Mount Athos with shine: luxury artworks and their patrons (10th - 15th centuries), Hilandarski Zbornik 15 (2021), 7-21. (original) (raw)

ONLINE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: THE CAST OF PIETY: MEDIEVAL AND POST-MEDIEVAL METALWORK ON MOUNT ATHOS (10th-16th c.), Friday 2- Saturday 3 December 2022- Organizing Committee: Paschalis Androudis - Dimitris Liakos

The Diptych of the Despots of Epiros at the Cathedral of Cuenca: opus venetum and Byzantine workshops in the 14th-century art The Cuenca Diptych is one of the most outstanding examples of the metalwork production in Late Byzantine Art. This precious and luxurious object is undoubtedly related to the patronage of Thomas Preljubovic (1367-1384) and his wife, Maria Palaiologina during their ruling in the Despotate of Epirus. However, due to the hybrid character of its technical and artistic features, the selection of the relics and the deliberate defacement of Thomas' portrait, there is a debate about its date, place of production (Ioannina, Meteora, Constantinople?) and original setting of the diptych. A detailed study of this gorgeous icon allows us to raise some questions about the appropriation of Venetian forms by Byzantine metalworkers in the second half of the 14 th century and determinate the extend of which its craftsman had access to the two prestigious Veneto-Byzantine diptychs associated to the patronage of king Milutin in Chelandari and St Paul's monasteries in Mount Athos. One the one hand, this enables us to reassess the hybrid character of these Veneto-Byzantine workshops from the end of the 13 th century onwards and the spreading and impact of their art and aesthetics in the late Palaiologan art. On the other hand, this analysis highlights how this distinctive aesthetic choice of the patrons usually sought the prestige and legitimacy of their linage.

Medieval Mount Athos between Wealth and Poverty

Medieval Mount Athos between Wealth and Poverty (The Medieval Mediterranean, 142). , 2024

Part 1. Capital Connections: Athonite metochia in Constantinople ‎1. Athonite metochia in Constantinople (10th–12th Centuries) (Oltean) ‎2. Mount Athos and the Wealth of Constantinople (14th–16th Centuries) (Melvani) ‎Part 2. Problems of Property: Founding and Financing Monasteries on Medieval Mount Athos ‎3. General Legal Norms for Monastic Property in Byzantium and Their Implementation on Mount Athos: The Case of Hilandar (Maksimovič) ‎4. Pourquoi fondait-on des monastères sur l’Athos aux xe et XIe siècles? (Kaplan) ‎5. Annuity Endowments and Sovereign Foundations on Mount Athos (Chitwood) ‎Part 3. Iberian Efflorescence: Three Case Studies from the Golden Age of Iviron Monastery ‎6. Liturgical Commemoration and Its Material Value in the Georgian Book of Commemorations (Agapes) of Iviron Monastery (Chronz) ‎7. In Praise of a Businessman: The Hegumenate Account of Paul of Iviron (1170–1184) (Smyrlis) ‎8. The Dynamics of Donations to Iviron Monastery on Mount Athos (According to the Book of Commemorations [Agapes]) (Tabuashvili and Kekelia) ‎Part 4. Consolidating Wealth in a New World: Mount Athos and the Ottomans ‎9. Endowment, Rule, and Theology: Political Theology in the Endowment Deeds for Mount Athos of 15th- and 16th-century Wallachia (Grigore) ‎10. Archival Treasures of the Holy Mountain: Interpreting Ottoman and Arabic Documents as Sources of Athonite Wealth (de Obaldía) ‎Part 5. Material Remains: Athonite Manuscripts, Seals, and Digital Humanities ‎11. Byzantine Monasteries and Their Wealth as Shown by Lead Seals: The Case of the Imperial Monastery of Lakape (Filosa) ‎12. Manuscripts as Part of the Wealth of Athonite Monasteries (Melissakis) ‎13. OpenAtlas: An Open-Source Application to Map Historical Data with CIDOC CRM (Eichert, Richards and Watzinger)

Program- ONLINE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: Written to Last: Medieval and Post-Medieval Inscriptions in Mount Athos (10th-16th c.), 16 and 17 February 2024- Organizing Committee: P. Androudis- D. Liakos

Dear colleagues, We are delighted to share with you our initiative for an International Conference devoted to aspects of Byzantine and Post byzantine Inscriptions of Mount Athos, to be held virtually via Zoom in 16-18 February 2024. As an eminent center of cenobitic monasticism since the tenth century, Athos benefited from the patronage of Byzantine emperors and aristocrats who financed buildings and precious objects. Inscriptions provide evidence for this rich activity which continued in the following centuries. The study of the Byzantine and Post byzantine inscriptions in Mount Athos has long been neglected and thus, the present Conference aims to provide a fresh impetus on the field. Our scholarly meeting would like to offer an interdisciplinary forum for a selection of papers that touch upon some of the following aspects:  Byzantine inscriptions in monuments  Byzantine dedicatory inscriptions  Byzantine funerary inscriptions  Byzantine inscriptions in sculptures  Byzantine inscriptions in minor arts  Inscriptions in lead seals  Byzantine inscriptions in woodworks  Byzantine inscriptions in frescoes  Byzantine inscriptions in icons  Latin inscriptions  Georgian inscriptions  Old Slavonic inscriptions  Arabic inscriptions  Ottoman inscriptions  Pseudo-inscriptions  Heraldry and inscriptions  Graffiti  Monograms  Postbyzantine inscriptions in monuments  Postbyzantine dedicatory inscriptions  Posbyzantine funerary inscriptions  Postbyzantine inscriptions in sculptures  Postbyzantine inscriptions in minor arts  Postbyzantine inscriptions in woodworks  Postbyzantine inscriptions in frescoes  Postbyzantine inscriptions in icons  Donors and their ideology as reflected in inscriptions  Innovation of patronage through inscriptions  Critical editions of inscriptions  Detailed interdisciplinary analysis of inscriptions  Visual qualities of inscriptions  Databases of inscriptions The Proceedings of the Conference will be published. ORGANIZING COMMITTEE: Paschalis ANDROUDIS, Assistant Professor of Byzantine Art and Archaeology, School of History and Archaeology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (pandroudis@hist.auth.gr) Dimitris LIAKOS, Dr. Archaeologist, Ephorate for the Antiquities of Halkidiki and Mount Athos (liakos712003@yahoo.gr)

Family Inheritance: Classical Antiquities Reused and Displayed in Byzantine Cities

Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art. V: Collection of Articles (Proceedings of the International Conference, St. Petersburg 2014), 2015

Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова Государственный Эрмитаж Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства V Сборник научных статей Санкт-Петербург 2015 УДК 7.061 ББК 85.03 А43

Afterlives of Byzantine Monuments

Aphorism 1 ıνατ τζαχιλινδιρ, χιρχιρ αχμεινδιρ, σουκιουτ ακιλινδιρ, σεριατ αριφινδιρ inat cahilindir, hırhır ahmeindir suküt akılındır, şeriat arifindir.

Archival Evidence and Byzantine Art in Fifteenth-Century Venetian Crete: The Case of Georgios Mavrianos and Konstantinos Gaitanas, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 77 (2023), pp. 245-319

Dumbarton Oaks Papers 77, 2023

life of Jesus Christ and the Virgin in the Church of Panagia in Kato Symi (1419); 8 (5) Emmanuel Souranas (Surana, read by Cattapan as Hurana) and Andronikos Synadenos, both engaged by Georgios Piperes to paint the Church of Panagia in Malia (Damalia) (1399); 9 (6) Angelos Apokafkos, employed by Markos Pavlopoulos to paint the Last Judgment in the Church of Panagia of the Angels (Sancta Maria Angelorum) in Chandax (1421; modern Heraklion); 10 (7) Georgios Mavrianos (Mauriano, read by Cattapan as Mancuso), employed by the commissaries of the Venetian noble Anna Correr (Corrario, read by Cattapan as Cornario) to paint Christ the Savior and other saints in the Church of Christ the Savior in Kitharida (Chithar ida, read by Cattapan as Chitanda) (1422); 11 and (8) Georgios Pelegrin, engaged by Lauro Querini, commissary of the Venetian noble Mandalucia Querini, to paint the Crucifixion in the Church of St. Hieronymus, probably in Chandax (1470). 12 Three additional documents have been left by Cattapan without transcription and unfortunately without archival references. These refer to (9) the abovementioned Georgios Mavrianos, who received a payment for his work in the Church of St. George in Vrachasi (Vraghassi, read by Cattapan as Veargassi) (1401); (10) Konstantinos Moschatos, who returned the payment he had received in advance because he had not finished his work at an unnamed church (1402); and (11) Alexios Apokafkos, who promised to paint some curtains after his return from Valsamonero (1412). 13

«An assemblage of luxurious Byzantine Glazed tableware (late twelfth-early thirteenth centuries) from a pit at Sparta, Laconia. Observations on provenance issues and social, economic and historical context»

In: Pl. Petridis-An. G. Yangaki-N. Liaros-El.-Ev. Bia (eds), Proceeding of the 12th Congress of AIECM3 International Association for the study of medieval and modern ceramics on Mediterranean, (Athens Greece, 21-27 October 2018), Vol. II, 615-625, Athens 2021., 2021

A rescue excavation carried out in 2001, at a site at the southeast part of Lakedaimon,-the Byzantine Sparta-, in a distance from the inhabited "extra muros" area of the city, revealed a pit cut into the natural ground and filled with an assemblage of Byzantine pottery. The ceramic material, recovered from the pit, represents the decorative types of the incised-sgraffito ware and the champlevé ware, of high quality, dated from the late twelfth to the early thirteenth century. It also includes coarse ware, mainly "proto-geometric" jugs with slip-painted decoration. The decorative and chronological homogeneity of the deposit in the pit is impressive, together with the fact that it is quite unlikely to have been locally produced. In the proposed communication, the pottery will be presented and discussed in the perspective of the social, economic and everyday life: the productive activities, the economic development of the city during the twelfth-thirteenth centuries, the wider picture of the regional economy, in accordance with the existing maritime and route networks. Une fouille de sauvetage réalisée en 2001 sur un site situé dans la partie sud-est de Lacédémone-Spartes byzantine-, à une certaine distance de la zone «extra muros» habitée de la ville, a révélée une fosse creusée dans le sol naturel, remplie d'un assemblage de céramique byzantine. Le matériel céramique, récupéré de la fosse, représente les types décoratifs de la vaisselle incisée-sgraffito et de la vaisselle champlevé de haute qualité datant de la fin du douzième au début du treizième siècle. L'homogénéité décorative et chronologique du gisement dans la fosse est impressionnante, de même que le fait qu'il soit peu probable qu'il ait été produit localement. Dans la communication proposée, la céramique sera présentée et discutée dans la perspective de la vie sociale, économique et quotidienne: activités productives, développement économique de la ville aux douzième et treizième siècles, la vision d'ensemble de l'économie régionale.