Aspects of a rhetoric of the body and the letter to the Romans : general (original) (raw)
Related papers
Em(Bodied) Texts: A Consideration of the Hermeneutics of Identity Formation in the Pauline Tradition
Physiognomy is concerned with how we read bodies. In this paper I explore the hermeneutical relationship between textual bodies and physical bodies by looking at the Pauline letters within the context of Roman Imperial ideology. With an understanding of the contextual backdrop against which and within which Paul's letters are to be understood, consideration is given to the ongoing influence of a body of texts, such as a Pauline corpus, in shaping bodies, arguing that bodies of texts rub up against physical bodies shaping identity both positively and negatively. Careful analysis of the scripted nature of bodily comportment is given by drawing attention to the regulative, normativising role of textual bodies on physical bodies, whether ancient or contemporary. In so doing, this paper seeks to wrestle with the hermeneutics of identity formation both in the Pauline letters and in the reception history of these letters for the church.
“Rhetoric for a Christian Community: The Poems of the Codex Visionum”
The Codex Visionum reflects the religious identity of a community of δίκαιοι, but also their cultural identity. This was an established community, which already owned a rich library and decided to copy a composite book to gather together texts that had already been composed, chosen because together they create a coherent discourse, with clear mottos and easily recognisable language and rhetoric. It is on the different areas where rhetoric is present in the poems of the Codex that this paper will focus. Starting with the general rhetorical discourse (1), I shall then go on to analyse the rhetorical structure of the Codex and its links with the genre of biography (2), the influence of the rhetorical rules of biography (3) and the presence of rhetorical micro-structures (4). To this I will add some notes on the reasons for and the consequences of the choice of poetry as the vehicle of expression of Christian ideas in the Codex (5), and, in manner of a conclusion (6), some remarks on the attitude towards paideia in the Codex, within the general framework of Christian attitudes towards classical paideia.
The Affections of the Soul: Pathos, Protreptic, and Preaching in Hellenistic Thought
When we examine the role of pathos in the Pauline epistles, we are doing something quite complicated. We are discussing a group of texts written in the early Christian era which bear the weight of nearly two millenia of historical interpretation. We cannot, as Jowett advocated, "read the Bible as any other work of literature" (1860). Differences over readings of "Ode to a Grecian Urn" might, at their most overwhelmingly significant, lead to intense discussions during a conference panel attended by some thirty or forty people or debates in journals read by a few thousand specialists. People, however, have fought wars, been martyred, and been burned as heretics over the interpretation of the Bible. What makes sacred literature distinctive is intention and reception. Paul was not writing, as were Longus and Plautus, to provide light entertainment, and his works were not read or heard for topical humor (like Aristophanes') or risqué charm (like Catullus'). When we consider how to understand the use of pathetic appeal in the Pauline epistles, we need to contextualize his rhetorical strategies in terms of religious rather than secular purpose, and effect on the soul (as in philosophical protreptic) rather than on opinion (as in deliberative and forensic oratory). Thus we need to understand the rhetorical strategies, and especially the appeals to emotions, in the Pauline epistles in light of the philosophical theories of protreptic, the emotions, and the soul rather than, or at least in addition to, the handbooks of practical rhetoric.
The present study argues that the main content of Paul's letter to the Romans is a deliberative argument based on appeals to honor, which aimed at promoting mutual tolerance among Roman believers. Providing both a corroboration of, and a minor corrective to, Robert Jewett's monumental reading of Romans, this article reads Romans against the background of symbouleutic rhetoric, as attested in the orations of Dio Chrysostom and Aelius Aristides, and it seeks to shed light on the argumentative functions and nuances of each 'theological' unit for the overall flow of the argumentation in Romans. Paul elaborates upon the particular ramifications of his gospel most pertinent for addressing communal problems in the Roman congregations, namely, the transformative potential of the gospel to create a newly enabled moral agency through the indwelling spirit. Paul tries to cultivate an 'analytical stance' among the Roman believers so that they could deliberate about the best course of action with regard to the Jewish law concerning food and Sabbath.
BODILY PARTS VYING FOR POWER: HIERARCHIES AND BODIES IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY
In this essay I argue that a rhetoric of the body exposes the all-pervasiveness of the hierarchical principle as it manifested itself in the Graeco-Roman world. The parts of the ancient body were constructed with the fabrics of the social body. Implications for an engendered interpretation of Biblical writings are indicated and demonstrated via an analysis of selected passages from the Pauline letters.
Literature, 2022
This brief study addresses the controversial issue of the relationship with the body, with the flesh, on the part of pagan and Christian thinkers at a particularly important point in their evolution, in the late fourth and early fifth centuries, a time in which Neoplatonic thinkers had to defend their doctrinal positions against the increasingly hegemonic position of the triumphant Christianity. In this sense, it is particularly interesting to approach the perspective of two authors who are not strictly speaking philosophers: in particular, Synesius of Cyrene, a thinker in the Neoplatonic tradition who became a Christian bishop, complemented also by some interesting reflections by Eunapius of Sardis, historian and biographer of Neoplatonic philosophers. In the light of this analysis, it becomes clear that the discussion on the value of the body and carnality is an essential point of doctrinal discrepancy in this period and, contrary to what sometimes appears, the discrepancy also pertains to the formation of the intellectual, and Christianity clearly appears as a doctrine obsessed with the flesh to the detriment of the soul.