The Supreme Court ’ s positions in Lochner and Plessy are paradigmatic examples of what is not the law , but learning (original) (raw)
Related papers
How Constitutional Law Casebooks Perpetuate the Myth of Judicial Supremacy
Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent
Duke Law Journal, 1998
Foreword: The Books of Justices
Michigan Law Review
Correspondence: The Stuff of Constitutional Law
The Constitutional Canon As Argumentative Metonymy
Faculty And Affiliate Scholarship Series, 2009
Toward a Revisionist History of the Supreme Court
Cleveland State Law Review, 1988
The Review of Politics, 1998
American Constitutional Law and History
2012
Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation. By DENNIS BAKER
Canadian Public Administration, 2010
Scalia & Garner's Reading Law: A Civil Law for the Age of Statutes?
2013
Fiction and the Languages of Law Understanding Contemporary Legal Discourse ( PDFDrive )
Book Review of By What Right? A Commentary on the Superem Court's Power to Revise the Constitution
William Mary Law Review, 1976
Judge Posner, Judge Wilkinson, and Judicial Critique of Constitutional Theory
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THE MYTH OF THE GREAT JUDGE
Book Review of The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy
1986
Constitutional Law and Precedent
The role of precedents and case-based reasoning in constitutional adjudication
Constitutional Law and Precedent, 2022
Developments in Constitutional Law: The 1994-95 Term
papers.ssrn.com
2015
ILSA Journal of International Comparative Law, 2010
Marbury\u27s Myths: John Marshall, Judicial Review and the Rule of Law
2004
Textualism, Constitutionalism, and Federal Statutes
William Mary Law Review, 1991
Marbury's Myths: John Marshall, Judicial Review and the Rule of Law
Bepress Legal Series, 2004
Political Research Quarterly, 2007
Choice of Law, the Constitution, and" Lochner
Virginia Law Review, 2008
If History Mattered: John Marshall and Reframing the Constitution
Michigan Law Review, 2003
E. T.: The Extra-Textual in Constitutional Interpretation
1984
The Legitimacy of the Constitutional Judge and Theories of Interpretation in the United States
The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1994
Index to the Journal of Supreme Court History Volumes 1-35 (1976-2010)
Journal of Supreme Court History, 2012
The Constitutional Canon: The Challenge Posed by a Transitional Constitutionalism
Constitutional Commentary, 2000
Oran Doyle, Conventional Constitutional Law (2015) 38 DULJ 311
High-Impact Constitutional Litigation
Litigios constitucionales de alto impacto Una perspectiva latinoamericana para la protección y aplicación de los derechos fundamentales, 2022
Static History and Brittle Jurisprudence: Raoul Berger and the Problem of Constitutional Methodology
BCL Rev., 1984
Historiography and Constitutional Adjudication
Modern Law Review, 2023
US Supreme Court Decisions: Judicial Philosophy, Precedent and Originalism
Constitutional Law Review Paper