Hybrid Repair of Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections: The European Perspective (original) (raw)
Related papers
Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissections
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2018
Background: Open surgical repair remains the "gold standard" treatment for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBD) with aneurysm. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has gained popularity in recent years for the treatment of thoracic aortic diseases, including cTBD. We assessed the effectiveness of TEVAR in the treatment of cTBD using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database. Methods: The VQI registry identified 4713 patients treated with TEVAR from July 2010 to November 2015, including 125 repairs for cTBD. We analyzed TEVAR outcomes in this cohort per the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards for TEVAR. Results: Median age was 65.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.0-72.0 years), and 85 (68.0%) were male. Median aneurysm diameter was 5.5 cm (IQR, 4.8-6.3 cm). Sixty-two (49.6%) patients were asymptomatic on presentation, 57 (45.6%) were symptomatic, and 6 (4.8%) presented with rupture. Median length of stay was 8.0 days (IQR, 4.0-11.0 days). Fluoroscopy time was 17.3 minutes (IQR, 10.5-25.6 minutes). The distal landing zone was aortic zone 4 in 27 (21.6%) and aortic zone 5 and distal in 98 (78.4%) patients. Successful device delivery occurred in 123 (98.4%) patients. Conversion to open repair occurred in one (0.8%) patient. A type IA endoleak was present in 2 (1.6%), type IB endoleak in 2 (1.6%), and type II endoleak in 2 (1.6%) patients. Perioperative complications included stroke in 1 (0.8%), respiratory complications in 6 (4.8%), and spinal cord ischemia symptoms present at discharge in 3 (2.4%) patients. In-hospital mortality occurred in three (2.4%) patients. Reintervention was required in two (1.6%) patients for false lumen perfusion and in two (1.6%)
Ten years of endovascular aortic arch repair
Journal of …, 2010
To evaluate a 10-year single-center experience of arch endovascular aortic repair (AEVAR) using the hybrid approach. Methods: Between 1999 and 2009, 311 patients were treated with endografts for thoracic aortic pathologies. The aortic arch was involved in 116 (37.3%) patients (97 men; mean age 70.3610.7 years, range 27-84). There were 83 atherosclerotic aneurysms, 21 type B dissections, and 12 other lesions whose proximal landing zones were categorized according to Ishimaru's classification as 24 zone 0, 27 zone 1, and 65 zone 2. A hybrid approach was performed for all zone 0 and zone 1 procedures and in nearly half (47.7%) of zone 2 procedures. Early and midterm outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Results: The initial clinical success in zone 0 aneurysms was 83.3%, with a 30-day mortality of 12.5% due to intraoperative stroke in all the cases. The respiratory failure rate was 12.5%, and there was 1 type I endoleak that spontaneously resolved at follow-up. Midterm clinical success at a mean 26621 months was 83.3%. In zone 1 aneurysms, the initial clinical success was 82.1% without 30-day mortality or perioperative stroke. The midterm clinical success was 81.5% at a mean 21617 months [2 (7.4%) late aneurysm-related deaths]. Four type I endoleaks spontaneously resolved in 3 patients. In zone 2 cases, the initial clinical success was 90.8%. There was 1 (1.5%) intraoperative death and another (1.5%) within 30 days; 1 (1.5%) patient suffered a stroke, and the respiratory and renal failure rates were 3.0%, respectively. This is the only zone in which paraplegia (2 patients, 3.0%) was encountered. The midterm clinical success was 93.9% at a mean 34620 months. Four type I endoleaks spontaneously resolved in 3 patients at follow-up. Conclusion: In selected patients, early and midterm outcomes of AEVAR using the hybrid approach are promising; however, mortality and morbidity, especially for zones 0 and 1, are not negligible. Our results may have practical implications for the ongoing evolution of the hybrid procedure in the aortic arch, as well as for patients fit for traditional surgery.
Hybrid repair of thoracic aortic lesions for zone 0 and 1 in high-risk patients
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2012
Purpose: Some patients with aortic arch or descending thoracic aorta pathologies are not suited for open repair because of comorbidities that may increase their risk of procedural complications or death. Endovascular approaches may also be difficult when there are inadequate proximal landing zones in the aortic arch. We report our experience using rerouting techniques with bypass, stenting of the branches, or a combination of both to create a landing area in zones 0 and 1 of the aortic arch. Methods: Since November 2002, thoracic aortic endoluminal grafts were placed in 38 patients in whom the endograft was deployed in zone 0 (n ؍ 27) or zone 1 (n ؍ 11). A retrospective review is included. Results: There were 11 women and 27 men with a mean age of 65.4 years (range 38-88). Aortic pathology included 12 Stanford type A dissections, 10 aortic arch aneurysms, 8 Stanford type B dissections, 3 descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, 2 aortobronchial fistulas, 1 innominate artery aneurysm and 2 aortic arch pseudoaneurysms. In zone 0, 21 had thoracic debranching with an ascending bypass, three patients had a remote-inflow and three patients had a chimney-stent with carotid-carotid bypass. In zone 1, five patients had a carotid-carotid bypass, one patient had an aortic to left common carotid artery (LCCA) bypass and five patients had chimney-stent on the LCCA. Fifty-eight percent of the patients were symptomatic and 26% emergent. Three patients required hemodialysis postoperatively (7.9%), 18 patients (47.4%) required prolonged mechanical ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. Paraplegia occurred in one patient (2.7%), and five patients suffered a cerebrovascular accident (13.1%). There were four early type I and two type II endoleaks. Overall 30-day mortality was 23.7%. Conclusions: The hybrid approach for repair of the aortic arch pathologies is feasible in patients unfit for open repair. We present the results of performing different techniques to treat the aortic arch with hybrid repair with antegrade or retrograde inflow, stenting of the branches or a combination of both. Long-term results are unknown, and larger series results and comparative studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy. ( J Vasc Surg 2012;55:318-25.)
Postoperative Outcomes of Complex Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using Hybrid Open-Endovascular Techniques
Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2018
Aortic disease becomes more prevalent with age and can result in acute aortic conditions including aneurysm, dissection, intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers. Repair techniques for these conditions remain controversial due to the varying outcomes of studies. This retrospective study collected and analyzed data from twenty-three (23) patients with complex aortic aneurysms repaired using hybrid open-endovascular techniques. A high percentage of patients (82.6%) suffered from multiple comorbidities, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure and prior aortic procedures. All patients presented with ASA scores 3 or 4. Eleven patients (47.8%) presented with aneurysms of the ascending, transverse and descending arch, and seven patients (30.4%) with thoracoabdominal aneurysm. 78.3% of patients underwent thoracic vessel debranching, while the remainder underwent visceral vessel debranching (13.0%) or thoracic and visceral debranching (8.7%). No patients suffered visceral ischemia, spinal cord injury, extremity amputation or reoperation for bleeding post-operatively. Two patients suffered minor stroke (8.7%) and one patient (4.3%) had major stroke. Three patients (13.0%) suffered temporary kidney injury and one patient (4.3%) developed renal failure requiring dialysis. Four patients (17.4%) developed Type II stent graft endoleaks. All patients had patent grafts. Reintervention occurred in two patients (8.7%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in three patients (13.0%). These results are within the range reported in other studies involving hybrid repair of aortic conditions, and show that hybrid open-endovascular repair is a feasible alternative in high-risk patients.
Novel approach to a type I endoleak following a hybrid repair of an arch aortic aneurysm
Vascular and endovascular surgery
Hybrid surgical and endovascular approaches such as open visceral vessel debranching and subsequent endovascular exclusion of thoracic abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) represents a significant development in treatment of TAAAs. As compared to traditional endovascular aneurysm repair, hybrid repairs commonly have a higher rate of endoleak and other endograft-related complications. In this report, we present a 71 year-old man with significant comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and prostate cancer. The patient after undergoing debranching of the thoracic arch followed by endograft repair of an arch aneurysm developed a proximal type I and type II endoleak fed by the previously ligated left subclavian artery. Despite coiling of the left subclavian artery and proximal extension of the endograft, a type I endoleak persisted. Several months after the left subclavian artery was coiled, a catheter was advanced through the coils and beyond the site of...
Hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2013
Objective: Hybrid interventions combining debranching of supra-aortic branch vessels with stent grafting of the aortic arch have become an attractive alternative to open repair for aortic arch pathologies. However, results in patients with dissections of the aortic arch remain unclear. We present our experience with hybrid aortic arch repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissections (TBAD) involving the distal part of the arch and aortic dissections distal to previous repair of the ascending aorta. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2011, hybrid arch repair with supra-aortic branch revascularization involving at least one carotid artery bypass and simultaneous or staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed in 17 patients with a dissection involving the arch. Indications for hybrid repair were complicated acute TBAD in five patients (three impending ruptures, two malperfusion syndromes), chronic aneurysmal degeneration of a TBAD involving the aortic arch in eight, and chronic aneurysmal degeneration of a dissection distal to previous repair of the ascending aorta in four. Total arch debranching was performed in seven patients and cervical debranching in 10. Median follow-up was 13 months (range, 3-69 months). Results: Overall 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality rates were 29% (5 of 17 patients). In-hospital death occurred in three of five patients (60%) with a complicated acute TBAD vs in two of 12 patients (17%) with chronic dissection (P [ .12) and in one of seven (14%) with total arch debranching vs four of 10 patients (40%) with cervical debranching (P [ .34). Two (12%) fatal strokes and four (24%) retrograde aortic dissections occurred. Retrograde aortic dissections tended to be more prevalent in patients with acute TBAD than in those with chronic dissection (3 of 5 vs 1 of 12; P [ .053). No spinal cord ischemia was recorded. Two other patients died, at 8 and 26 months, after the operation of causes not related to the aortic dissection. Persistent perfusion in the aortic false lumen of the graft exclusion segment was identified in six patients, due to type III endoleak (n [ 2) requiring additional endovascular intervention, type II endoleak (n [ 3), or retrograde perfusion from distal fenestrations (n [ 2). No proximal type I endoleak was identified. During follow-up, the dissected aorta distal to the stent graft remained stable in all surviving patients. Conclusions: In this series, mortality rates and incidence of retrograde aortic dissection were significant after hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections, especially in acute cases. These results are in contrast with previously published series including other aortic arch pathologies. They suggest that dissections of the aortic arch may represent a less favorable patient cohort.
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2004
Purpose: The advent of endovascular prostheses to treat descending thoracic aortic lesions offers an alternative approach in patients who are poor candidates for surgery. The development of this approach includes complications that are common to the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms and some that are unique to thoracic endografting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 60 emergent and high-risk patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and dissections treated with endovascular prostheses over 4 years under existing investigational protocols or on an emergent compassionate use basis. Results: Fifty-nine of the 60 patients received treatment, with one access failure. Thirty-five patients received treatment of TAAs. Four of these procedures were performed emergently because of active hemorrhage. Twenty-four patients with aortic dissections (16 acute, 8 chronic) also received treatment. Eight of the patients with acute dissection had active hemorrhage at the time of treatment. Three devices were used: AneuRx (Medtronic; n ؍ 31), Talent (Medtronic; n ؍ 27), and Excluder (Gore; n ؍ 1). Nineteen secondary endovascular procedures were performed in 14 patients. Most were secondary to endoleak (14 of 19), most commonly caused by modular separation of overlapping devices (n ؍ 8). Other endoleaks included 4 proximal or distal type I leaks and 2 undefined endoleaks. The remaining secondary procedures were performed to treat recurrent dissection (n ؍ 1), pseudoaneurysm enlargement (n ؍ 3), and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n ؍ 1). One patient underwent surgical repair of a retrograde ascending aortic dissection after endograft placement. Procedure-related mortality was 17% in the TAA group and 13% in the dissection group, including 2 acute retrograde dissections that resulted in death from cardiac tamponade. Overall mortality was 28% at 2-year follow-up.
Aortic arch debranching and thoracic endovascular repair
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2014
Objective: Currently, the best approach to the aortic arch remains unsupported by robust evidence. Most of the available data rely on small sample numbers, heterogeneous settings, and limited follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate early and midterm results of arch debranching and endovascular procedures. Methods: From 2005 through 2013, 104 consecutive patients underwent elective arch treatment with debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Rates of perioperative (30-day) mortality and neurological complications, and mortality, endoleak, supra-aortic vessel patency, and arch diameter changes at 5 years were analyzed. Results: Patients' mean age was 69.8 years, and 90 were males. Twenty arches were repaired for dissection. Nineteen patients required total debranching for diseases extended to zone 0. In 59, debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedures were staged. At 30 days, death, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia occurred in six, four, and three patients, respectively. Extension to ascending aorta (zone 0 landing) was the only multivariate independent predictor for perioperative mortality (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-59.90; P [ .015), but not for stroke. Four retrograde dissections, two fatal, occurred during the perioperative period. At 1, 3, and 5 years, Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 89.0%, 82.8%, and 70.9%, and freedom from persistent endoleak rates were 96.1%, 92.5%, and 88.3%, respectively. Over 5-year follow-up, 34 aneurysms shrank $5 mm, and four grew. Five reinterventions were required. Two supra-aortic vessel occlusions and no late aorta-related mortalities were recorded. Conclusions: Despite the perioperative mortality risk, the late outcome of endovascular arch repair presents a low rate of aorta-related deaths and reinterventions and acceptable midterm survival. Furthermore, more than one-third of the aneurysms' diameters decrease over 5 years as a measure of the long-term efficacy of treatment. Retrograde type A dissection remains a major concern in the perioperative period and careful arch approach is required.
Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Aneurysms
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2005
Introduction. The aim of this study was to review our clinical experience with endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysms using different commercially available grafts (Gore, Talent, Endomed, Cook). Methods. From 1999 to 2004, 97 patients received endovascular treatment for diseases of the thoracic aorta. In 30 cases (26 males, 4 females) the aortic arch was involved. The left subclavian artery was overstented (Ishimaru zone '2') in 18 cases (60%). Only in the first three cases had the subclavian artery been revascularized. The left common and subclavian arteries were covered (zone '1') in 6 (20%) cases-all had the carotid artery reconstructed, either simultaneously (five cases) or as a staged procedure (one case). Finally, the whole aortic arch was over-stented (zone '0') in 6 (20%) cases, with simultaneous (five cases) or staged (one case) grafting of the supra-aortic vessels from the ascending aorta. Results. Perioperative mortality was 2/30 (7%), due to graft migration (zone '2') and intra-operative stroke (zone '0'), respectively. One minor stroke was observed. No cases of paraplegia were recorded. Three type I endoleaks were observed. Two resolved at 6 months follow-up; one zone '0' graft is still being followed. There was one surgical conversion for endograft failure 2 weeks after implantation. Thus, the technical success rate was 87% (26/30) cases. The mean follow-up time was 23G17 months. No new onset endoleaks or aneurysm-related deaths were recorded. Conclusions. Currently available grafts may be deployed in the aortic arch in most instances. De-branching of the aortic arch with surgical revascularization for zone '0' and '1' seems to be adequate to obtain a satisfactory proximal landing zone.