Philosophy of Law SYLLABUS (Fall 2002) (original) (raw)
Related papers
The third edition of Legal Theory continues to provide a focused summary of key points relating to the main theories and concepts covered in legal theory and jurisprudence courses. The book is aimed primarily at students encountering legal theory for the first time or seeking a concise summary of the area for revision purposes. The third edition contains a new chapter on critical reasoning. Several other parts of the book have been revised and updated to reflect recent developments, including new suggestions for further reading.
Philosophy of Law, eds. Jerzy Zajadło, Kamil Zeidler
Gdansk University Press - Wolters Kluwer, 2016
University studies mean the critical reading of texts, and also reflection. The latter should be stimulated by lectures and tutorials, and by discussion. In an attempt to meet the needs of students, we offer here a handbook for the study of the philosophy of law. An innovative idea underlies this handbook – teaching an aspect of law through questions and answers. It is based on a philosophical approach to the study of law. We have proceeded from a position that the subject of philosophy of law may be dealt with in five sections. These are: (I) methodology; (II) people; (III) approaches; (IV) concepts; and (V) hard cases. The contents of our book reflects this division into parts. At the outset, however, we must mention some reservations. First, this handbook considers problems of contemporary philosophy of law, but it is by no means a handbook of the history of philosophy of law. Second, this handbook has a module-based organization. In the future, it will be possible to change these modules as required. Thus, it is an open-ended offering, which will certainly - and this was part of the project from the start - be subject to further changes, supplements, and modifications in subsequent editions.
Apropos of A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence: Volumes 1?3
Ratio Juris, 2007
A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence is an ambitious project. It is divided into two parts: systematic (or theoretical) and historical; each consists of five volumes. This review concerns volumes 1-3 1 of the systematic part (the two remaining volumes will be reviewed in the next issue of Ratio Juris; the historical volumes have not yet been published). Thus, the Treatise is intended to cover the whole of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence. It must be stressed that the series does not constitute a handbook (today, it is an open season for handbooks, sometimes consisting of many volumes; for example, The Handbook of Philosophical Logic is planned to have 18 volumes), aimed at students, but an advanced treatment of theoretical jurisprudence and its history. The general strategy adopted by the editors and the advisory board consisted in giving free vein to the authors as to the mode of presentation. They could present their own views, use the standard material, or combine the two approaches. All the authors chose the third option, although the proportion between combining personal opinions and what might be considered as standard material differs. Independently of the forthcoming historical volumes, the theoreti