect for human rights not only within its own borders, but also on a global scale, when engaging in international affairs. In addition to observing human rights, however, the EU must also take into account all security considerations that are...

The Twofold (Internal and External) Dimension of European Union's Migration and Asylum Policies: Recent Cases and Future Scenarios

EURINT, 2018

European Union's policies on migration and asylum raise double-ditched problems. In the EU, the latter's Court stated that in these areas solidarity is a binding principle: consequently, EU Member States must comply with EU decisions assigning quotas of international protection seekers to each EU State. The paper inspects also agreements between, on one hand, EU Member States (or the EU as such) and, on the other, non-EU countries as origin or transit States of international protection seekers with the view of relocating such individuals to those latter countries. This practice raises doubts if latter countries were deemed non-safe states, e.g. in case they weren't part to 1951 Geneva Convention. These issues are relevant for the development of relations between EU and its member states as well as in the perspective that EU performs its international legal personality in full compliance to international law rules on migration and human rights protection.

European Migration Policies and the Right of Asylum

2016

The European Union is confronted with a deep migration crisis, at a time when the EU has changed from being a source of stability and security into becoming a generator of political instability and economic chaos. This chapter outlines the main parameters of Europe's immigration issue and the right of asylum. It presents the European migration policies of the last decade and traces the reasons behind its complete or near failure. The European Union takes into account how to rid itself of migrants through certain measures of tightening the law on asylum, and closing the borders. The result is that those states which had most fought against borders and walls and were committed to them being permanently eliminated, are now rushing to raise them again. Meanwhile, the security threat that has increased across the whole Union due to the mismanagement of migration. The European Union has spent years developing the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). The aim of CEAS is to ensure the r...

THE DEVELOPMENT OF EU MIGRATION POLICY

Migration case that exists as of human history and demostrate continuity has been revealed itself in different dimentions as a result of the globalization process affecting the whole world. EU countries has become one of the center of attraction in this increasing migration movement with line of economic and security elements. According to recent researches EU has aproximately 2 million immigrants. Furthermore the number of immigrants is expected to increase further as a consequence of globalization, economic and demographic factos, wars, climate change and politic trouble. Because of that migration policy of EU, has become an increasingly important feature of the Union's relations with third countries. At this point migrants, who are out of the EU's control can be seen as a problem that needs to take precaution on the other hand a solution for ageing EU population. One of the most important negative impact can be that immigrants have been observe to cause problems for EU countries integration and alienation. Especially for years the illegal and unskilled immigrants problems lead the EU to take precaution against unwanted immigration instead of creating new policies. .Inspite of enterprise and discussion for years, a real migration policy hasn't execute by EU leadars. In this study, the future of EU migration policy will be assessed and EU's common migration policy development efforts will be examined by considering the couses of migrants to the EU countries.

The evolving EU asylum and migration law

in Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi and Philippe De Bruycker (eds), Research Handbook on EU Asylum and Migration Law (Edward Elgar 2022) , 2022

This chapter introduces the Research Handbook on EU Migration and Asylum Law and provides a holistic panorama of the development of EU’s migration and asylum policies, characterised both by evolution and by stasis, drawing from the contributions in the collection as well as from our own research. We analyse the content and level of refinement of legislative harmonisation in EU’s asylum, legal migration, return and irregular migration, visa, external border control, and integration policies. We then focus on the development of the administrative component of EU’s migration and asylum policies using the interdisciplinary framework of administrative governance and exploring four issues: responsibility assignation in the EU asylum policy, EU agencies, EU funding, and migration databases. Finally, we critically assess the external dimension of EU’s asylum and migration policies stricto sensu but also the broader embedding of migration management imperatives in EU’s external relations.

EU MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION POLICY: REGULATIONS, PLANS AND BORDER CHALLENGES

The InterAgency Institute Policy Brief Series, 2021

The migratory flows, a phenomenon that has occurred since the beginning of humanity, have increased significantly in the last decade due to the refugee crisis. While the migrant moves to another country by choice, having as one of his/her purposes the search for better living conditions, the refugee moves because of a direct threat linked to situations of violence such as wars and political and religious conflicts. Although many of them leave their countries with the expectation of returning to their places of origin after the end of the conflicts, the time spent as a refugee can exceed twenty years. Therefore, it is important to have a migration, asylum, and integration policy, based on human rights, that assures to the migrant and the refugee the right to be welcomed and included in the chosen destination to safeguard their existence. This is still the challenge for several countries, especially for countries that are part of the European Union and are still in the process of consolidating their territory after the liberalization of internal borders.

Managing migration and asylum in Europe: three proposals for Europe 2020

Asylum is a common concern for both Northern and Southern European countries, although they look at the problem from different perspectives. Southern countries are in fact exposed to pressures of irregular migration and asylum seeking because of their geographical proximity to zones of instability and conflict and have to find ways to effectively filter mixed flows, providing international protection to those who need it and managing irregular migration. On the other hand, Northern European countries are more "protected" from irregular migration because of their geographical position but have been traditionally the preferred destinations of asylum seekers and hence face mostly the problem of properly processing applications rather than that of filtering them at their borders. There is an important gap, though, in the asylum acquis that needs to be addressed. While rejections are valid throughout the EU, hence if a member state rejects the application of an asylum seeker s/he cannot apply in another member state, positive decisions do not provide for an EU status nor member states are obliged to recognize such decisions.