Mental Health Towards Social and Economic Inclusion: Nothing Else Matters! (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social Support as a Protective Factor for Mental Health
2014
Objective: Th e study aims to determine the impact of social support as a protective factor for health on depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction in patients treated for the diagnoses of F10.2 Alcohol dependence and F32 Depressive episode at psychiatric hospital. Methods: A quantitative approach was selected for the research. To collect data, a questionnaire battery comprising four standardized questionnaires was used: PSSS (Perceived Social Support Scale) by JA Blumenthal, BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory) by Beck et al., SAS (Self Rating Anxiety Scale) by Zung, and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire by Fahrenberg et al. Results: Th e results of the research indicated that there is a statistically signifi cant diff erence in the levels of social support between the control group and the focus group (patients diagnosed with depression and alcohol dependence). Th e research confi rmed the assumption of the existence of a signifi cant negative relationship between the levels of anxie...
Mental health and social support
Chittagong University Journal of Biological Sciences, 2013
The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of social support on mental health. A total of 100 adult respondents (50 normal, 50 mental patients) of age ranging from 18 to 45 were selected as the sample of the study. The Bangla version of Social Support Scale & Mental Health Questionnaire or GHQ-12 was used in the study. Three aspects of social support were measured: number of social support (SSN), importance of social support (SSI) and satisfaction of social support (SSS). Results of the present study indicated that normal and mental patients differed significantly from each other in terms of social support. This means that the more the social support the better was the respondents mental health. The result also indicated that normal people had the better mental health than mental patients. Gender had no significant effect on normal & mental patients. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cujbs.v3i1.13410 The Chittagong Univ. J. B. Sci.,Vol. 3(1&2):95-107, 2008
Structures and Processes of Social Support
Annual Review of Sociology, 1988
This chapter reviews the recent literature on social support and health and its relation to preexisting research and theory in the areas of social networks and social integration. We identify crucial directions for future theoretical and empirical work, focusing on the need to better understand the structures and processes through which social relationships affect human health and wellbeing. Two elements of social relationship structure are distinguished: (a) social integration, which refers to the existence or quantity of social relationships, and (b) social network structure, referring to the structural properties that characterize a set of relationships. We further identify three social processes through which these structures may have their effects: (i) social support, which pertains to the emotionally or instrumentally sustaining quality of social relationships; (ii) relational demands and conflict, referring to the negative or conflictive aspects of social relationships; and (iii) social regulation or control, referring to the controlling or regulating quality of social relationships. We also consider the social (as well as psychological and biological) determinants of levels and consequences of relationship structures and processes. In conclusion, we discuss the relevance of research and theory on social relationships and health to current demographic trends and public policy concerns. Recent scientific interest in social support derives largely from lectures by two distinguished physician epidemiologists with strong psychosocial interests and expertise-John Cassel's (1976) Wade Hampton Frost Memorial Lecture to the American Public Health Association and Sidney Cobb's (1976) Presidential Address to the Psychosomatic Society. Cassel and Cobb each reviewed extant studies to demonstrate the centrality of social relationships and supports to the maintenance of health, emphasizing their potential to moderate or buffer potentially deleterious health effects of psychosocial stress and perhaps of other health hazards (also see Caplan 1974 and Caplan & Killilea 1976). Their papers stimulated new research on the impact of social relationships on all aspects of health as well as subsequent reviews of relevant studies conducted both before and after 1976.
Alternative Mechanism to Deal with Stressful Condition: Do We Really have a Social Support?
Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 2021
This study aims to determine the role of health promoting behavior as a mediator of the relationship between perceived social support and psychological distress in poor young adults in DKI Jakarta. The research data collection was directly conducted by visiting the participants, young adults with age 8-29 years old (N = 314). The research instruments used were HPLP II, Social Provision Scale (SPS), Symptom-25 Checklist (HSCL-25). The results of the mediation analysis showed the significancy that health promotion behavior partially mediated the relationship between perceived social support and psychological distress, with indirect effects (β = .003, p = <.01) and direct effects (β =-.022, p = <. 01). Thus, perceived social support can directly increase psychological distress or through health promotion behavior first. People who perceive themselves get social support will have feeling that are cared for and loved, so that they will motivate themselves to be involved in healthy behavior and reduce psychological distress.
Social Interaction and Social Support
Journal of Social Issues, 1984
Typical research models of social support are overly simple on two grounds. First, they treat social support as exogenous to the model. That is, models incorporate the effects of social support on stressors and on psychological distress, but typically ignore the influences of stressors, psychological distress, personal characteristics of recipients, and environmental constraints on support. Second, the models typically consider only positive consequences of social interactions, although these interactions may also have negative consequences. Further, actions that are perceived as helpful by the donor, the recipient, or both can have harmful effects if they do not fit individual circumstances. Five dimensions offit between the characteristics of the recipient and those of the supportive act are proposed: amount, timing, source, structure, and function. Implications for research and intervention are discussed. Models and studies of social support should be improved in two ways. First, many studies treat social support as though it were exogenous to the model. Such studies, in caricature, assess some form of stressor, show the effects of the stressor on some mental or physical health outcome, and demonstrate that social The writing of this article was supported, in part, by the Russell Sage Foundation. The authors are grateful for criticisms and suggestions from Urie Bronfenbrenner, Arlene Brownell, Barbara J.
Mental health and adequacy of social support: A four‐wave panel study
2011
LISREL analyses with manifest variables were used to examine the causal relationship between mental health and adequacy of social integration and of attachment, measured at four consecutive waves each four months apart, in a representative sample of 225 adult residents in Canberra. Mental health was assessed with the 30-item General Health Questionnaire. The analyses suggest that while there is no temporal relationship between adequacy of attachment and mental health, adequacy of social integration is influenced by earlier mental health. The temporal relationship between adequacy of attachment and adequacy of social integration appears to be reciprocal. * Requests for reprints.
Social support and social structure
Sociological Forum, 1987
The burgeoning study of social support in relation to social stress and health would benefit from increased attention to issues of social structure. Three aspects of social relationships, all often referred to as social support, must be more clearly distinguished-(l) their existence or quantity (i.e., social integration), (2) their formal structure (i.e., social networks), and (3) their functional or behavioral content (i.e., the most precise meaning of "social support")-and the causal relationships between the structure of social relationships (social integration and networks) and their functional content (social support) must be more clearly understood. Research and theory are needed on the determinants of social integration, networks, and support as well as their consequences for stress and health. Among potential determinants, macrosocial structures and processes particularly merit attention." 3~e study-of "social support," especially in relation to health, has emerged seemingly out of nowhere in the last decade. A search of the Social Science Citation Index for articles with the term "social support" in their titles revealed an almost geometric rate of growth in the late
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2010
This study examined the association between life events and common mental disorders while accounting for social networks and social supports. Participants included 1920 adults in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Cohort who were interviewed in 1993-1996, of whom 1071 were re-interviewed in 2004-2005. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the data. Social support from friends, spouse or relatives was associated with significantly reduced odds of panic disorder and psychological distress, after experiencing specific life events. Social networks or social support had no significant stress-buffering effect. Social networks and social support had almost no direct or buffering effect on major depressive disorder, and no effect on generalized anxiety disorder and alcohol abuse or dependence disorder. The significant association between social support and psychological distress, rather than diagnosable mental disorders, highlights the importance of social support, especially when the severity of a mental health related problem is low.